Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20172017 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28343156

ABSTRACT

We present an interesting case where a patient is presented with a droopy left eyelid (as part of Horner syndrome) and Cushingoid features which were a result of a Pancoast tumour (apical lung tumour in superior pulmonary sulcus) involving the left lung. This tumour was secreting ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), a paraneoplastic endocrine phenomenon, which resulted in Cushing syndrome symptomatology. Though most ectopic ACTH-producing lung cancers are either small cell or carcinoid tumours, this was in fact a large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC). Patient underwent surgical resection and adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy with radiation; however, he succumbed to LCNEC given aggressive nature of the disease.


Subject(s)
ACTH Syndrome, Ectopic/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Large Cell/complications , Horner Syndrome , Pancoast Syndrome , ACTH Syndrome, Ectopic/etiology , Adrenocorticotropic Hormone , Carcinoid Tumor/complications , Carcinoid Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoid Tumor/surgery , Carcinoma, Large Cell/metabolism , Fatigue/etiology , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Male , Neoadjuvant Therapy
2.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 11: 64, 2012 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22681705

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist treatment may improve endothelial function via direct and indirect mechanisms. We compared the acute and chronic effects of the GLP-1 receptor agonist exenatide vs. metformin on endothelial function in patients with obesity and pre-diabetes. METHODS: We performed a randomized, open-label, clinical trial in 50 non-diabetic individuals (mean age 58.5 ± 10.0; 38 females) with abdominal obesity and either impaired fasting glucose, elevated HbA1c, or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) who were randomized to receive 3-months of exenatide or metformin. Microvascular endothelial function, assessed by digital reactive hyperemia (reactive hyperemic index: RHI), C-reactive protein (CRP), circulating oxidized LDL (oxLDL), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) were measured at baseline and 3-months. Seven subjects with IGT participated in a sub-study comparing the effects of pre-administration of exenatide and metformin on postprandial endothelial function. RESULTS: There were no differences for the change in RHI (Δ exenatide: 0.01 ± 0.68 vs. Δ metformin: -0.17 ± 0.72, P = 0.348), CRP, oxLDL, or VCAM-1 between exenatide and metformin treatment. Triglycerides were reduced more with exenatide compared to metformin (Δ exenatide: -25.5 ± 45.7 mg/dL vs. Δ metformin: -2.9 ± 22.8 mg/dL, P = 0.032). In the sub-study, there was no difference in postprandial RHI between exenatide and metformin. CONCLUSIONS: Three months of exenatide therapy had similar effects on microvascular endothelial function, markers of inflammation, oxidative stress, and vascular activation, as metformin, in patients with obesity and pre-diabetes. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: This study is registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/: NCT00546728.


Subject(s)
Endothelium, Vascular/drug effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Microcirculation/drug effects , Obesity, Abdominal/complications , Peptides/therapeutic use , Prediabetic State/drug therapy , Upper Extremity/blood supply , Venoms/therapeutic use , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Blood Glucose/metabolism , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Endothelium, Vascular/metabolism , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Exenatide , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Hyperemia/physiopathology , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Lipoproteins, LDL/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Abdominal/blood , Obesity, Abdominal/physiopathology , Prediabetic State/blood , Prediabetic State/complications , Prediabetic State/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1/blood
3.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 14(2): 85-91, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22277140

ABSTRACT

The authors hypothesized that carvedilol controlled-release plus lisinopril combination therapy (C+L) would increase endothelial function and decrease oxidative stress to a greater extent than hydrochlorothiazide plus lisinopril combination therapy (H+L) in obese patients with hypertension. Twenty-five abdominally obese patients (aged 54.4±7.3 years; 14 women) with hypertension/prehypertension were enrolled in a 7-month (two 3-month treatment periods separated by a 1-month washout), randomized, double-blind, controlled, crossover clinical trial comparing C+L vs H+L. Endothelial function, measured by digital reactive hyperemic index (RHI), circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), 8-isoprostane, and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) were obtained at baseline, post-period 1, post-washout, and post-period 2. Analyses were adjusted for baseline measurements by analysis of covariance, with robust variance estimation for confidence intervals and P values. C+L treatment compared to H+L treatment significantly improved RHI (0.74, 95% confidence interval, 0.31-1.19, P =.001). This difference persisted after adjustment for the change in systolic blood pressure. No significant treatment differences were observed for oxLDL, 8-isoprostane, or ADMA. These data provide evidence that independent of blood pressure-lowering, C+L therapy improves endothelial function to a greater extent than H+L therapy. Levels of oxidative stress were not significantly different between treatments, suggesting that other mechanisms may be responsible for the improvement in endothelial function.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Carbazoles/administration & dosage , Endothelium, Vascular/drug effects , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Lisinopril/administration & dosage , Obesity, Abdominal/epidemiology , Obesity, Abdominal/physiopathology , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Propanolamines/administration & dosage , Carvedilol , Cross-Over Studies , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxidative Stress/physiology
6.
Cornea ; 24(8): 955-8, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16227840

