Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefazolin using total and unbound serum concentrations in patients with high body weight.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefazolin in patients with a high body weight. Cefazolin was administered by 0.5-h infusions to 11 patients with total body weight (TBW) ≥120 kg receiving 3 g q8h, and 12 patients with TBW <120 kg receiving 2 g q8h. Total and unbound serum concentration-time data obtained from serial blood samples were analysed simultaneously by population pharmacokinetic modelling using NONMEM. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated for various dosing regimens through Monte Carlo simulations based on the cumulative percentage of the dosing interval that the unbound concentration exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value for the pathogen at steady state (fTMIC) ≥40%, ≥60% and 100%. A two-compartment model with non-linear protein binding and allometric scaling of the central volume of distribution using TBW best characterized both total and unbound concentration-time data. Unbound clearance was significantly associated with creatinine clearance, and maximum protein binding constant was significantly associated with serum albumin concentration and body mass index (P <0.05). Based on unbound concentration-time profiles, all simulated regimens achieved PTA >90% at MIC values ≤2 mg/L using fTMIC ≥40%, at MIC values ≤1 mg/L using fTMIC ≥60%, and at MIC values ≤0.5 mg/L using fTMIC of 100%. At fTMIC ≥60%, 0.5-h infusion of cefazolin 1 g q8h achieved PTA <90% at MIC values ≥2 mg/L in patients with TBW≥120 kg; however, prolonged-infusion and higher-dose regimens improved PTA to >90%. Overall, cefazolin pharmacokinetics are altered considerably in obese patients. Higher-dose and/or prolonged-infusion cefazolin regimens should be considered in patients with TBW ≥120 kg, particularly those with less-susceptible Gram-negative infections.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Doripenem in Obese, Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Doripenem population pharmacokinetics and dosing recommendations are limited in obesity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doripenem in obese patients. METHODS: Hospitalized adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2 or total body weight (TBW) ≥45.5 kg over their ideal body weight received doripenem 500 mg every 8 hours, infused over 1 hour. Population pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using NONMEM, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed for 5 intermittent and prolonged infusion dosing regimens to calculate probability of target attainment (PTA) at 40% and 100% fT>MIC (free drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration). RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were studied: 10 in an intensive care unit (ICU) and 10 in a non-ICU. A 2-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the serum concentration-time data. Doripenem clearance (CL) was significantly associated with creatinine CL (CRCL), volume of the central compartment with TBW and ICU residence, and volume of the peripheral compartment with TBW ( P < 0.05). Using 40% fT>MIC, PTA was >90% for all simulated dosing regimens at MICs ≤2 mg/L. Using 100% fT>MIC, prolonged infusions of 1 g every 6 hours and 2 g every 8 hours achieved >90% PTA at MICs ≤2 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: CRCL, ICU residence, and TBW are significantly associated with doripenem pharmacokinetics. Currently approved dosing regimens provide adequate pharmacodynamic exposures at 40% fT>MIC for susceptible bacteria in obese patients. However, prolonged infusions of larger doses are needed if a higher pharmacodynamic target is desired.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Meropenem in Nonobese, Obese, and Morbidly Obese Patients.

The study objective was to evaluate meropenem population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in nonobese, obese, and morbidly obese patients. Forty adult patients-11 nonobese (body mass index [BMI] < 30 kg/m2 ), 9 obese (30 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 40 kg/m2 ), and 20 morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 )-received meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours (q6h), q8h, or q12h or 1 g q6h or q8h, infused over 0.5 hour. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using NONMEM, and 5000-patient Monte-Carlo simulations were performed to calculate probability of target attainment (PTA) for 5 dosing regimens, infused over 0.5 and 3 hours, using fT>MIC of 40%, 54%, and 100% of the dosing interval. A 2-compartment linear-elimination model best described the serum concentration-time data, and creatinine clearance was significantly associated with systemic clearance. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different among patient groups. In patients with creatinine clearances ≥50 mL/min, all simulated dosing regimens achieved >90% PTA at 40% fT>MIC in all patient groups at MICs ≤2 mg/L. Only 500 mg q8h, infused over 0.5 hour, did not achieve >90% PTA at 54% fT>MIC in nonobese and morbidly obese patients. At 100% fT>MIC, 1 g q6h and 2 g q8h, infused over 3 hours, reliably achieved >90% PTA in all patient groups. Meropenem pharmacokinetics are comparable among nonobese, obese, and morbidly obese patients. Standard dosing regimens provide adequate pharmacodynamic exposures for susceptible pathogens at 40% and 54% fT>MIC, but prolonged infusions of larger doses are needed for adequate exposures at 100% fT>MIC. Dosage adjustments based solely on body weight are unnecessary.

