Safety and efficacy of outpatient sleeve gastrectomy: 2534 cases performed in a single free-standing ambulatory surgical center.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is currently the most widely performed operation for treatment of morbid obesity. SG leads to significant weight loss and reduction in weight related comorbidities. Procedures performed in ambulatory surgical centers (ASC) can provide several advantages over hospital-based surgery. We present results of 2,534 consecutive patients who underwent SG in an ASC. OBJECTIVE: Assess the safety and efficacy of outpatient SG in a freestanding ASC. SETTING: Free-standing ASC, Eviva Bariatrics, Seattle WA. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively for all patients undergoing SG from January 2008 - January 2018, n = 2,534. Revisional procedures were not excluded from this study. Patients were excluded from the ASC if they weighed >450 pounds, if anticipated surgery time was > 2 hours, if the patient had impaired mobility limiting early ambulation, or if there were medical problems requiring postoperative monitoring beyond 23 hours. RESULTS: Mean age was 45.9 years. Mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 41.9. Mean operative time was 70 minutes. 30-day complications included 3 mortalities (0.12%), 60 (2.53%) re-admissions, 35 (1.42%), re-operations, and 31 (1.22%) direct transfers from the ASC to a nearby hospital. There were 25 staple line leaks (0.99%). There were no open conversions. At 6 months average excess body weight loss (EWL) was 56.3% and total weight loss (TWL) was 20.9% (n = 1,758/2,303). At 1 year, EWL was 70.1% and TWL was 26.4% (n = 1,199/2,125). CONCLUSION: With experienced surgeons, appropriate protocols, and a consistent operative team, SG can be performed safely in a free-standing ASC.

Does the future of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy lie in the outpatient surgery center? A retrospective study of the safety of 3162 outpatient sleeve gastrectomies.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a safe and effective procedure that can be performed as an outpatient procedure. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine whether same-day discharge LSG is safe when performed in an outpatient surgery center. SETTING: Outpatient surgery centers. METHODS: The medical records of 3162 patients who underwent primary LSG procedure by 21 surgeons at 9 outpatient surgery centers from January 2010 through February 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred sixty-two patients were managed with enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and were included in this analysis. The mean age and preoperative body mass index were 43.1 ± 10.8 years and 42.1 ± 7.1 kg/m2, respectively. Sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were seen in 14.4%, 13.5%, 24.7%, 30.4%, and 17.6% patients, respectively. The mean total operative time was 56.4 ± 16.9 minutes (skin to skin). One intraoperative complication (.03%) occurred. The hospital transfer rate was .2%. The 30-day follow-up rate was 85%. The postoperative outcomes were analyzed based on the available data. The 30-day readmission, reoperation, reintervention, and emergency room visit rates were .6%, .6%, .2%, and .1%, respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. The total short-term complication rate was 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Same-day discharge seems to be safe when performed in an outpatient surgery center in selected patients. It would appear that outpatient surgery centers are a viable option for patients with minimal surgical risks.

A multicenter study of routine versus selective intraoperative leak testing for sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy are dreaded complications. Many surgeons routinely perform an intraoperative leak test (IOLT) despite little evidence to validate the reliability, clinical benefit, and safety of this procedure. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of IOLT and if routine use has any benefit over selective use. SETTING: Eight teaching hospitals, including private, university, and military facilities. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective analysis over a 5-year period. The efficacy of the IOLT for identifying unsuspected staple line defects and for predicting postoperative leaks was evaluated. An anonymous survey was also collected reflecting surgeons' practices and beliefs regarding IOLT. RESULTS: From January 2010 through December 2014, 4284 patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy. Of these, 37 patients (.9%) developed a postoperative leak, and 2376 patients (55%) received an IOLT. Only 2 patients (0.08%) had a positive finding. Subsequently, 21 patients with a negative IOLT developed a leak. IOLT demonstrated a sensitivity of only 8.7%. There was a nonsignificant trend toward increased leak rates when an IOLT was performed versus when IOLT was not performed. Leak rates were not statistically different between centers that routinely perform IOLT versus those that selectively perform IOLT. CONCLUSIONS: Routine IOLT had very poor sensitivity and was negative in 91% of patients who later developed postoperative leaks. The use of IOLT was not associated with a decrease in the incidence of postoperative leaks, and routine IOLT had no benefit over selective leak testing. IOLT should not be used as a quality indicator or "best practice" for bariatric surgery.

