Differences in clinical and angiographic outcomes with different drug-eluting stents in Japanese patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse clinical outcomes, the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in Japanese patients and differences in effectiveness between different DES types remain unknown. METHODS AND SUBJECTS: Five-hundred and sixty-two consecutive patients (183 with DM, 379 without DM) with 676 lesions were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES, n=531; 160 DM group, 371 non-DM group) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES, n=145; 64 and 81, respectively). We assessed the initial and 8-month follow-up clinical and angiographic outcomes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical and lesion characteristics, although the pre-minimum luminal diameter was smaller in the DM group (p=0.016). The risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or recurrent angina pectoris, was higher in the DM group compared with the non-DM group (17.4% vs 9.5%, p=0.007). Among diabetic patients, although SES reduced late loss by 0.45 mm (p<0.001) and the binary restenosis rate by 66.4% (7.4% vs 22.0%, p<0.001) compared with PES at 8 months, it did not reduce target lesion revascularization or MACE, as in the non-DM group. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients have worse mid-term prognosis than non-diabetic patients undergoing PCI with DES. Although the superiority of SES in terms of late loss or restenosis may not play a clinically meaningful role in the treatment of diabetic patients, this phenomenon was independent of the presence of diabetes.

Five-year clinical outcomes after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse clinical outcomes; however, the long-term efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in diabetic patients remains uncertain. We evaluated 5-year clinical outcomes after SES implantation in 197 consecutive patients (85 in the DM group and 112 in the non-DM group), and 246 lesions (106 and 140, respectively). The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis or admission for congestive heart failure. Diabetic patient characteristics included 32 % who used insulin. The risk of congestive heart failure was significantly higher [20.0 vs. 5.4 %, odds ratio (OR) 4.417, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.659 to 11.759, p = 0.003] in the DM group compared with the non-DM group; however, MACE did not occur significantly more often (27.1 vs. 16.1 %, p = 0.060). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes was associated with congestive heart failure (OR 4.715, 95 % CI 1.743 to 12.759, p = 0.002) and multivessel disease was associated with major adverse cardiac events (OR 2.709, 95 % CI 1.053 to 6.965, p = 0.039). The cumulative rates (%) of TLR were as follows: after 1 year; 5.9 versus 5.4, 2 years; 7.1 versus 5.4, 3 years; 9.4 versus 7.1, 4 years; 9.4 versus 8.9, 5 years; 9.4 versus 8.9 (p = 0.652) in the DM group and the non-DM group, respectively. Diabetic patients had worse long-term prognosis in terms of congestive heart failure than non-diabetic patients undergoing PCI, even with SES. TLR was performed steadily for up to 5 years of follow-up following the late catch-up phenomenon both in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.