Use of Monte Carlo Simulations to Determine Optimal Carbapenem Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Prolonged Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses with Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) can be used to integrate prior information on model parameters into a new renal replacement therapy (RRT) to develop optimal drug dosing when pharmacokinetic trials are not feasible. This study used MCSs to determine initial doripenem, imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem dosing regimens for critically ill patients receiving prolonged intermittent RRT (PIRRT). Published body weights and pharmacokinetic parameter estimates (nonrenal clearance, free fraction, volume of distribution, extraction coefficients) with variability were used to develop a pharmacokinetic model. MCS of 5000 patients evaluated multiple regimens in 4 different PIRRT effluent/duration combinations (4 L/h × 10 hours or 5 L/h × 8 hours in hemodialysis or hemofiltration) occurring at the beginning or 14-16 hours after drug infusion. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated using ≥40% free serum concentrations above 4 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the first 48 hours. Optimal doses were defined as the smallest daily dose achieving ≥90% PTA in all PIRRT combinations. At the MIC of 2 mg/L for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, optimal doses were doripenem 750 mg every 8 hours, imipenem 1 g every 8 hours or 750 mg every 6 hours, and meropenem 1 g every 12 hours or 1 g pre- and post-PIRRT. Ertapenem 500 mg followed by 500 mg post-PIRRT was optimal at the MIC of 1 mg/L for Streptococcus pneumoniae. Incorporating data from critically ill patients receiving RRT into MCS resulted in markedly different carbapenem dosing regimens in PIRRT from those recommended for conventional RRTs because of the unique drug clearance characteristics of PIRRT. These results warrant clinical validation.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Extended-Infusion Piperacillin and Tazobactam in Critically Ill Children.

The study objective was to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of extended-infusion piperacillin-tazobactam in children hospitalized in an intensive care unit. Seventy-two serum samples were collected at steady state from 12 patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam at 100/12.5 mg/kg of body weight every 8 h infused over 4 h. Population pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using NONMEM, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the piperacillin pharmacokinetic profiles for dosing regimens of 80 to 100 mg/kg of the piperacillin component given every 6 to 8 h and infused over 0.5, 3, or 4 h. The probability of target attainment (PTA) for a cumulative percentage of the dosing interval that the drug concentration exceeds the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions (TMIC) of ≥50% was calculated at MICs ranging from 0.25 to 64 mg/liter. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age, weight, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were 5 ± 3 years, 17 ± 6.2 kg, and 118 ± 41 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. A one-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination best fit the pharmacokinetic data for both drugs. Weight was significantly associated with piperacillin clearance, and weight and sex were significantly associated with tazobactam clearance. Pharmacokinetic parameters (mean ± SD) for piperacillin and tazobactam were as follows: clearance, 0.22 ± 0.07 and 0.19 ± 0.07 liter/h/kg, respectively; volume of distribution, 0.43 ± 0.16 and 0.37 ± 0.14 liter/kg, respectively. All extended-infusion regimens achieved PTAs of >90% at MICs of ≤16 mg/liter. Only the 3-h infusion regimens given every 6 h achieved PTAs of >90% at an MIC of 32 mg/liter. For susceptible bacterial pathogens, piperacillin-tazobactam doses of ≥80/10 mg/kg given every 8 h and infused over 4 h achieve adequate pharmacodynamic exposures in critically ill children.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin and tazobactam administered by prolonged infusion in obese and nonobese patients.

The study objective was to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin and tazobactam administered by prolonged infusion in obese and nonobese patients. Twenty-seven patients (total body weight [TBW], 60 to 211 kg; body mass index [BMI], 19.6 to 72.9 kg/m(2) ) received 4.5 or 6.75 g every 8 hours, infused over 4 hours, and serum concentrations were measured at steady state. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using NONMEM, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed for three 4-hour dosing regimens to calculate probability of target attainment (PTA) at ≥50% fT>MIC.A 1-compartment linear-elimination model best fit the pharmacokinetic data for piperacillin and tazobactam. Creatinine clearance (CRCL), TBW, and BMI were significantly associated with piperacillin pharmacokinetics, and CRCL was significantly associated with tazobactam pharmacokinetics. Clearance and volume of distribution for piperacillin and tazobactam were significantly different between obese and nonobese patients (P < .05). At MICs ≤ 16 mg/L, PTA was >90% for dosing regimens ≥3.375 g every 8 hours in nonobese patients and ≥ 4.5 g every 8 hours in obese patients. Piperacillin and tazobactam pharmacokinetics are altered in obesity, and 4.5 g every 8 hours infused over 4 hours should be recommended for empiric therapy in obese patients.

