Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Transplant Proc ; 52(10): 3009-3016, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32576473

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The central focus of anesthesia management in kidney transplantation is to avoid hypotensive episodes and maintain adequate perfusion pressure to the graft. However, it is not clear whether there is an optimal systolic blood pressure (SBP) level after reperfusion for living-donor transplant outcomes. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of SBP after reperfusion on early graft function in living-donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 315 patients who underwent living-donor kidney transplantation from January 2013 to December 2017. We divided the patients into 4 groups according to SBP after reperfusion and compared the postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and creatinine. RESULTS: There were no differences in the postoperative recovery of kidney graft function in the first 7 postoperative days among the 4 SBP groups after reperfusion. However, the urine output after reperfusion was significantly less in the group with SBP < 140 mm Hg after reperfusion compared with the remaining 3 groups in a multivariate analysis (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in early graft function were observed among the 4 SBP groups. SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg after reperfusion, which is linked to greater urine output, can be beneficial in terms of long-term graft survival and mortality.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/physiology , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Recovery of Function/physiology , Adult , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate/physiology , Humans , Kidney/physiology , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
3.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 18(1): 167, 2018 11 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30414607

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although propofol is a common anesthetic agent for the induction of general anesthesia, hemodynamic fluctuations are occasionally prominent during induction/intubation. The aims of this study were to determine the influential factors on enhanced hemodynamic fluctuation and to establish a prediction formula to quickly determine the dose of propofol to protect against hemodynamic fluctuations. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study patients (n = 2097) were 18 years or older. They underwent general anesthesia induction using propofol and orotracheal intubation for non-cardiac surgery at Kyushu University Hospital during April 2015 to March 2016. Preoperative patient clinical information was collected from anesthesia preoperative evaluation records. Intraoperative data were obtained from computerized anesthesia records. If patients' post-induction mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) decreased or increased 30% or more from their pre-induction MAP, they were determined to have enhanced hemodynamic fluctuations. Unconditional logistic regression was used to assess the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to simultaneously examine the direct and indirect effect (path coefficient = r) of potential variables. RESULTS: In the SEM analysis, age was significantly associated with enhanced hemodynamic fluctuations (adjusted odds ratio = 1.008, 95% CI = 1.001-1.015, P = 0.03). Age (path coefficient (r) = - 0.0113, 95% CI = - 0.0126-0.010, P < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) (r = - 0.0788, 95% CI = - 0.1431-0.0145, P = 0.02), sex (r = 0.057, 95% CI = 0.0149-0.9906, P = 0.01), and fentanyl dose (r = 0.1087, 95% CI = 0.0707-0.1467, P < 0.001) influenced the dose of propofol in induction. The prediction formula of "Propofol dose (mg) = [2.374 - 0.0113 × age (year) - 0.0788 (if ASA-PS 3 or 4) + 0.057 (if female) + 0.1087 × fentanyl dose (µg/kg)] × body weight (kg)" was derived. CONCLUSIONS: Age was associated with hemodynamic fluctuations in induction. Although the prediction formula is considered to be acceptable, future studies validating whether it can decrease patients' risk of enhanced hemodynamic fluctuations in clinical situations are necessary.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General/methods , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Hemodynamics/physiology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia, General/trends , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
4.
A A Case Rep ; 7(8): 169-171, 2016 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27467902

ABSTRACT

We present a case of an esophageal submucosal hematoma that developed after endovascular treatment for coil embolization for an unruptured cerebral aneurysm. The patient had received antiplatelet therapy before surgery and anticoagulation therapy during surgery. The orogastric tube was removed at case end with sustained negative pressure. After surgery, the patient reported chest and back pain and was diagnosed with an esophageal submucosal hematoma. The hematoma might have been related to the gastric tube insertion or removal. Providers should keep in mind the possibility of this complication when a patient who was given antithrombotic therapy reports chest or back pain after surgery.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Esophageal Mucosa/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Aged , Female , Hematoma/etiology , Humans
5.
Masui ; 65(1): 93-6, 2016 Jan.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27004394

ABSTRACT

Compression and obstruction of the duodenum can occur after surgical correction of spinal scoliosis. We report a case of 15-year-old girl who developed superior mesenteric artery syndrome (SMAS) following scoliosis surgery. On the 4th postoperative day, the patient complained of nausea and vomiting, which was considered as side effects of opioids as she was treated with intravenous fentanyl infusion with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Nasogastric tube was placed and background infusion rate of the PCA was tapered. On the 5th postoperative day, fentanyl infusion was stopped, but she complained of persistent nausea and vomiting. Barium upper gastrointestinal series and abdominal echography revealed compression in the third portion of the duodenum between the superior mesenteric artery and aorta on the 7th postoperative day. She responded to conservative treatment (nutritional and fluid supplementation), which lasted about two weeks. She was discharged home on the 51st postoperative day. SMAS is rare but sometimes carries serious complications. Vomiting following scoliosis surgery should be examined thoroughly including the possibility of SMAS, especially during postoperative pain management with opioids (i. e., IV-PCA with fentanyl). Early diagnosis and institution of appropriate conservative therapy is essential to reduce the likelihood of future complications and avoid the need for surgery.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Scoliosis/surgery , Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome/etiology , Adolescent , Female , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...