Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2086: 27-60, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31707666

ABSTRACT

In clinical gene transfer applications, lentiviral vectors (LV) have rapidly become the primary means to achieve permanent and stable expression of a gene of interest or alteration of gene expression in target cells. This status can be attributed primarily to the ability of the LV to (1) transduce dividing as well as quiescent cells, (2) restrict or expand tropism through envelope pseudo-typing, and (3) regulate gene expression within different cell lineages through internal promoter selection. Recent progress in viral vector design such as the elimination of unnecessary viral elements, split packaging, and self-inactivating vectors has established a significant safety profile for these vectors. The level of GMP compliance required for the manufacture of LV is dependent upon their intended use, stage of drug product development, and country where the vector will be used as the different regulatory authorities who oversee the clinical usage of such products may have different requirements. As such, successful GMP manufacture of LV requires a combination of diverse factors including: regulatory expertise, compliant facilities, validated and calibrated equipments, starting materials of the highest quality, trained production personnel, scientifically robust production processes, and a quality by design approach. More importantly, oversight throughout manufacturing by an independent Quality Assurance Unit who has the authority to reject or approve the materials is required. We describe here the GMP manufacture of LV at our facility using a four plasmid system where 293T cells from an approved Master Cell Bank (MCB) are transiently transfected using polyethylenimine (PEI). Following transfection, the media is changed and Benzonase added to digest residual plasmid DNA. Two harvests of crude supernatant are collected and then clarified by filtration. The clarified supernatant is purified and concentrated by anion exchange chromatography and tangential flow filtration. The final product is then diafiltered directly into the sponsor defined final formulation buffer and aseptically filled.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , Genetic Therapy , Genetic Vectors/biosynthesis , Genetic Vectors/standards , Lentivirus , Cell Culture Techniques , Culture Media , Facility Design and Construction , Genetic Therapy/standards , Genetic Vectors/genetics , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Lentivirus/genetics , Transfection
2.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 42(6): 247-53, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27344685

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2008 Premier (Premier, Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina) began its Quality, Efficiency, and Safety with Transparency (QUEST®) collaborative, which is an acute health care organization program focused on improving quality and reducing patient harm. METHODS: Retrospective performance data for QUEST hospitals were used to establish trends from the third quarter (Q3; July­September) of 2006 through Q3 2015. The study population included past and present members of the QUEST collaborative (N = 356), with each participating hospital considered a member. The QUEST program engages with member hospitals through a routine-coaching structure, sprints, minicollaboratives, and face-to-face meetings. RESULTS: Cost and efficiency data showed reductions in adjusted cost per discharge for hospitals between Q3 2013 (mean, $8,296; median, $8,459) and Q3 2015 (mean, $8,217; median, $7,895). Evidence-based care (EBC) measures showed improvement from baseline (Q3 2006; mean, 77%; median, 79%) to Q3 2015 (mean, 95%; median, 96%). Observed-to-expected (O/E) mortality improved from 1% to 22% better-than-expected outcomes on average. The QUEST safety harm composite score showed moderate reduction from Q1 2009 to Q3 2015, as did the O/E readmission rates--from Q1 2010 to Q3 2015--with improvement from a 5% to an 8% better-than-expected score. CONCLUSION: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of QUEST collaborative hospitals indicated that for the 2006-2015 period, QUEST facilities reduced cost per discharge, improved adherence with evidence-based practice, reduced safety harm composite score, improved patient experience, and reduced unplanned readmissions.


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Patient Safety/economics , Patient Satisfaction , Program Evaluation , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...