Implementing extended-infusion cefepime as standard of care in a children's hospital: a prospective descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Extended-infusion cefepime (EIC) has been associated with decreased mortality in adults, but to our knowledge, there are no studies in children. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of implementing EIC as the standard dosing strategy in a pediatric population. METHODS: This was a descriptive study of children aged 1 month to 17 years, including patients in the intensive care unit, who received cefepime after admission to a freestanding, tertiary care children's hospital. Patients were excluded if they were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit or received cefepime in the outpatient, operating, or emergency department areas. Demographic and clinical data for patients who received cefepime from April through August 2013, the period following EIC implementation, were extracted from the medical records. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included in the study, with a median age (interquartile range [IQR]) of 6 years (2-12.3 years) and median weight (IQR) of 20.7 kg (13.2-42.8 kg); 143 patients received cefepime via extended infusions, and 10 (7.0%) of those were changed to a 30-minute infusion during treatment. The most common reasons for infusion time change were intravenous (IV) incompatibility and IV access concerns, responsible for 50% of changes. Dosing errors and reported incidents during therapy were sparse (n = 12, 8.0%) and were most commonly related to renal dosing errors and/or initial dose error by prescriber. CONCLUSIONS: Because 93.0% of the patients who initially received EIC remained on EIC, implementation of EIC as the standard dosing strategy was feasible in this pediatric hospital.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem in morbidly obese patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit.

The study objective was to evaluate meropenem pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in morbid obesity. Nine patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m(2) received meropenem 500 mg or 1 g q6h, infused over 0.5 hours. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed for 5 dosing regimens (500 mg q8h, 1 g q8h, 2 g q8h, 500 mg q6h, 1 g q6h) infused over 0.5 and 3 hours. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated using fT > MIC of 40% and 54%. Total body weight and body mass index were 152.3 ± 31.0 kg and 54.7 ± 8.6 kg/m(2) , respectively. Volume of distribution of the central compartment was 13.3 ± 6.7 L, volume of distribution at steady-state was 37.4 ± 14.7 L, and systemic clearance was 10.2 ± 5.0 L/h. At an MIC of 2 µg/mL, PTA was ≥90% for 4/5 and 2/5 regimens infused over 0.5 hours and for 5/5 and 4/5 regimens infused over 3 hours at 40% and 54% fT > MIC, respectively. Standard doses achieve adequate exposures for susceptible bacteria at a pharmacodynamic target of 40% fT > MIC. Higher doses or prolonged infusion regimens are needed at the higher pharmacodynamic target.

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doripenem and meropenem in obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are limited in obesity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doripenem and meropenem in obese patients hospitalized on a general ward. METHODS: Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m² or total body weight (TBW) ≥100 pounds over their ideal body weight randomly received doripenem 500 mg (1-hour infusion) or meropenem 1 g (0.5-hour infusion) every 8 hours. Differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by unpaired t test. Monte Carlo simulations were performed for 500 mg and 1 g every 8 hours, infused over 1 and 4 hours for doripenem and 0.5 and 3 hours for meropenem. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated using a pharmacodynamic target of 40% fT > MIC (free drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]), and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated using MIC data for 8 Gram-negative pathogens. RESULTS: Twenty patients were studied. Volume of distribution at steady state, corrected for TBW, was significantly larger (0.18 ± 0.04 vs 0.13 ± 0.05 L/kg, P = .048) and systemic clearance was significantly faster for doripenem (11.7 ± 4.1 vs 8.1 ± 2.6 L/h, P = .03). PTA was >90% for all regimens at MICs ≤2 µg/mL. CFR was >90% for all regimens against 6 enteric Gram-negative pathogens and for 3 of 4 regimens for each drug against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: Doripenem and meropenem pharmacokinetics differ in obesity. However, currently approved dosing regimens provide adequate pharmacodynamic exposures for susceptible bacteria in obese patients.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin and tazobactam administered by prolonged infusion in obese patients.

