Comparison of pneumonia severity scores for patients diagnosed with pneumonia in emergency department.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: : Sepsis due to pneumonia or pneumonia itself is one of the main causes of deaths in patients despite the advanced treatment methods. The optimal prognostic tool in pneumonia is still not clear. This study was aimed to compare the pneumonia severity scores and the possibility of using the new scores in patients who were diagnosed with pneumonia in the emergency department. METHODS: : Demographic data, laboratory and imaging results, confusion, elevated blood urea nitrogen, respiratory rate and blood pressure plus age ≥65 yr (CURB-65), pneumonia severity index (PSI), national early warning score (NEWS), NEWS-lactate (NEWS-L) scores, hospitalization, referral, discharge and 30-day mortality of patients who were diagnosed with pneumonia in emergency department were recorded. RESULTS: : A total of 250 patients were included in the study. The most successful score in predicted mortality was found to be NEWS-L. This was followed by NEWS, CURB-65 and PSI, respectively. Most successful scores in anticipation of admission to the intensive care unit were NEWS-L followed by NEWS. This was followed by CURB-65 and PSI scores, respectively. The most successful score in anticipation of hospital admission was NEWS-L, followed by NEWS, CURB-65 and PSI, respectively. There was a significant difference between all pneumonia severity scores of the patients who died and survived within 30 days. There was a significant difference between the scores of patients in intensive care unit (ICU) and service, compared to non-ICU patients. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: : NEWS-L score was found to be the most successful score in predicting mortality, ICU admission and hospitalization requirement. Both NEWS-L and NEWS scores can be used in determining the mortality, need for hospitalization and intensive care of the patients with pneumonia in the emergency department.

Relationship between right ventricular dilatation and blood copeptin levels in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to investigate the importance of copeptin in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism, detection of right ventricular dilatation and clinical severity and prognosis of pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the study three groups were created; Group 1: Pulmonary embolism patients with right ventricular dilatation in echocardiography, Group 2: Pulmonary embolism patients without right ventricular dilatation in echocardiography, Group 3: Healthy people. Five mL of venous blood was collected for the measurement of serum copeptin from the patients and control group. D-dimer and troponin were studied with routine blood samples. Complaints, symptom and physical examination findings, tomography and echocardiography results, laboratory results of patients and treatments they received were recorded for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Copeptin levels of acute pulmonary embolism patients were significantly higher than healthy individuals (P < 0.001). Copeptin values of Group 1 patients were significantly higher than Group 2 patients and Group 3 patients (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference the levels of copeptin, D-dimer and troponin between patients with right ventricular dilatation and patients without right ventricular dilatation (P < 0.05). AUC value in detecting right ventricular dilatation of copeptin was found to be 0.82, while specificity was 83.3% and sensitivity was 69.6%. Copeptin, D-dimer and troponin levels of patients with increased pulmonary artery pressure were statistically significantly higher than patients with normal pulmonary artery pressure (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Copeptin can be used in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism and in the detection of right ventricular dilatation in pulmonary embolism.