Non-contrast coronary artery wall and plaque imaging using inversion-recovery prepared steady-state free precession.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate whether three-dimensional (3D) single inversion-recovery prepared steady-state free precession (IR-SSFP) could characterize the coronary artery wall. METHODS: IR-SSFP was scanned on a 1.5-T MR scanner with a five element cardiac coil. One hundred and twenty-one subjects with known or suspected coronary artery disease who had undergone X-ray coronary angiography (XCA) underwent coronary artery wall imaging using IR-SSFP sequences. In each coronary segment, the detection of the coronary wall was categorized, and contrast (signal of plaque minus signal of blood in the aorta divided by the signal of plaque plus signal of blood in the aorta) was calculated. RESULTS: 422 of 517 segments (82%) were successfully visualized, and the detection scores tended to be higher at the proximal coronary artery when compared with other segments of the coronary artery. High contrast (contrast≥0.75) areas were observed in 62 of 218 segments with ≥50% coronary artery stenosis by XCA but also in 25 of 299 segments without ≥50% coronary stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: IR-SSFP provided good visualization of the coronary wall. This approach represents a promising noninvasive strategy for the assessment of the coronary artery wall.

Separate pulmonary artery and vein magnetic resonance angiography by use of an arterial spin labeling method.

A separate pulmonary vein (PV) is difficult to depict with the commonly used bright-blood magnetic resonance angiography method. Until now, no study has described the depiction of peripheral PVs without the artery. Our purpose in this study was to develop an arterial spin labeling (ASL)-based magnetic resonance angiography sequence to depict the pulmonary artery (PA) and vein separately. We developed such a sequence by using two inversion recovery pulses. The first pulse was non-selective, and the second pulse was selective and was applied to the aorta and heart. All studies were conducted on a 1.5-T clinical magnetic resonance system with six different inversion times for seven healthy volunteers. For evaluation, we categorized the inversion times by using visual scoring. Then, we used the magnitude image to evaluate the PA, and we used the real image to evaluate the PV. For the PA, an inversion time of 300 ms had the lowest score (1.43), and the score changed with increasing times; an inversion time of 1,100 ms had the highest score (3.85). For the PV, an inversion time of 300 ms had the highest score (2.68), and the score decreased with increasing times. The results indicated that the PA and vein could be depicted separately by the use of an ASL-based magnetic resonance angiography method. The optimal inversion times for the PV and artery were 300 and 1,100 ms, respectively.

[Studies of three-dimensional cardiac late gadolinium enhancement MRI at 3.0 Tesla].

Cardiac late Gadolinium enhancement MR imaging has been shown to allow assessment of myocardial viability in patients with ischemic heart disease. The current standard approach is a 3D inversion recovery sequence at 1.5 Tesla. The aims of this study were to evaluate the technique feasibility and clinical utility of MR viability imaging at 3.0 Tesla in patients with myocardial infarction and cardiomyopathy. In phantom and volunteer studies, the inversion time required to suppress the signal of interests and tissues was prolonged at 3.0 Tesla. In the clinical study, the average inversion time to suppress the signal of myocardium at 3.0 Tesla with respect to MR viability imaging at 1.5 Tesla was at 15 min after the administration of contrast agent (304.0+/-29.2 at 3.0 Tesla vs. 283.9+/-20.9 at 1.5 Tesla). The contrast between infarction and viable myocardium was equal at both field strengths (4.06+/-1.30 at 3.0 Tesla vs. 4.42+/-1.85 at 1.5 Tesla). Even at this early stage, MR viability imaging at 3.0 Tesla provides high quality images in patients with myocardial infarction. The inversion time is significantly prolonged at 3.0 Tesla. The contrast between infarction and viable myocardium at 3.0 Tesla are equal to 1.5 Tesla. Further investigation is needed for this technical improvement, for clinical evaluation, and for limitations.