The study objective was to evaluate steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin and tazobactam administered by prolonged infusion in obese patients. Fourteen hospitalised patients weighing >120kg received piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g every 8 h (q8h) or 6.75 g q8h infused over 4h. Blood samples were collected at steady-state and drug concentrations were determined. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated and 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulations were performed for four prolonged-infusion dosing regimens. The probability of target attainment (PTA) for ≥50% fT>MIC was calculated for piperacillin at various MICs, and the PTA for fAUC(0-24)≥96 mg h/L was calculated for tazobactam. Mean±S.D. patient demographics were: age 49±10 years; weight 161±29 kg; and body mass index 52.3±10.8 kg/m(2). For piperacillin and tazobactam, respectively, the mean±S.D. elimination rate was 0.440±0.177 h(-1) and 0.320±0.145 h(-1), volume of distribution was 33.4±14.0L (0.21±0.07L/kg) and 37.5±15.3L (0.23±0.08 L/kg), and systemic clearance was 13.7±5.2L/h and 11.1±4.2L/h. For piperacillin, the PTA was ≥91% for doses ≥4.5g q8h at MICs≤16 µg/mL. For tazobactam, the PTA was 57%, 84% and 94% for doses of 4.5, 6.75 and 9.0g q8h, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam are altered in obese patients. To ensure adequate tazobactam concentrations for ß-lactamase inhibition, it may be prudent to employ larger initial doses for empirical therapy in obese patients.

System-wide implementation of the use of an extended-infusion piperacillin/tazobactam dosing strategy: feasibility of utilization from a children's hospital perspective.

BACKGROUND: Use of extended infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam (PT) in adult patients has been described, but data in children are limited. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the feasibility of using an extended-infusion PT dosing strategy as the standard of care in a children's hospital. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of patients aged >30 days who received PT after admission to a freestanding, tertiary care children's hospital. After institution of an extended-infusion PT dosing protocol as the standard dosing option, patients receiving PT were prospectively assessed for presence of and reasons for changes in dosing regimen. RESULTS: A total of 332 patients, with a median age of 5 years (interquartile range, 1.9-12 years) and median weight of 19.9 kg (interquartile range, 11.7 - 37.6 kg) received PT (100 mg/kg based on piperacillin component). Extended-infusion PT was used for the duration of PT therapy in 92% (n = 304) of patients. Twenty-eight patients (8%) received a traditional infusion over 30 minutes, with 19 of 28 being changed from extended infusion and 9 of 28 being empirically prescribed traditional infusion PT. The most commonly encountered reason for not using extended infusions was coadministration of vancomycin (17 of 28 [61%]) and lack of compatibility data with PT. Dosing errors, which were voluntarily reported, were infrequent (1.8% [n = 6]). The few observed dosing errors were likely attributable to the overall ordering process at our institution, which requires ordering as the milligram per kilogram dose as total PT rather than based on piperacillin component as is commonly documented in pediatric dosing references. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that extended-infusion PT dosing was feasible in this specific children's hospital. Ninety-two percent of patients received our institution's preferred dosing regimen; a small percentage of patients still needed to receive traditional infusion times.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of intravenous levetiracetam in neurocritical care patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To characterize the steady-state pharmacokinetics of intravenous levetiracetam in neurocritical care patients requiring seizure prophylaxis after a neurologic injury and to determine which dosing regimens achieve serum concentrations within the recommended therapeutic range of 6-20 µg/ml. DESIGN. Prospective, open-label, steady-state pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: Neurocritical care unit in a tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS. Twelve adults (five men, seven women) admitted to the neurocritical care unit who required prophylactic anticonvulsant therapy after subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, or traumatic brain injury. INTERVENTION: Patients received an intravenous infusion of levetiracetam 500 mg over 15 minutes every 12 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serial blood samples were collected from all patients after a minimum of four doses of therapy. Serum levetiracetam concentrations were determined by ultraperformance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection, and pharmacokinetic data were analyzed by compartmental and noncompartmental methods. Monte Carlo simulations were performed for multiple levetiracetam dosing regimens to determine the probability of achieving a target trough concentration of 6 µg/ml or greater, 20 µg/ml or greater, and 6-20 µg/ml. The mean ± SD levetiracetam maximum serum concentration was 28.0 ± 8.0 µg/ml, minimum serum concentration 3.1 ± 1.8 µg/ml, half-life 5.2 ± 1.2 hours, systemic clearance 5.6 ± 1.8 L/hour, and volume of distribution at steady state 36.8 ± 6.3 L. Increasing the doses of levetiracetam increased the probability of achieving a target trough concentration of 6 µg/ml or greater but also increased the probability of achieving trough concentrations greater than 20 µg/ml. Levetiracetam doses of 1000 mg every 8 hours and 1500-2000 mg every 12 hours provided the highest probability of achieving a target trough concentration between 6 and 20 µg/ml. CONCLUSION: Compared with previously published results in healthy volunteers and adults in status epilepticus, levetiracetam systemic clearance was faster and the terminal elimination half-life was shorter in neurocritical care patients. Higher doses or more frequent dosing may be needed to achieve target trough concentrations of 6-20 µg/ml.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefepime administered by prolonged infusion in hospitalised patients.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefepime administered by prolonged infusion in hospitalised patients requiring antimicrobial therapy. Nine patients received 1g every 8h (q8h), infused over 4h, and steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by non-compartmental and compartmental methods. Using these pharmacokinetic parameters, 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the pharmacokinetic profiles for six prolonged-infusion dosing regimens. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated at minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 0.06 µg/mL to 32 µg/mL, and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated for six Gram-negative pathogens using MIC data from the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) (2005-2007, USA). The pharmacodynamic target was free cefepime concentrations remaining above the MIC for 60% of the dosing interval (60% fT>MIC). Mean ± standard deviation maximum and minimum serum concentrations, terminal elimination half-life, elimination rate constant, volume of distribution and systemic clearance of cefepime were 32.5 ± 13.5 µg/mL, 9.5 ± 5.2 µg/mL, 2.4 ± 0.7h, 0.316 ± 0.116 h(-1), 21.3 ± 6.5L and 6.6 ± 3.6L/h, respectively. At the susceptibility breakpoint of 8 µg/mL, the PTA was >90% for 1g and 2g q8h (4-h infusion) and 1g and 2g every 6h (q6h) (3-h infusion). For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the CFR was 88.6% for 1g q8h (4-h infusion) and ≥ 92.7% for 2g q8h (4-h infusion) and 1g and 2g q6h (3-h infusion). Cefepime 1g q8h infused over 4h provides excellent target attainment for susceptible bacterial pathogens with MICs ≤8 µg/mL.

Vancomycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during short daily hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Short daily hemodialysis (SDHD) is an alternative to thrice-weekly HD because of its putative physiologic benefits. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of SDHD on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vancomycin. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Six noninfected adults who had anuria and were treated with SDHD were studied and received four dialysis sessions over 4 days. After completion of the first SDHD, each patient received vancomycin 15 mg/kg by intravenous infusion. Blood samples were collected over the ensuing 3 days during each subsequent inter- and intradialytic period. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. Serum concentration-time profiles were simulated for four vancomycin regimens with maintenance doses administered after every other SDHD. Area under the serum-concentration time curve (AUC) from 0 to 48 hours, 48 to 96 hours, and 96 to 144 hours were calculated, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine the probability of target attainment at an AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio ≥800 for each 48-hour AUC at MICs ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 µg/ml. RESULTS: Median (range) systemic clearance was 7.2 ml/min (5.3 to 10.0 ml/min), and dialytic clearance was 104 ml/min (94 to 106 ml/min). The steady-state volume of distribution was 55.4 L (34.8 to 77.2 L). At MICs ≤1 µg/ml, probability of target attainment was >90% for each 48-hour AUC when vancomycin was administered as a 20-mg/kg loading dose followed by 10 mg/kg after every other SDHD. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters in SDHD are consistent with data from thrice-weekly HD. A loading dose of 20 mg/kg followed by 10 mg/kg after every other SDHD provides adequate exposure for pathogens with MICs ≤1 µg/ml.

