A phase I/II study of arfolitixorin and 5-fluorouracil in combination with oxaliplatin (plus or minus bevacizumab) or irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with a folate remains an essential treatment component for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Leucovorin is the folate most often used, but requires intracellular conversion to a reduced folate, and has high pharmacokinetic variability and limited bioavailability in patients with low folate pathway gene expression. Arfolitixorin is an immediately active form of folate, [6R]-5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate ([6R]-MTHF), and may improve outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label, multicenter, phase I/II study in patients with mCRC (NCT02244632) assessed the tolerability and efficacy of first- or second-line arfolitixorin (30, 60, 120, or 240 mg/m2 intravenous) with 5-FU alone, or in combination with oxaliplatin (plus or minus bevacizumab) or irinotecan, every 14 days. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics were assessed before and after four cycles (8 weeks) of treatment. RESULTS: In 105 treated patients, investigators reported 583 adverse events (AEs) in 86 patients (81.9%), and 256 AEs (43.9%) were potentially related to arfolitixorin and 5-FU. Dose adjustments were required in 16 patients (15.2%). At 8 weeks, 9 out of 57 patients assessed for efficacy achieved an objective response (15.8%), and all 9 achieved a partial response. Six of these nine patients had received arfolitixorin as a first-line treatment. A further 33 patients (57.9%) achieved stable disease. Pharmacokinetics were assessed in 35 patients. The average tmax was 10 min, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 1 h increased linearly between 30 and 240 mg/m2. No accumulation was observed for [6R]-MTHF following repeated administration, and there were no major pharmacokinetic differences between cycle 1 and cycle 4 at any dose. CONCLUSIONS: Arfolitixorin is a well-tolerated moderator of 5-FU activity. It is suitable for further investigation in mCRC and has the potential to improve treatment outcomes in patients with low folate pathway gene expression. Arfolitixorin can easily be incorporated into current standard of care, requiring minimal changes to chemotherapy regimens.

Second-line pazopanib in patients with relapsed and refractory small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group.

BACKGROUND: Pazopanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression is increased in SCLC and is correlated with poor prognosis. The efficacy and tolerance of second-line pazopanib in SCLC was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with platinum-sensitive (cohort A; n=39) and -resistant/refractory (cohort B; n=19) SCLC were enrolled in a multicentre phase II study. The primary end point was the progression-free survival rate (PFS-R) at week 8 in each cohort. Pazopanib (800 mg per day per os) was administered until progressive disease (PD). Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) were enumerated using the Cellsearch assay. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. In the intention-to-treat analysis, eight (13.8%) patients achieved partial response (PR) (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.0-22.7), 20 (34.5%) stable disease (SD) and 30 (51.7%) PD. Accrual in cohort B was halted because the hard-stop rule was met; in cohort A, the PFS-R was 59% (95% CI: 43.5-74.4; PR=7, SD=16). Nine (23.1%) patients received pazopanib for >6 months and 3 of them for >12 months. One pazopanib cycle resulted to a significant decrease to the number of patients with ⩾5 CTCs/7.5 ml of blood (20%) compared with baseline (50%). The median PFS and OS for all patients was 2.5 months (95% CI: 1.9-3.1 months) and 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.8-8.2 months), respectively (cohort A: PFS=3.7 months and OS=8.0 months). No unexpected toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line treatment with pazopanib in platinum-sensitive SCLC is well tolerated and resulted in promising objective responses and disease control; CTC enumeration might serve as a reliable surrogate biomarker of response.

Salvage treatment with irinotecan/cisplatin versus pemetrexed/cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer pre-treated with a non-platinum-based regimen in the first-line setting: a randomized phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

Background. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard front-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, non-platinum combinations of third-generation chemotherapeutic agents are considered an alternative therapeutic option for patients who cannot tolerate the toxic effects of platinum compounds. In this study, the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin (IC) was compared to pemetrexed plus cisplatin (PC) regimen, in platinum-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC, who had been previously treated with the combination of a taxane plus gemcitabine. Patients and methods. A total of 124 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to either irinotecan 110 mg/m2 on day 1 and 100 mg/m2 on day 8 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 8 every 3 weeks (IC arm) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (PC arm). The primary endpoint of the study was the overall response rate (ORR). Results. The ORR and median progression-free survival (PFS) in the IC arm were 18 % and 3.3 months, respectively, while in the PC arm were 19 % and 4.2 months (p = ns). Median overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in patients with PC (6.9 vs. 10.9; p = 0.013). PC regimen had a better toxicity profile compared to IC, with a statistically significant lower incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (3 vs. 31 %; p = 0.0001) and diarrhea (1.6 vs. 14.7 %, p = 0.018). Conclusions. In patients with advanced NSCLC pretreated with docetaxel/gemcitabine, the combination of pemetrexed/cisplatin is associated with increased OS and is better tolerated than the combination of irinotecan/cisplatin and should be considered as a valid therapeutic option for platinum-naive, previously treated patients (AU)

No disponible

Salvage treatment with irinotecan/cisplatin versus pemetrexed/cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer pre-treated with a non-platinum-based regimen in the first-line setting: a randomized phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG).

