Revascularization Techniques for Limb Salvage in Critical Limb Ischemia: A Single Institutional Study From Pakistan.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to determine the frequency of successful limb salvage in patients presenting with critical limb ischemia utilizing the available revascularization modalities. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from April 2017 to August 2017. METHODOLOGY: A total of 96 patients with critical limb ischemia requiring urgent surgery for limb salvage were included in our study. Patients who had undergone previous surgeries for limb ischemia involving the same limb, had concurrent venous disease, or suffered from acute limb ischemia were excluded. All patients underwent either endoscopic angioplasty or bypass surgery. All patients were followed up for six months for the success of limb salvage and the requirement for amputation. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 26.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). RESULTS: Our patients had a mean age of 62.03±8.46 years, of whom 63 (65.6%) were men. A total of 47 (49.0%) patients required surgery for a non-healing ulcer, while 49 (51.0%) had resting leg pain. In 55 (57.3%) patients, bypass surgery was performed, while 35 (36.5%) underwent endoscopic angioplasty. The remaining six (6.2%) patients received a combination of both procedures. Limb salvage was successful in 78 (81.3%) patients. There was no difference between outcomes across gender (p=0.122), nor was there any difference in outcome between bypass surgery and endoscopic angioplasty (p=0.665). CONCLUSION: Encouraging results can be obtained in treatment of critical limb ischemia if revascularization techniques are utilized prudently in a time-effective manner and individualized to each patient's requirements.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Are Benefits Demonstrated in International Studies Replicable in Pakistan?

Objectives To determine the efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in terms of frequency of surgical site infection (SSI) and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries for colorectal carcinoma. Study design Quasi-experimental study. Setting/Duration of study Department of Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from May 7, 2019 to November 6, 2019. Methodology A total of 120 patients with colorectal carcinomas who fulfilled that sample selection criteria were studied. After randomization, patients were divided into two equal groups; one group received management under ERAS while the second group received conventional management. All patients were recorded for length of hospital stay and the development of SSIs. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Results The mean age was 42.34 ± 14.45 years, with a male majority, i.e., 72 (60%). The mean duration of in-patient stay was 3.45 ± 1.73 days with ERAS and 8.25 ± 1.58 days with conventional management (p < 0.001). A total of 28 (23.3%) SSIs developed, of which nine (7.5%) SSIs occurred with ERAS, while 19 (15.8%) occurred with traditional management (p = 0.031). Conclusion ERAS protocols have been demonstrated to be effective, cheap, and safe. There is a tangible reduction in length of hospital stay and incidence of SSIs which translates into reduced utilization of resources and financial costs. However, strict adherence to the protocol may be necessary to obtain the aforementioned benefits, which may be difficult to do in the face of professional, institutional, and personal inertia. Intensive efforts are required to make these protocols more convenient and attractive to implement, so as to facilitate conversion to this management approach.

Carotid Endarterectomy: A Single Institutional Experience of 28 Years From Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular event is the most common reason of acute neurological injury in the western world. There is an extensive literature and data available on its prognosis, outcomes and complications rates from the west, yet still, data regarding its safety and efficacy is scarce from the South Asian belt. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the role of carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid stenosis regarding prevention of stroke and safety of the procedure. METHODS: A descriptive case series of 335 consecutive patients from January 1990 till July 2018. All patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy were included. Patient having asymptomatic carotid disease (≥90%), history of a transient ischemic attack or patients with a recent or previous episode of ischemic stroke (≥60%) were selected for the procedure. All procedures were performed under GA. Post operatively patients were kept on antiplatelet therapy and followed on outpatient basis for any complications using carotid duplex scans. Data regarding 30-day postoperative parameters of the procedure were collected and evaluated. P< 0.05 is considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 335 carotid endarterectomies were performed. The majority of patients in our series were males 68.90% (n = 230) compared to 31.10% (n = 105) females (P< 0.05). There were no intraoperative mortalities in our patients. The 15-day perioperative mortality was 1.5% (n = 5), out of which 3 patients had concomitant CABG and died of cardiac complications. The mortality rate of CEA alone was 0.6% (n = 2). Six patients (1.8%) developed focal neurological deficits in the postoperative period during the hospital stay. Three patients developed wound infection after surgery. Neck hematoma formation occurred in 11.7% (n = 39) patients and 7 required immediate decompression. A total of 321 patients remained stroke free at 6 months follow up. There was no increased risk of stroke secondary to bilateral carotid disease (OR 1.9 CI 0.35-10.7 P= 0.44). CONCLUSION: Carotid Endarterectomy is a relatively safe and effective procedure in our large series from Pakistan. It remains the standard for management of carotid stenosis in symptomatic as well as asymptomatic patients with critical stenosis.

Diagnostic, Surgical, and Postoperative Challenges of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Neck: Clinical Experience and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors of the neck are rare swellings, which constitute about 0.03% of all tumors. Most are sporadically arising paragangliomas. Over 50% arise from the carotid bodies and pose difficulties in diagnosis and surgical management, which may result in disabling complications. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic, surgical, and postoperative challenges, and how to overcome them, in the management of neuroendocrine tumors of the neck. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive case series. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 19 patients who presented to our surgery clinics between 2010 and 2015 with neck swelling and suspicion of neurogenic tumors were included in the study. All patients received preoperative evaluation with Doppler studies and neck computed tomography scan, with the finding of suspicion of neurogenic tumor. Preoperative tissue diagnosis was not attempted as this usually required excisional biopsy. All tumors were surgically excised. Data regarding mean tumor size, neurovascular invasion, postoperative complications, and histopathological findings were recorded and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (7 male) with median age of 45 years were included. Mean size of the tumor was 7.5 cm (range: 4.0-11.8 cm). Six of the tumors were right sided and 13 left sided. Clinical findings often were nonspecific and mimicked other conditions. Operative challenges were encountered in 11 (57.9%) patients, who had tumors of more than 5 cm. Vascular invasion was found in 2 (10.5%) patients, but bleeding requiring preoperative transfusion was not required in any patient. Neurological complications occurred in 11 (57.8%) patients; 3 had transit hypoglossal nerve palsy, with full recovery; 2 had complete nerve palsy, with reasonable rehabilitation without further surgical intervention; and 5 developed neurological deficits (hoarseness, dysphagia, or Horner's syndrome) but recovered and compensated well without further operation. Two patients who had vascular invasion required vascular reconstruction. Histopathology in 14 (73.7%) cases was carotid body tumor and 5 were Schwannomas (1 vagal and 4 sympathetic chain). All 4 patients with Schwannomas of cervical sympathetic chain developed Horner's syndrome; 2 of them have compensated well with reasonable recovery; 2 have had tarsorrhaphy for cosmetic reasons. The patient with vagal Schwannoma developed hoarseness and swallowing difficulties, which resolved without intervention. No malignancy was encountered in this series, and there was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroendocrine tumors of the neck present diagnostic challenges because of nonspecific clinical findings mimicking other conditions. Preoperative tissue diagnosis is mostly unsuccessful, and exact diagnosis requires excisional biopsy. Surgical excision, which is the main treatment, often has associated technical difficulties and unavoidable complications requiring further intervention.