Comparative pharmacodynamics of intermittent and prolonged infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam using Monte Carlo simulations and steady-state pharmacokinetic data from hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Prolonging the infusion of a beta-lactam antibiotic enhances the time in which unbound drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC). OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacodynamics of several dosing regimens of piperacillin/tazobactam administered by intermittent and prolonged infusion using pharmacokinetic data from hospitalized patients. METHODS: Steady-state pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 13 patients who received piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g every 8 hours, infused over 4 hours. Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 pts.) were performed to calculate pharmacodynamic exposures at 50% fT>MIC for 4 intermittent-infusion regimens (3.375 g every 4 and 6 h, 4.5 g every 6 and 8 h) and 4 prolonged-infusion regimens (2.25 g, 3.375 g, 4.5 g, and 6.75 g every 8 h [4-h infusion]) of piperacillin/tazobactam using pharmacokinetic data for piperacillin. Cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated using MIC data for 6 gram-negative pathogens (Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection, 2004-2007), and probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated at MICs ranging from 1 microg/mL to 64 microg/mL. RESULTS: The CFR for 3.375 g every 4 hours (intermittent infusion) and 3.375-4.5 g every 8 hours (prolonged infusion) greater than or equal to 90.3% for Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens, and Citrobacter spp. Increasing the prolonged-infusion dose to 6.75 g improved the CFR to greater than 90% for Enterobacter spp. For every regimen evaluated, the CFR was less than 90% for Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. At an MIC of 16 microg/mL, PTA was greater than 90% for one intermittent-infusion regimen (3.375 g every 4 h) and 3 prolonged-infusion regimens (> or = 3.375 g every 8 h), but no regimen achieved a PTA greater than 90% at an MIC of 64 microg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: At doses greater than or equal to 3.375 g every 8 hours, 4-hour infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam achieved excellent target attainment with lower daily doses compared with standard regimens at MICs less than or equal to 16 microg/mL.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam administered by prolonged infusion in hospitalised patients.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam, administered by prolonged infusion, in hospitalised patients requiring antimicrobial therapy. Thirteen patients received 4.5 g every 8 h (q8h), infused over 4 h, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by non-compartmental methods. Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 patients) were performed to calculate the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for seven gram-negative pathogens using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data from the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (2004-2007, USA) as well as the probability of target attainment (PTA) at MICs ranging from 1 microg/mL to 64 microg/mL. The pharmacodynamic target was free piperacillin concentration remaining above the MIC for 50% of the dosing interval. Mean+/-standard deviation maximum and minimum serum concentrations, half-life, volume of distribution at steady-state and systemic clearance of piperacillin were 108.2+/-31.7 microg/mL, 27.6+/-26.3 microg/mL, 2.1+/-1.2 h, 22.1+/-4.0 L and 8.6+/-3.0 L/h, respectively. The CFR was > 90% for Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens and Citrobacter spp., 88.6% for Enterobacter spp., 87% for Klebsiella pneumoniae, 85.5% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 52.8% for Acinetobacter spp. The PTA was 100%, 81.1% and 12.3% at MICs of < or = 16 microg/mL, 32 microg/mL and 64 microg/mL, respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g q8h infused over 4 h provides excellent target attainment for bacterial pathogens with MICs < or = 16 microg/mL. However, the CFR was < 90% for four of the seven gram-negative pathogens evaluated.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem in hospitalized patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem 500 mg every 6, 8, and 12 hours, based on renal function, in hospitalized patients. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, steady-state pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: One tertiary care medical center and one community hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty adult patients (12 men, 8 women) with suspected or documented bacterial infections requiring antimicrobial therapy. INTERVENTION: Patients received 30-minute infusions of meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours (group 1), every 8 hours (group 2), or every 12 hours (group 3) based on estimated creatinine clearances greater than 60, 40-60, or 10-39 ml/minute, respectively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serial blood samples were collected after 2 or more days of therapy. Meropenem concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and pharmacokinetic data were analyzed by noncompartmental methods. Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 patients) were performed to calculate the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for a percentage of the dosing interval that free drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) of 40% by using pharmacokinetic data for each group and MIC data for seven gram-negative pathogens from the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC, 2004-2005) database. Maximum and minimum serum concentrations (mean +/- SD) were 29.2+/-9.8 and 2.4+/-1.1 microg/ml, 33.2+/-8.5 and 3.8+/-2.7 microg/ml, and 33.5+/-4.7 and 4.9+/-1.6 microg/ml for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The half-life values were 2.5+/-0.9, 3.4+/-1.3, and 6.1+/-1.4 hours, and the values for volume of distribution at steady state were 29.3+/-8.7, 23.8+/-8.1, and 28.7+/-8.6 L for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For all three groups, the CFR was greater than 90% for the enteric pathogens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 82.4-85.2% for Acinetobacter species. CONCLUSION: Pharmacodynamic analyses suggest that regimens of meropenem 500 mg every 6, 8, or 12 hours, adjusted for renal function, are acceptable for treatment of infections caused by enteric gram-negative pathogens and P. aeruginosa. However, more aggressive dosing or alternative dosing strategies may be necessary for Acinetobacter species.

