Proper use of MR imaging for evaluation of low back pain (radiologist' view).

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been recognized as a modality of choice in the evaluation of the spine. However, morphological abnormalities demonstrated by MR imaging do not always reflect low back pain (LBP). MR imaging should be interpreted with consideration of full clinical signs, symptoms, and other relevant background. At the same time, MR findings potentially relevant to LBP, such as morphological abnormalities of the disc, presence or absence of high intensity zone, abnormalities of the end plate and adjacent marrow signal, degree of nerve root compression, and degeneration of the facet joint, should be described without omission.

Redistribution in I-123 N-isopropyl-p iodoamphetamine single-photon emission computed tomography in cerebrovascular disease and the effects of rehabilitation.

We performed N-isopropyl-p (I-123) iodoamphetamine (IMP) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) on 28 patients with severe cerebrovascular disease before rehabilitation, and compared the degree of redistribution and the assessment of activities of daily living (ADL). We calculated a redistribution (RD) ratio in the central and peripheral parts of the lesions: RD ratio (c) and RD ratio (p). We classified the patients into four groups based on the degree of redistribution: complete: both RD ratio (c) and (p) > or = 75; peripheral: RD ratio (c) < 75, RD ratio (p) > or = 75; incomplete: both RD ratio (c) and (p) < 75 and at least one of RD ratio (c) or (p) > or = 25; no redistribution: both RD ratio (c) and (p) < 25. We assessed the ADL using the modified Barthel index (BI). deltaBI was defined as BI after rehabilitation-BI before rehabilitation (BIpost-BIpre). The deltaBI of the four groups were as follows: complete-redistribution group (40.8 +/- 22.8), peripheral-redistribution group (40.0 +/- 15.8), incomplete-redistribution group (27.2 +/- 22.6), no-redistribution group (8.8 +/- 12.3). The deltaBI of the complete and peripheral redistribution groups were significantly higher than that of the no-redistribution group. However, deltaBI was almost the same in the complete- and peripheral-redistribution groups. This suggests that the effect of rehabilitation might be closely related to the viability of the peripheral part of the lesion.