Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
1.
Am J Transplant ; 18(6): 1397-1407, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29206349

ABSTRACT

Prior studies demonstrate that most living kidney donors (LKDs) report no adverse psychosocial outcomes; however, changes in psychosocial functioning at the individual donor level have not been routinely captured. We studied psychosocial outcomes predonation and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postdonation in 193 LKDs and 20 healthy controls (HCs). There was minimal to no mood disturbance, body image concerns, fear of kidney failure, or life dissatisfaction, indicating no incremental changes in these outcomes over time and no significant differences between LKDs and HCs. The incidence of any new-onset adverse outcomes postdonation was as follows: mood disturbance (16%), fear of kidney failure (21%), body image concerns (13%), and life dissatisfaction (10%). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that LKDs with more mood disturbance symptoms, higher anxiety about future kidney health, low body image, and low life satisfaction prior to surgery were at highest risk of these same outcomes postdonation. It is important to note that some LKDs showed improvement in psychosocial functioning from pre- to postdonation. Findings support the balanced presentation of psychosocial risks to potential donors as well as the development of a donor registry to capture psychosocial outcomes beyond the mandatory 2-year follow-up period in the United States.


Subject(s)
Affect , Body Image , Decision Making , Fear , Kidney Transplantation , Living Donors/psychology , Personal Satisfaction , Renal Insufficiency/psychology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Pediatr Transplant ; 21(5)2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28397368

ABSTRACT

Kidneys from very small pediatric donors (age <5 years, weight <21 kg) may be a means to increase the donor pool for pediatric recipients. Transplantation of small pediatric kidneys is more commonly performed in adult recipients due to the increased risks of technical complications, thrombosis, and early graft failure. While these risks are abrogated in adult recipients by limiting the donor weight to ≥10 kg and using the EB technique, it is unknown whether pediatric recipients achieve comparable results. US national data were assessed for all first-time, deceased-donor, kidney-only pediatric recipients, 1/1996-10/2013, who received very small pediatric donor grafts or grafts from ideal adult donors. We identified 57 pediatric EB, 110 pediatric SK, and 2350 adult transplants. The primary outcome was 3-year all-cause graft survival. Kaplan-Meier curves showed worse outcomes for pediatric grafts compared to adult ideal grafts (P=.042). On multivariate analysis, pediatric recipients of SK grafts had significantly higher HRs (aHR 2.01, 95% CI 1.34-3.00) and pediatric recipients of EB grafts had somewhat higher non-significant HRs (1.57; 95% CI 0.88-2.79) for graft survival. These results suggest cautionary use of very small pediatric donors as a source to expand the donor pool for pediatric candidates.


Subject(s)
Body Weight , Donor Selection/methods , Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Young Adult
3.
Am J Transplant ; 16(3): 869-76, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26845630

ABSTRACT

Some living kidney donors (LKDs) incur costs associated with donation, although these costs are not well characterized in the United States. We collected cost data in the 12 mo following donation from 182 LKDs participating in the multicenter prospective Kidney Donor Outcomes Cohort (KDOC) Study. Most LKDs (n = 167, 92%) had one direct cost or more following donation, including ground transportation (86%), health care (41%), meals (53%), medications (36%), lodging (23%), and air transportation (12%). LKDs missed 33 072 total work hours, 40% of which were unpaid and led to $302 175 in lost wages (mean $1660). Caregivers lost $68 655 in wages (mean $377). Although some donors received financial assistance, 89% had a net financial loss in the 12-mo period, with one-third (33%) reporting a loss exceeding $2500. Financial burden was higher for those with greater travel distance to the transplant center (Spearman's ρ = 0.26, p < 0.001), lower household income (Spearman's ρ = -0.25, p < 0.001), and more unpaid work hours missed (Spearman's ρ = 0.52, p < 0.001). Achieving financial neutrality for LKDs must be an immediate priority for the transplant community, governmental agencies, insurance companies, nonprofit organizations, and society at large.


