ABSTRACT
Statement of the Problem: The prevalence of non-carious dentin lesions is on the rise mainly due to improved life expectancy. Successful management of these lesions is often challenging, and given that dentin can be remineralized, adverse consequences due to progression of these lesions can be prevented or minimized as such. Purpose: This study aimed to assess the effect of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) and Remin-Pro remineralizing agents on dentin microhardness of non-carious dentin lesions. Materials and Method: This in vitro, experimental study evaluated 36 extracted sound human premolars. The teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction. Enamel was removed, and dentin was exposed at the cervical third of the buccal surface. The primary microhardness of dentin was then measured. The teeth, standardized in terms of dentin microhardness, then underwent demineralization by acid etching and were subjected to microhardness test again. They were then randomized into three groups for treatment with CPP-ACP, Remin-Pro, and artificial saliva (control), and dentin microhardness was measured for the third time after treatment. Data were analyzed using ANOVA. Results: Within group comparisons showed a significant difference in microhardness at the three time points in all three groups (p< 0.005). Between-group comparisons revealed that the microhardness of the three groups was not significantly different at baseline or after demineralization. However, the microhardness of the three groups was significantly different after the intervention (p= 0.000). Pairwise comparisons revealed significantly higher microhardness in the CPP-ACP group than the other two groups (p= 0.003). Remin-Pro and the control groups were not significantly different in this respect (p= 0.340). Conclusion: CPP-ACP can be used for remineralization of non-caries dentin lesions; however, Remin-Pro does not appear to be effective for this purpose.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Repair bond strength of different composite resins has been assessed in few studies. In addition, reports on the efficacy of surface treatments are debated. Therefore, this in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the effect of three surface treatments on two nanocomposites versus a microhybrid composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, 135 composite blocks (45 specimens per composite) of microhybrid (Filtek Supreme Z250, 3M ESPE, USA), nanohybrid (Filtek Supreme XT, 3M ESPE), and nanofilled (Filtek Supreme Z350, 3M ESPE) were thermocycled (5000 rounds) and then surface roughened (except in a control group of 9 specimens of three composite types). Each composite type was divided into three subgroups of surface treatments: (1) Bur abrading and phosphoric acid (PA) etching, (2) sandblasting and PA etching, and (3) hydrofluoric etching and silane application (n = 15 × 9, complying with ISO TR11405). Composite blocks were repaired with the same composite type but of a different color. Microtensile bond strength and modes of failure were analyzed statistically using two-way analyses of variance, Tukey and Chi-square tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: There were significant differences between three composite resins (P < 0.0001) and treatment techniques (P < 0.0001). Their interaction was nonsignificant (P = 0.228). The difference between nanofilled and nanohybrid was not significant. However, the microhybrid composite showed a significantly higher bond strength (Tukey P < 0.05). Sandblasting was significantly superior to the other two methods, which were not different from each other. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it seems that microhybrid composite might have higher repair strengths than two evaluated nanocomposites. Among the assessed preparation techniques, sandblasting followed by PA etching might produce the highest bond strength.
ABSTRACT
One of the most challenging issues following restoration is microleakage. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser with and without acid etching on microleakage of class V composite restorations. A total of 68 human intact premolars were selected, disinfected, and randomly allocated to four experimental groups (n = 16) as well as positive and negative controls (n = 2 each). Dimensionally, similar class V cavities were prepared on buccal surface of each tooth under the following conditions: group 1, bur cavity preparation and chemical etching (BE); group 2, bur cavity preparation and Er,Cr:YSGG laser conditioning (BLc); group 3, Er,Cr:YSGG laser cavity preparation and chemical etching (LE); and group 4, Er,Cr:YSGG laser cavity preparation and Er,Cr:YSGG laser conditioning (LLc). All samples were restored with composite. The teeth were sealed and immersed in 1 % methylene blue for 48 h before being sectioned. The microleakage evaluation was done under a stereomicroscope (×20). The leakage scores were recorded and Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical evaluations. The highest microleakage score was seen in gingival margins of group 4 (LLc) and the lowest in occlusal margins of group 3 (LE). The overall difference in leakage scores among the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001) with gingival margins showing a significantly higher score than its occlusal counterparts (p < 0.001). It was noted that less microleakage could be achieved when cavities were prepared by laser compared to bur. In addition, less microleakage was seen in acid-etched cavities than laser-conditioned counterparts.