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard front-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, non-platinum combinations of third-generation chemotherapeutic agents are considered an alternative therapeutic option for patients who cannot tolerate the toxic effects of platinum compounds. In this study, the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin (IC) was compared to pemetrexed plus cisplatin (PC) regimen, in platinum-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC, who had been previously treated with the combination of a taxane plus gemcitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 124 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to either irinotecan 110 mg/m2 on day 1 and 100 mg/m2 on day 8 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 8 every 3 weeks (IC arm) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (PC arm). The primary endpoint of the study was the overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The ORR and median progression-free survival (PFS) in the IC arm were 18 % and 3.3 months, respectively, while in the PC arm were 19 % and 4.2 months (p = ns). Median overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in patients with PC (6.9 vs. 10.9; p = 0.013). PC regimen had a better toxicity profile compared to IC, with a statistically significant lower incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (3 vs. 31 %; p = 0.0001) and diarrhea (1.6 vs. 14.7 %, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced NSCLC pretreated with docetaxel/gemcitabine, the combination of pemetrexed/cisplatin is associated with increased OS and is better tolerated than the combination of irinotecan/cisplatin and should be considered as a valid therapeutic option for platinum-naive, previously treated patients. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00614965.

A multicentre phase II trial of cabazitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer progressing after docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel, a semisynthetic microtubule inhibitor, has shown antitumour activity in models resistant to paclitaxel and docetaxel, and it has been approved for the treatment of docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer. We investigated its activity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing under or after docetaxel-based regimens. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic NSCLC, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, were enrolled; patients had to have received up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced disease, including one docetaxel-containing regimen. Treatment consisted of cabazitaxel (25 mg m(-2) intravenously, every 21 days) until disease progression. The primary end point was the overall response rate. RESULTS: Among the 46 evaluable patients, 28.3% had squamous cell carcinoma and 54.3% had adenocarcinoma. Eight (17.4%) patients had received one and 38 (82.6%) two prior chemotherapy regimens. Treatment compliance was 95%; 26 (16%) cycles were delayed because of toxicity, (n=13) and dose reduction was required in 6 (13%) patients because of haematologic toxicity. Six (13%) patients achieved a partial response and 17 (37.0%) stable disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-3.2) and 7.4 (95% CI: 5.2-9.6) months, respectively. Grade 4 adverse events included neutropenia (n=8; 17%), febrile neutropenia (n=6; 13%) and thrombocytopenia (n=3; 6.5%). There was one treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: Cabazitaxel exhibits activity in NSCLC patients pre-treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy with a substantial but manageable toxicity profile. The drug merits further evaluation in this indication.

Dose-dense FEC followed by docetaxel versus docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with HER2-negative, axillary lymph node-positive early breast cancer: a multicenter randomized study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG).

BACKGROUND: Sequential administration of anthracycline and taxane is the current standard of care adjuvant regimen for node-positive early breast cancer. Due to long-term toxicity concerns, anthracycline-free regimens have been developed. We compared a sequential dose-dense anthracycline and taxane regimen with the anthracycline-free regimen of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, non-inferiority, phase III trial, women with HER2-negative invasive breast cancer and at least one positive axillary lymph node were randomized to receive either epirubicin (75 mg/m(2)), 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks for four cycles, followed by four cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks with prophylactic G-CSF support (FEC → D) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) every 21 days for six cycles (TC). The primary end point of the study was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty women were randomized to either FEC → D (n = 326) or TC (n = 324). After a median follow-up of 46 and 47 months, the 3-year DFS rate was 89.5% and 91.1% for the FEC → D and TC arm, respectively (hazard ratio = 1.147, 95% confidence interval 0.716-1.839, P = 0.568). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was higher in the TC arm (32.4% versus 10.5%, P = 0.0001). The incidence of neutropenic fever was low (<1%). Nausea, vomiting, hand-foot syndrome and fatigue (grade 3-4) were more common with FEC → D. Acute cardiotoxicity was rare (1 event in each group). There were no toxic deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This trial did not clearly demonstrate that TC is non-inferior to dose-dense FEC → D. However, 3-year DFS rates were excellent in both arms for women with node-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT01985724.