High acuity sleeve gastrectomy patients in a free-standing ambulatory surgical center.

BACKGROUND: Procedures performed in ambulatory surgical centers (ASC) can provide several advantages over hospital-based surgery. Understandably, concerns have been raised regarding "high acuity" cases in the ASC setting. Recently the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) presented protocols for ASCs to follow, requiring them to perform only "low acuity" cases to be compliant with accreditation. OBJECTIVE: Assess the safety and efficacy of outpatient sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on the "high acuity patient" in a free-standing ASC. SETTING: Free-standing ASC, Eviva Bariatrics, Seattle, Washington. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively for all patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015, n = 1112. Of those patients, 120 were classified as "high acuity." RESULTS: Mean age was 51.7 years (24-73), mean body mass index was 42.4 (26.2-65.9). Mean operative time was 91 minutes. Five patients (4.2%) were readmitted within 30 days. Causes of re-admission were portal vein thrombosis (n = 2), intra-abdominal abscess (n = 1), infected hematoma (n = 1), and postoperative bleeding (n = 1). One patient (0.83%) was transferred from the ASC to a nearby hospital due to a postoperative bleed. One patient (0.83%) had a re-operation to evacuate a hematoma. One patient had a re-operation to wash out an infected hematoma. There were 0 confirmed staple line leaks. There were no open conversions and no deaths within 30 days or at 1 year. Follow-up was 83% (n = 100) at 6 months, and 65.0% at 1 year (n = 78). CONCLUSION: Criteria such as age, body mass index, or prior bariatric surgery did not reflect worse outcomes in a specialized ASC. With experienced surgeons, appropriate protocols, and a consistent operative team, SG can be performed safely in a free-standing ASC on select "high acuity" patients.

Laparoscopic simulation for surgical residents in Ethiopia: course development and results.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop and implement a laparoscopic skills curriculum in an Ethiopian surgical residency program. We hypothesized that residents would improve with practice. METHODS: We developed a laparoscopic curriculum by adapting existing training models. Six courses were conducted during 2012 and 2013 in a teaching hospital in Ethiopia. Eighty-eight surgical residents participated. Main outcome measures were laboratory task completion times and student survey responses. RESULTS: Students showed improvement in time needed to complete skills tasks with practice. Mean times improved for all 5 tasks (P ≤ .01). Students uniformly reported that the course was valuable. The curriculum is now taught and sustained by local faculty. CONCLUSIONS: The development and implementation of a collaborative and sustainable laparoscopic curriculum is possible in a low-resource environment. Such a curriculum can result in improved laparoscopic expertise, surgical trainee satisfaction, and may increase utilization of laparoscopy.

Incidental gastric mesenchymal tumors identified during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a well-tolerated and effective procedure for sustained weight loss and amelioration of weight-related co-morbidities. Rarely, unexpected pathology may be identified intraoperatively, which may alter the surgical plan. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are among the more frequently encountered tumors and pose a particular concern because of their malignant potential. We review our findings of incidental tumors encountered during 1415 consecutive SGs. METHODS: Abnormal pathology records from all patients who underwent SG at our institution between 2009 and 2014 were reviewed. Patient demographic characteristics and clinical characteristics, tumor characteristics, including immunohistochemistry, operative course, and patient follow-up were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 17 incidental gastric mesenchymal tumors identified (1.2%) in 1415 SG procedures. This included 12 GISTs (.8%), 2 schwannomas (.1%), and 3 leiomyomas (.3%). In the majority of cases (1210/1415), the gastric specimens were not reviewed by a pathologist because there were no gross abnormalities appreciated by the surgeon. The GISTs were between .3 and 2.9 cm, and all were low grade with negative margins. Patients with GISTs tended to be older (mean age 55±9.3 y) than the rest of the patients. There was no evidence of recurrence on follow-up. CONCLUSION: Incidental gastric mesenchymal tumors are rarely encountered during SG. The vast majority were GISTs with an incidence of .8% in this population. Concomitant SG and tumor resection were feasible, without compromising the objectives of each. Complete tumor excision is necessary for tumors>2 cm.

