Clinical significance of a novel reticulocyte-based erythropoietin resistance index in HD patients: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) is an indicator of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) responsiveness and is typically calculated using Hb. However, Hb does not directly reflect ESA-induced erythropoiesis because of its long-term nature. We thus designed a novel ERI calculated with reticulocyte Hb (RetHb), a real-time index, and investigated its association with mortality in HD patients. METHODS: We calculated the ERI using the change in RetHb before and after ESA administration (ERIΔRetHb ) and retrospectively analyzed its association with 3-year all-cause mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included. Patients with the highest ERIΔRetHb had the worst prognosis according to the Kaplan-Meier survival curves (Log-rank p = 0.02). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the ERIΔRetHb was significantly and independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 9.82, 95% CI [1.50, 64.41], p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The ERIΔRetHb was significantly and independently associated with all-cause mortality in HD patients.

Potential effective treatment of shortening continuous erythropoietin receptor activator treatment interval combined with iron supplementation in hemodialysis patients.

Our previous randomized controlled trial comparing the total dose of weekly versus biweekly continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) therapy to maintain optimal hemoglobin (Hb) levels showed no significant differences between the two therapies. This post-hoc analysis assessed whether the total dose of weekly versus biweekly CERA therapy to maintain Hb levels among HD patients differed among groups with or without iron supplementation. Of 107 patients, 40 received intravenous iron supplementation due to iron deficiency (iron group) and 67 did not (non-iron group). In the iron group, the weekly therapy tended to require a lower total CERA dose compared with the biweekly therapy (274 ± 274 vs 381 ± 223 µg/12 weeks, P = 0.051). Changes in circulating hepcidin levels, a negative regulator of intestinal iron uptake, after 2 weeks of CERA treatment were significantly lower in the weekly therapy compared with the biweekly therapy (-4.2 ± 6.3 vs 11.1 ± 7.3 ng/mL, P = 0.015). In the non-iron group, there were no significant differences in total CERA dose or changes in hepcidin levels between the two therapies. Shortening the CERA treatment interval combined with iron supplementation may lead to the more efficient treatment of HD patients with iron deficiency.

Comparison of the effects of weekly and biweekly intravenous CERA administration on erythropoiesis: A randomized controlled trial.

Although continuous erythropoietin receptor activators (CERAs) are widely used erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for correcting renal anemia in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD), few reports have examined weekly CERA administration. In this randomized controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and changes in the parameters of iron metabolism and erythropoiesis between weekly and biweekly CERA administration. In total, 120 patients undergoing maintenance HD were randomized to the weekly or biweekly group. The primary end point was the total CERA dose needed to maintain the target hemoglobin (Hb) levels during a 12-week evaluation period. There was no significant difference in the total dose between the weekly and biweekly groups (median 175.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 93.8-337.5] µg/12 weeks vs. 300.0 [IQR 125.0-375.0] µg/12 weeks, P = .18). The mean Hb levels during the evaluation period were 10.9 ± 0.8 g/dL in the weekly group and 10.7 ± 0.8 g/dL in the biweekly group (P = .25). Weekly CERA administration was well tolerated. Weekly CERA administration similarly managed anemia as biweekly administration in patients undergoing HD.