Efficacy and tolerance of frontline bevacizumab-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter, phase IV study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG).

INTRODUCTION: The addition of bevacizumab to the first-line chemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) of non-squamous histology has been shown to improve survival. A multicenter, single-arm, phase IV study was conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of frontline bevacizumab-based chemotherapy regimens in real life. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated recurrent or metastatic non-squamous, NSCLC, with no contraindications for bevacizumab, were enrolled. Bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) was administered in combination with both platinum- and non-platinum-based chemotherapy doublets or with single-agent chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Treatment with bevacizumab was continued until disease progression. The primary end point of the study was the safety profile of bevacizumab regimens, whereas the secondary end points included overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rate. RESULTS: From February 2010 to April 2014, a total of 314 patients were enrolled in the study; the median age was 63, 74.8 % were men, 95.9 % had a performance status of 0-1, 90.4 % had metastatic disease, and 94.3 % had adenocarcinoma. Grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 11.5 % of the patients, 1.3 % experienced febrile neutropenia, 2.6 % grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, 2.8 % thromboembolism, and 1.6 % severe bleeding. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 7.0 % of patients because of adverse events. There were three toxic deaths. Median progression-free survival was 7.7 months, and median overall survival was 17.6 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of bevacizumab with chemotherapy in the first-line setting of NSCLC is safe and active when used in appropriately selected patients. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01934465.

Sequential administration of vinorelbine plus cisplatin and bevacizumab followed by docetaxel plus gemcitabine and bevacizumab compared to docetaxel plus cisplatin and bevacizumab regimen as first-line therapy for advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter randomized phase II trial of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG).

OBJECTIVES: To compare the activity and tolerance of the consecutive administration of four active chemotherapeutic agents in combination with bevacizumab to a bevacizumab- and platinum-based chemotherapy doublet as front-line treatment in patients with non-squamous NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, performance status of 0-2 and normal organ function were randomized to receive either 3 cycles every 3 weeks of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1), oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (day 1) every 3 weeks (VCB regimen) followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m(2), day 1), gemcitabine (1100 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8) and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (day 1) (DGB regimen) (arm A) or 6 cycles of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 (DCB regimen; arm B) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-eight and 39 patients were enrolled in arm A and B, respectively. The study did not meet its primary endpoint since, the ORR was 39.5% (95% CI: 23.9-55.0%; 1CR and 14 PR) and 46.2% (95% CI: 30.5-61.8%; 2 CR and 16 PR) in arm A and B, respectively (p=0.554). There was no significant difference in terms of response duration (7.4 versus 4.7 months in arm A and B, respectively; p=0.697), progression-free survival (5.8 versus 5.5 months, respectively; p=0.540) and overall survival (16.9 versus 10.9 months; p=0.390). No difference was recorded between the two arms regarding the toxicity profile. There were two drug-related deaths in arm B. CONCLUSION: Sequential therapy of VCB followed by DGB is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen but failed to show any superiority over the standard DCB regimen.

Cisplatin in combination with metronomic vinorelbine as front-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of metronomic vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 41 patients with inoperable stage IIIb or stage IV NSCLC (14 with adenocarcinomas, 19 with squamous cell carcinoma and eight with other types), PS = 0-2, were treated with cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) in combination with oral metronomic vinorelbine (60 mg total dose, every other day) in cycles of 21 days. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy were evaluable for toxicity and response. Partial response was achieved in 13 patients (ORR 37.1%; CI 21.1-53.1%) and stable disease in 10 (28.6%). After a median follow-up period of 26.2 months (range 0.5-33.4 months), the median progression-free survival was 4.2 months and the median overall survival 12.0 months. The 1-year survival rate was 52.6%. Myelosuppression was the main adverse event with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurring in five (14.3%) and six (17.1%) patients, respectively. Three of these patients presented with febrile neutropenia and there was one death due to sepsis. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild. CONCLUSION: Cisplatin in combination with metronomic vinorelbine is an active, although myelotoxic, therapeutic option in the first-line setting for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, which merits further evaluation in randomized trials.

Targeted therapy in colorectal cancer: current status and future challenges.

Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has progressed significantly over the last years, particularly with the introduction of targeted therapies. Two groups of agents targeting either the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have been integrated into clinical practice. Currently available agents with established role include the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) cetuximab / panitumumab and the anti-VEGF mAb bevacizumab. This review presents an update on the clinical studies evaluating the role of anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF agents in mCRC. Moreover, we provide current data regarding the mechanism of action and pathways mediating resistance to these agents. In addition, we present recent data with respect to biomarkers and we discuss future therapeutic strategies.