ASER core curriculum illustration project-volvulus: a rare cause of small bowel obstruction.

This is the ninth installment of a series that will highlight one case per publication issue from the bank of cases available online as part of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) educational resources. Our goal is to generate more interest in and use of our online materials. To view more cases online, please visit the ASER Core Curriculum and Recommendations for Study online at http://www.aseronline.org/curriculum/toc.htm .

Laparoscopic retrieval of intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon.

INTRODUCTION: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a well-tolerated, widely used contraceptive. A major but infrequent complication of the IUD is perforation of the uterus or cervix and migration of the device into the abdomen. Our case of laparoscopic retrieval of an IUD perforating the sigmoid colon illustrates this rare complication. METHODS: A 36-year-old woman with a history of IUD placement 4 years earlier presented with complaints of abdominal pain and bright red blood per rectum. She had conceived 9 months after IUD placement and suffered a spontaneous abortion requiring an evacuation of the retained products of conception. At presentation, she was afebrile with normal vital signs. Physical examination was significant for tenderness to palpation over the left lower quadrant. RESULTS: Computed tomography (CT) scans of the abdomen and pelvis showed a foreign body through the wall of the uterus and entering the colon. Colonoscopy revealed an IUD penetrating the sigmoid wall, and multiple failed attempts were made to remove the IUD colonoscopically. Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed that revealed an IUD perforating the uterus and entering the sigmoid. The IUD was manipulated free and removed, and a suture closed the sigmoid defect. The patient was discharged home on the first postoperative day without complication. CONCLUSIONS: The IUD is one of the most effective, safe, and economic contraceptive methods. Uterine perforation and intraperitoneal translocation is an unusual complication of an IUD. Perforation of hollow viscous is likely even less common. Confirmation of a "missing" IUD is mandatory if pregnancy occurs after IUD placement. Removal of a translocated IUD is recommended, and operative laparoscopy is the preferred method.

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a novel operation for the obese patient with achalasia.

Morbid obesity is a disease encompassing multiple, significant comorbidities. The only current, reliable, durable treatment of obesity is surgical intervention, most commonly gastric bypass. Achalasia, a swallowing disorder of esophageal motility and failure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to relax, is rarely seen in the morbidly obese patient. Treatment is directed at disruption of the LES to allow passage of food. As medical management usually fails in both disease processes, surgical treatment is often chosen. The patient with both morbid obesity and achalasia presents an unusual challenge for surgical treatment. The standard surgical approach for each disease does not address the other, and may have deleterious consequences on the other condition if approached unilaterally. We present the first case of a patient treated with a concomitant laparoscopic esophagogastric myotomy (LEM) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP).

Treatment of Achalasia.

Achalasia is a primary motility disorder of the esophagus that causes dysphagia. Normal esophageal motility and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function can not be restored; thus treatment is directed at decreasing the pressure or disrupting the muscle fibers of the LES to allow passage of ingested material. Effective therapy for achalasia can be broadly characterized as surgery based or endoscopy based. Medications (calcium channel blockers and nitrate derivatives) do not provide adequate relief of dysphagia and have substantial side effects, and thus are rarely used as long-term therapy. Botulinum toxin injection, a recently introduced endoscopic therapy, enjoyed much enthusiasm initially but was shown to have only transient effect and is now recommended only for poor operative candidates. The mainstay of therapy remains endoscopic dilation or laparoscopic esophagomyotomy (LEM) combined with an antireflux procedure. We have found that patients who can tolerate a laparoscopic abdominal surgery are best served with an LEM and Toupet (270 degrees ) posterior fundoplication. This provides good or excellent relief of dysphagia in 90% to 95% of patients with very little morbidity.