Subject(s)
Health Expenditures/trends , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/economics , Living Donors , Nephrectomy/economics , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/economics , Adult , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prognosis , Prospective Studies
4.
Am J Transplant ; 15(9): 2387-93, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25943721

ABSTRACT

Limited information exists on the predonation costs incurred by eventual living kidney donors (LKDs). Expenses related to completion of the donation evaluation were collected from 194 LKDs participating in the multi-center, prospective Kidney Donor Outcomes Cohort (KDOC) Study. Most LKDs (n = 187, 96%) reported one or more direct costs, including ground transportation (80%), healthcare (24%), lodging (17%) and air transportation (14%), totaling $101 484 (USD; mean = $523 ± 942). Excluding paid vacation or sick leave, donor and companion lost wages totaled $35 918 (mean = $187 ± 556) and $14 378 (mean = $76 ± 311), respectively. One-third of LKDs used paid vacation or sick leave to avoid incurring lost wages. Few LKDs reported receiving financial support from the transplant candidate (6%), transplant candidate's family (3%), a nonprofit organization (3%), the National Living Donor Assistance Center (7%), or transplant center (3%). Higher total costs were significantly associated with longer distance traveled to the transplant center (p < 0.001); however, total costs were not associated with age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, marital status, insurance status, or transplant center. Moderate predonation direct and indirect costs are common for adults who complete the donation evaluation. Potential LKDs should be advised of these possible costs, and the transplant community should examine additional strategies to reimburse donors for them.


Subject(s)
Costs and Cost Analysis , Health Expenditures/trends , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/economics , Living Donors , Nephrectomy/economics , Tissue and Organ Procurement/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
5.
Am J Transplant ; 15(9): 2394-403, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25902877

ABSTRACT

Follow-up care for living kidney donors is an important responsibility of the transplant community. Prior reports indicate incomplete donor follow-up information, which may reflect both donor and transplant center factors. New UNOS regulations require reporting of donor follow-up information by centers for 2 years. We utilized national SRTR data to evaluate donor and center-level factors associated with completed follow-up for donors 2008-2012 (n = 30 026) using multivariable hierarchical logistic models. We compared center follow-up compliance based on current UNOS standards using adjusted and unadjusted models. Complete follow-up at 6, 12, and 24 months was 67%, 60%, and 50% for clinical and 51%, 40%, and 30% for laboratory data, respectively, but have improved over time. Donor risk factors for missing laboratory data included younger age 18-34 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.03, 1.58-2.60), black race (AOR = 1.17, 1.05-1.30), lack of insurance (AOR = 1.25, 1.15-1.36), lower educational attainment (AOR = 1.19, 1.06-1.34), >500 miles to center (AOR = 1.78, 1.60-1.98), and centers performing >40 living donor transplants/year (AOR = 2.20, 1.21-3.98). Risk-adjustment moderately shifted classification of center compliance with UNOS standards. There is substantial missing donor follow-up with marked variation by donor characteristics and centers. Although follow-up has improved over time, targeted efforts are needed for donors with selected characteristics and at centers with higher living donor volume. Adding adjustment for donor factors to policies regulating follow-up may function to provide more balanced evaluation of center efforts.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care , Guideline Adherence/standards , Kidney Transplantation , Living Donors , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypertension , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Tissue and Organ Procurement , United States , Young Adult
8.
Am J Transplant ; 14(9): 2037-47, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25098499

ABSTRACT

Reports of kidney transplantation (KTX) in recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV+), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV+) or coinfection often do not provide adequate adjustment for donor risk factors. We evaluated paired deceased-donor kidneys (derived from the same donor transplanted to different recipients) in which one kidney was transplanted into a patient with viral infection (HCV+, n = 1700; HIV+, n = 243) and the other transplanted into a recipient without infection (HCV- n = 1700; HIV- n = 243) using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data between 2000 and 2013. On multivariable analysis (adjusted for recipient risk factors), HCV+ conferred increased risks of death-censored graft survival (DCGS) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.47) and patient survival (aHR 1.24, 95% CI 1.06-1.45) compared with HCV-. HIV+ conferred similar DCGS (aHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.48-1.51) and patient survival (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.39-1.64) compared with HIV-. HCV coinfection was a significant independent risk factor for DCGS (aHR 2.33; 95% CI 1.06, 5.12) and patient survival (aHR 2.88; 95% CI 1.35, 6.12). On multivariable analysis, 1-year acute rejection was not associated with HCV+, HIV+ or coinfection. Whereas KTX in HIV+ recipients were associated with similar outcomes relative to noninfected recipients, HCV monoinfection and, to a greater extent, coinfection were associated with poor patient and graft survival.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/surgery , Hepatitis C/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Adult , Female , HIV Infections/complications , Hepatitis C/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Proportional Hazards Models , Tissue Donors
9.
Am J Transplant ; 13(9): 2433-40, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23919381