Comparative in vitro and bactericidal activities of telithromycin against penicillin-nonsusceptible, levofloxacin-resistant, and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae by time-kill methodology.

Broth microdilution MICs were determined for 14 antimicrobial agents against 296 clinical, non-duplicate isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae collected at Methodist Hospital (Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) from January 2001 to December 2003. Isolates were categorized as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Time-kill studies were performed to evaluate the bactericidal activity of telithromycin at 1, 2, 4, and 8x MIC against 10 penicillin-nonsusceptible, levofloxacin-resistant, and macrolide-resistant (7 M-phenotype, 3 MLS(B)-phenotype) strains. Bactericidal activity was defined as a >/=3-log(10) reduction in CFU/mL. The prevalence of resistance was highest for the macrolides (32%), followed by penicillin (16.2%), clindamycin (10.8%), amoxicillin+/-clavulanate (4.4%), levofloxacin (3.0%), gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin (2.4%), ceftriaxone and cefotaxime (2.0%), and gemifloxacin (1.4%). None of the isolates tested were resistant to telithromycin. At 24h, telithromycin was bactericidal for 0/10, 2/10, 7/10, and 7/10 isolates at 1x MIC, 2x MIC, 4x MIC, and 8x MIC, respectively. At 4-8x MIC, telithromycin was bactericidal for 7/7 M-phenotype isolates and 0/3 MLS(B)-phenotype isolates. For the MLS(B)-phenotype isolates, colony counts were decreased by 1.3-2.1log(10) colony-forming units/mL after 24h at 8x MIC. Overall, telithromycin was highly active against 296 isolates of S. pneumoniae from our institution and demonstrated bactericidal activity at clinically achievable concentrations for 7 of 10 penicillin-nonsusceptible, levofloxacin-resistant, and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. However, telithromycin was bacteriostatic for the MLS(B)-phenotype isolates.

Selection of a gyrA mutation and treatment failure with gatifloxacin in a patient with Streptococcus pneumoniae with a preexisting parC mutation.

An 81-year-old woman had pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (levofloxacin Etest minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] 1.5 microg/ml) and was treated with intravenous gatifloxacin 200 mg/day. After 3 days of therapy, repeat sputum cultures were positive for S. pneumoniae, which was resistant to levofloxacin (Etest MIC > 32 microg/ml). The isolate obtained before therapy showed a preexisting parC mutation of aspartic acid-83 to asparagine (Asp83-->Asn), and the isolate obtained during therapy showed an acquired gyrA mutation from serine-81 to phenylalanine (Ser81-->Phe) and a second parC mutation from lysine-137 to Asn (Lys137-->Asn). Both isolates were the same strain, as determined with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. This case demonstrates the potential for resistance to emerge during 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone therapy for fluoroquinolone-susceptible S. pneumoniae with a preexisting parC mutation. Additional clinical failures with a fluoroquinolone may occur unless these first-step parC mutants can be identified to assist clinicians in selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

Gatifloxacin pharmacokinetics in healthy men and women.

The sex-based pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin were investigated. Healthy subjects (6 men, 6 women) received a single oral dose of gatifloxacin 400 mg. Blood and urine samples were collected, and gatifloxacin concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by fitting appropriate models to the serum concentration-time data using ADAPT II. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the influence of sex and weight on the oral clearance (CL(s)/F) and apparent steady-state volume of distribution (V(ss)/F) of gatifloxacin. Women had a significantly smaller V(ss)/F compared to men (93.5 +/- 21.3 L vs 128.8 +/- 16.2 L, P = .009); however, there was no significant difference when normalized for total body weight (TBW) or lean body weight (LBW). Neither CL(s)/F nor peak serum concentration (C(max)) was significantly different between sexes, although C(max) was 25% higher in women (P = .06). Regression analyses revealed that TBW (R(2) = .63) and LBW (R(2) = .65) were strong predictors of V(ss)/F. Given the smaller V(ss)/F, women may have slightly higher maximum concentrations, but these differences are unlikely to have clinical significance.