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the absorption of moxifloxacin into human aqueous humor after administration of moxifloxacin hydrochloride ophthalmic solution, 0.5% as base. METHODS: Cataract patients were randomly allocated to receive 1 drop every 15 minutes for 4 doses before surgery (group 1) or 1 drop 4 times per day on the day before surgery plus the same preoperative regimen as group 1 (group 2). The last dose was administered 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, or 3 hours before aqueous humor sampling. Samples from 30 patients per group were analyzed by a validated HPLC/MS/MS method. RESULTS: For group 1, the mean +/- SD C(max) was 1.50 +/- 0.75 microg/mL and occurred at 0.5 hour after dosing. The mean C(max) for group 2 was 1.74 +/- 0.66 microg/mL and was reached at 1 to 2 hours. Mean AUC(0-3h) for groups 1 and 2 were 3.16 +/- 0.29 and 4.41 +/- 0.48 microg.h/mL, respectively. The difference in AUC(0-3h) was statistically significant (P = 0.04), but the difference in Cmax was not. CONCLUSIONS: Topical moxifloxacin was well absorbed. Maximum moxifloxacin concentrations were approximately 30 times higher than the median MICs for common pathogens in bacterial endophthalmitis, indicating that either regimen may provide sufficient concentrations to prevent postoperative endophthalmitis.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Aqueous Humor/metabolism , Aza Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Endophthalmitis/prevention & control , Quinolines/pharmacokinetics , Absorption , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aza Compounds/administration & dosage , Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Endophthalmitis/etiology , Endophthalmitis/metabolism , Female , Fluoroquinolones , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Moxifloxacin , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Ophthalmic Solutions/pharmacokinetics , Preoperative Care , Quinolines/administration & dosage
7.
Cornea ; 24(2): 201-5, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15725889

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the in vivo efficacy of topical moxifloxacin 0.5% versus ciprofloxacin 0.3% in the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis and topical moxifloxacin 0.5% versus vancomycin 50 mg/mL in the treatment of ciprofloxacin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis in rabbits. METHODS: Experimental bacterial keratitis was induced in rabbits by corneal intrastromal injection. Infection proceeded for 12 hours, after which topical antibiotics were applied hourly for 12 hours. Corneal homogenates were plated with serial dilutions for quantitative bacteriology. RESULTS: Both moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin performed significantly better than control in the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis (P=0.0046 and 0.0069, respectively); there were no significant differences between these 2 drugs in bactericidal activity (P=0.1120). Moxifloxacin performed significantly better than control in the treatment of ciprofloxacin-resistant MRSA (P=0.0321) keratitis, and vancomycin showed a trend toward statistical significance in performing better than control (P=0.0576); there were no significant differences between these 2 drugs in bactericidal activity (P=0.5205). CONCLUSIONS: Topical moxifloxacin 0.5% and ciprofloxacin 0.3% have similar efficacy in the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis in rabbits. Topical moxifloxacin 0.5% and vancomycin 50 mg/mL have similar efficacy in the treatment of ciprofloxacin-resistant MRSA keratitis in rabbits. These results suggest a potential value for topical moxifloxacin as a broad-spectrum agent in the treatment of bacterial keratitis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Eye Infections, Bacterial/drug therapy , Keratitis/drug therapy , Methicillin Resistance , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Animals , Aza Compounds/therapeutic use , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Colony Count, Microbial , Corneal Stroma/microbiology , Eye Infections, Bacterial/microbiology , Fluoroquinolones , Keratitis/microbiology , Moxifloxacin , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Rabbits , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Vancomycin/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...