ABSTRACT

UNOS guidelines provide inadequate discriminatory criteria for kidneys that should be transplanted as single (SKT) versus dual (DKT). We evaluated the utility of the kidney donor risk index (KDRI) to define kidneys with better outcomes when transplanted as dual. Using SRTR data from 1995 to 2010 of de novo KTX recipients of adult deceased-donor kidneys, we examined outcomes of SKT and DKT stratified by KDRI group ≤1.4 (n = 49 294), 1.41-1.8 (n = 15 674), 1.81-2.2 (n = 6523) and >2.2 (n = 2791). DKT of kidneys with KDRI >2.2 was associated with significantly better overall graft survival [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.96] compared to single kidneys with KDRI >2.2. DKT was associated with significantly decreased odds of delayed graft function (top 2 KDRI categories) and significantly decreased odds of 1-year serum creatinine level >2 mg/dL (top 3 KDRI categories). Among SKT and DKT from KDRI >2.2 there were 16.1 and 13.9 graft losses per 100 patient follow-up years, respectively. KDRI >2.2 is a useful discriminatory cut-off for the determination of graft survival benefit with the use of DKT; however, the benefit of increased graft years was less than half of single kidneys from donors in the same KDRI range.


Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Adult , Aged , Delayed Graft Function , Female , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Tissue Donors , Treatment Outcome
11.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 15(3): 268-75, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23421817

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Placement of ureteral stents at the time of renal transplantation is thought to decrease the incidence of postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leakage and stenosis. However, stents may also predispose to post-transplantation urinary tract infection, which can lead to increased risks of graft dysfunction, sepsis, and death. The aim of this study was to analyze the risk of post-transplantation bacteriuria with ureteral stent placement in renal allograft recipients. METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted to investigate the incidence of bacteriuria in all renal allograft recipients transplanted between January 2007 and March 2009. Recipients were categorized as in the nonstent group (NSTG) or the stent group (STG). Stent removal was performed per protocol at 6 weeks, and all patients were followed for at least 1 year post transplantation. In the NSTG, the incidence of bacteriuria was assessed at 0-6, 6-12, and 12 weeks to 1 year post transplantation. In the STG, bacteriuria was assessed prior to stent removal, 6 weeks after stent removal, and thereafter until 1 year post transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 395 renal allograft recipients, 183 in the NSTG and 212 in the STG groups, were studied. The overall incidence of bacteriuria within 1 year post transplantation was similar between NSTG and STG (28.0 vs. 24.0%, P = 0.38). No difference was found in the incidence of bacteriuria when NSTG and STG were compared at 0-6 weeks or prior to stent removal (9.7% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.81), at 6-12 weeks, or 6 weeks after stent removal (6.7% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.75), and thereafter for 1 year post transplantation (13.3% vs. 10.8%, P = 0.46). The incidence of graft failure at 1 year was similar in NSTG and STG (6.2% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.6). Urinary anastomotic leakage occurred in none of the NSTG and 2 of the STG recipients. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for bacteriuria were female recipient gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-4.3, P = 0.001), delayed graft function (DGF) (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.8, P = 0.01), and postoperative Foley catheterization for >5 days (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.3-17.6, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Independent risk factors for bacteriuria following kidney transplantation include DGF, prolonged postoperative Foley catheterization, and recipient female gender, but not placement of ureteral stents.


Subject(s)
Bacteriuria/epidemiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Stents/adverse effects , Ureter/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bacteriuria/etiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Young Adult
12.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 15(2): 202-7, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23331475

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: BK virus (BKV) infection is an important cause of kidney transplant dysfunction. A possible association of double-J ureteral stent placement and BK viremia has been suggested in previous studies; however, risk factors for BK are incompletely understood. We aimed to determine if stent placement is an independent risk factor for BK viremia. METHODS: Data were collected on consecutive kidney-only transplant recipients between December 1, 2006 and June 30, 2010. All patients had at least 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Of 600 consecutive kidney transplants, BK viremia within the first post-transplant year was detected in 93 patients (15.5%); in 70 of these cases, the peak BKV polymerase chain reaction was ≥10,000 copies/mL. By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for BK viremia were recipient age (P = 0.02) and stent placement (P = 0.03). Stents were placed in 49.2% and removed at a median of 46 days (range: 11-284) post transplantation; removals occurred within 0-30, 30-60, 60-90, 90-120, 120-150, and >150 days post transplantation in 18.4%, 67.2%, 10.5%, 2.4%, 1.0%, and 0.3% of cases, respectively. No association was found of BK viremia with stent duration >46 days (P = 0.70) or by the 6-level groupings (P = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Although we observed a significant association of BK viremia with stent placement, no dose-dependent effect was seen.


