Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Surg ; 224(6): 1426-1431, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36372580

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Borderline resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas involves the major vascular structures adjacent to the pancreas and has traditionally led to poor resection rates and survival. Newer chemotherapy regimens have demonstrated improved response and resection rates. We performed a retrospective review of borderline resectable pancreatic cancers who presented to a community cancer program to determine the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve resection rates and overall survival. METHODS: Records of all patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019 were reviewed to determine stage at presentation, resectablility status, treatment methods, surgical resection and survival. Borderline resectable status was determined by preoperative imaging in agreement with published criteria from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines 2.2021. Data was collected and analyzed by standard t-test. This study was approved by the institution's IRB. RESULTS: During this time period 322 patients were diagnosed with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas of which 151 (47%) were unresectable, 31 (10%) were locally advanced, 70 (22%) were borderline resectable, and 69 (21%) were resectable at the time of presentation. 36 (51%) of the borderline resectable patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our institution with either FOLFIRINOX or gemcitibine/nab-Paclitaxel regimens and served as the basis for this analysis. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy 24 (68%) of the borderline-resectable patients were deemed suitable for surgical exploration. At exploration, 15 (64%) were resected with 9 (60%) achieving margin-free resection on final pathology. The overall survival of those that underwent resection was increased by 19.6 months compared to those that did not undergo surgery (35.4 versus 15.8 mos, p < 0.01). Overall morbidity after resection was 46% (33% class 1 or 2, 13% class 3) with 0% mortality at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas results in improved resection rates and overall survival in resected patients. This management strategy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is safe and feasible in a community-based cancer program.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Pancreas/pathology
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 145(2): 412e-420e, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31985659

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The muscle-sparing descending branch latissimus dorsi muscle (MSLD) flap is a versatile flap with numerous benefits. It is an often overlooked but useful option when considering free flap donors. In this article, the authors present the largest experience with the MSLD flap, with focus on its use in lower extremity reconstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing lower extremity reconstruction with the MSLD flap at a single institution from 2012 to 2017 were identified. Patient and wound characteristics, surgical details, complications, and outcomes were examined. Outcomes were compared to a cohort who underwent lower extremity reconstruction with other free muscle flaps during the same period. RESULTS: Thirty-six consecutive patients who underwent MSLD flap surgery were identified. Mean follow-up was 18.8 months. Mean body mass index was 29.2 kg/m and 56 percent were smokers. The most common wound causes were motor vehicle collision (46 percent) and fall (22 percent). The most common anatomical location was the distal third of the tibia (33 percent). Mean operative time was 380 minutes. Complications included three total losses (8 percent) and one partial loss (3 percent). No donor-site seromas were reported. Four patients required subsequent amputation for orthopedic issues (nonunion/pain). Patients receiving MSLD and other flaps had similar rates of amputation, donor- and recipient-site complications, and ambulation status (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The MSLD flap is a useful and reliable option for free flap reconstruction of the lower extremity. Advantages include an easily contourable flap, low revision rate, low complication rate, and the ability to harvest in supine position. In addition, the MSLD flap preserves donor function useful for rehabilitation and minimizes seroma risk. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.


Subject(s)
Lower Extremity , Muscle, Skeletal/transplantation , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Surgical Flaps/blood supply , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Lower Extremity/injuries , Lower Extremity/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/blood supply , Skin Transplantation/methods , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...