Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bioelectromagnetics ; 28(1): 69-71, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16988997

ABSTRACT

We examined the association between magnetic field (MF) exposure and the presence of prognostic risk factors among 482 children diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) between 1996 and 2001. Personal 24-h MF measurements were obtained for 412 children; 386 children were included in analyses. There were no trends seen between increasing exposure to MF and the presence of adverse clinical and tumor-specific prognostic factors. Our results suggest that exposure to MF is not associated with the presence of unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities in leukemic blast cells or with clinical factors at the time of diagnosis that predict poor survival.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Leukemia, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Prevalence , Prognosis , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
2.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 3(6): 323-33, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16718950

ABSTRACT

Contact currents from touching objects with different voltages can produce electric fields within the body that produce neurological and other biological effects. To begin measuring these exposures among electric utility workers, a new contact current meter (CCM) was tested in a pilot study at Southern California Edison. The CCM was worn for 82 full-shift measurements by 76 volunteers from eight occupations who did not work directly with energized electrical equipment. The volunteers were exposed to an average of 285.8 contact current events above the meter's 1-microA threshold, but most of these were electrostatic spark discharges. Fourteen employees experienced an average of 135.1 contact currents events whose primary frequency was 60 Hz. Using a circuit model of the human body, the average contact currents going from arm to arm was 9.8 microA (maximum = 178.0 microA), and the average going down the torso was 25.5 microA (maximum = 662.0). The maximum exposures were experienced by a technical support employee working in a substation. All measurements in this pilot study were below the 3000 microA maximum permissible exposure for contact currents set by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). Combining these current measurements with the results of high-resolution dosimetry, the internal electric fields averaged an estimated 1.7 mV/m in the heart (maximum = 21.0 mV/m), and 1.9 mV/m in the hematopoietic bone marrow in the torso (maximum = 56.5 mV/m). These internal electric fields from contact currents are below the basic restriction of 943 mV/m in the IEEE exposure standards but are above 1 mV/m, a level where biological effects have been often reported in laboratory studies. Safety concerns limited the measurements to de-energized equipment, so we did not obtain data on work in energized high-voltage environments, the most likely sources of high contact currents. This pilot study identified other improvements to the contact current meter that would make it better able to measure exposures in future health studies.


Subject(s)
Electric Conductivity , Electromagnetic Fields , Electrophysiology/instrumentation , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Body Burden , California , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Electrophysiology/standards , Humans , Maximum Allowable Concentration , Models, Biological , Occupational Exposure/standards , Pilot Projects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...