Subject(s)
BK Virus/isolation & purification , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Polyomavirus Infections/etiology , Stents/adverse effects , Tumor Virus Infections/etiology , Viremia/etiology , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Urologic Diseases/prevention & control
13.
Am J Transplant ; 11(12): 2657-64, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22051325

ABSTRACT

Increased cold ischemia time (CIT) predisposes to delayed graft function (DGF). DGF is considered a risk factor for graft failure after kidney transplantation, but DGF has multiple etiologies. To analyze the risk of CIT-induced DGF on graft survival, we evaluated paired deceased-donor kidneys (derived from the same donor transplanted to different recipients) in which one donor resulted in DGF and the other did not, using national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data between 2000 and 2009. Of 54 565 kidney donors, 15 833 were excluded for mate kidney non-transplantation, 27 340 because both or neither kidney developed DGF and 2310 for same/unknown CIT. The remaining 9082 donors (18 164 recipients) were analyzed. The adjusted odds (aOR) of DGF were significantly higher when CIT was longer by ≥ 1 h (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.7-2.0), ≥ 5 h (aOR 2.5, 95% CI 2.3-2.9), ≥ 10 h (aOR 3.3, 95% CI 2.7-2.9) and ≥ 15 h (aOR 4.4, 95% CI 3.4-5.8) compared to shorter CIT transplants. In the multivariable models adjusted for recipient characteristics, graft survival between paired donor transplants, with and without DGF, were similar. These results suggest that DGF, specifically induced by prolonged CIT, has limited bearing on long-term outcomes, which may have important implications for kidney utilization.


Subject(s)
Cold Ischemia , Delayed Graft Function/mortality , Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Organ Preservation , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Tissue Donors , Tissue and Organ Harvesting
14.
Am J Transplant ; 11(12): 2647-56, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21906257

ABSTRACT

Delays in expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney placement increases cold ischemia times (CIT) potentially leading to discard. The effect of increased CIT on ECD kidney transplant outcomes is unknown. We evaluated paired ECD kidneys (derived from the same donor transplanted to different recipients) from the SRTR registry transplanted between 1995 and 2009 (n = 17,514). To test the effect of CIT, we excluded paired transplants with the same CIT (n = 3286). Of 14,230 recipients (7115 donors) the median difference in CIT was 5 h (Q1 = 3 h, Q3 = 9 h). Delayed graft function (DGF) was significantly more likely between pairs with greater CIT (35% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) including substantially higher rates for CIT differences ≥ 15 h (42%). Overall graft loss was not significantly different between recipients with higher CIT relative to paired donor recipients with lower CIT (p = 0.47) or for pairs with differences of 1-3 h (p = 0.90), 4-9 h (p = 0.41), 10-14 h (p = 0.36) or ≥ 15 h (p = 0.10). Results were consistent in multivariable models adjusted for recipient factors. Although increasing cold ischemia time is a risk factor for DGF among ECD kidney transplants, there is no effect on graft survival which may suggest an important utility for donor kidneys that may not currently be considered viable.


Subject(s)
Cold Ischemia , Delayed Graft Function/mortality , Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Organ Preservation , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate , HLA Antigens/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Tissue Donors , Tissue and Organ Harvesting
15.
Am J Transplant ; 11(1): 77-85, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21199349

ABSTRACT

Outcomes of locally rejected kidneys transplanted at other centers (import KTX) are unknown. SRTR data from 2000 to 2009 of deceased-donor KTXs excluding 0-mismatch, paybacks, and other mandatory shares were compared by location of KTX at local (n = 48,165), regional (n = 4428) or national (n = 4104) centers using multivariable regression models. Compared to nonmandatory share local transplants, import KTX were associated with significantly higher overall risks of patient death (regional aHR 1.15, p < 0.01; national aHR 1.14, p < 0.01), and graft failure (regional aHR 1.17, p < 0.01; national aHR1.21, p < 0.01). In paired analysis, the risk of delayed graft function (DGF) for import KTX was higher compared to locally transplanted mates (regional aOR 1.53, p < 0.01, national aOR 2.14, p < 0.01); however, despite longer ischemia times, overall graft survival was similar. Mean cold ischemia times (CIT) pre- and post-DonorNet were similar for local and regional transplants, but significantly higher for national transplants (28.9 ± 9.9 vs. 29.9 ± 9.7 h, respectively, p = 0.01). Import KTX is associated with increased risks of graft failure, patient death and DGF. In the era of DonorNet cold ischemia times of kidneys imported to regional centers are not improved compared to pre-DonorNet; and, those of national centers are significantly prolonged.


Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation , Tissue and Organ Procurement/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Cold Ischemia , Delayed Graft Function , Female , Graft Rejection , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Living Donors/supply & distribution , Male , Middle Aged , Risk , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
17.
Transplant Proc ; 42(7): 2794-6, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20832590

ABSTRACT

Mucormycosis is an uncommon but frequently fatal infectious complication after solid organ transplantation. We describe successful treatment of invasive mucormycosis in a liver transplant recipient by wound debridement, a right above-elbow arm amputation, and antifungal medications. Early recognition, prompt operative intervention, and initiation of an appropriate antifungal treatment are very important in the management of mucormycosis, a potentially life-threatening infection.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/methods , Arm/surgery , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Mucormycosis/surgery , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic/surgery , Male
18.
Transplant Proc ; 42(5): 1413-20, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20620446

ABSTRACT

Despite a variety of urinary tract reconstructive techniques, urinary complications are the most frequent technical adverse event following renal transplantation. These complications can be associated with substantial morbidity and generate excess cost. In this review we comprehensively discuss 4 techniques of ureteroneocystostomy, compare complications, and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each technique focusing on 4 specific urologic complications: urine leak, ureteric obstruction, hematuria, and symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Cystostomy/adverse effects , Cystostomy/methods , Hematuria/epidemiology , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Risk Factors , Ureter/surgery , Ureteral Obstruction/epidemiology , Ureteral Obstruction/etiology , Ureteral Obstruction/surgery , Urinary Bladder/physiology , Urinary Bladder/physiopathology , Urinary Bladder/surgery , Urinary Tract/surgery , Urologic Diseases/epidemiology , Urologic Diseases/etiology , Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/epidemiology , Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/etiology , Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/surgery
19.
Am J Transplant ; 9(12): 2745-51, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20021480

ABSTRACT

Kidney transplantation (KTX) from small pediatric donors is performed as single or en bloc. Criteria to determine when to split pediatric donor kidneys and transplant as singles are not well established. Data reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient for donors <10 yrs from 1995 to 2007 were reviewed (n = 5079). Donors were categorized by weight group by 5 kg increments and solitary (n = 3503) versus en bloc (n = 1576). The primary outcome was overall graft survival. Results were compared as adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) relative to ideal standard criteria donors (SCDs) (defined as age 18-39 without other risk factors), non-ideal SCDs (all other SCDs) and expanded criteria donors (age 50-59 with other risk factors or age >or=60). Single KTX from donors >or= 35 kg conferred a similar risk of graft survival as ideal SCDs. Of donors 10-34 kg, risks of en bloc KTX were similar to ideal and risks of single KTX to non-ideal SCDs; single and en bloc KTXs had 7.9 and 5.2 graft losses per 100 follow-up years, respectively. Single KTX from donors >35 kg are similar to ideal SCDs. Single KTX from donors 10-35 kg are similar to non-ideal SCDs. From a resource perspective, pediatric donors 10-35 kg used as singles offer more cumulative graft years than when used en bloc.


Subject(s)
Body Weight , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Tissue Donors , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Survival , Humans , Infant , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Kidney Transplantation/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Registries , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
20.
Am J Transplant ; 9(2): 367-73, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19178415

ABSTRACT

Utilization and long-term outcomes of kidneys from donors with elevated terminal serum creatinine (sCr) levels have not been reported. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1995 to 2007, recipient outcomes of kidneys from adult donors were evaluated stratified by standard criteria (SCD; n = 82 262) and expanded criteria (ECD; n = 16 978) donor type and by sCr 2.0 mg/dL. Discard rates for SCDs were ascertained. The relative risk of graft loss was similar for recipients of SCD kidneys with sCr of 1.6-2.0 and >2.0 mg/dL, compared to 2.0 mg/dL (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 7.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5-7.6) and 1.6-2.0 mg/dL (AOR 2.7; CI 2.5-2.9) relative to sCr

Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Delayed Graft Function , Graft Survival/physiology , Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Tissue Donors , Adolescent , Adult , Creatinine/blood , Donor Selection , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...