Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 37(3): 272-6, 1989 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2918199

ABSTRACT

To improve the health care received by frail older persons, an effort has been made in the United States to increase the number of physicians trained in geriatric medicine and geropsychiatry. The goal of training has been to create leaders in education, research, and patient care. To assess the progress of this effort, we surveyed physicians (284 in geriatric medicine and 91 in geropsychiatry) who graduated from U.S. geriatrics fellowship programs. Responses were obtained from 224 medicine (79% response) and 59 psychiatry fellows (65% response). Sixty-five percent of former geriatric medicine fellows report spending 10% or less time on teaching; 44% report doing no research, and 44% report spending more than half their time in patient care. Compared to other primary care specialties, the geriatricians reported caring for larger proportions of older patients and spending more time per patient visit. However, their role in teaching, research, and long-term care is minimal.


Subject(s)
Geriatrics , Data Collection , Fellowships and Scholarships , Professional Practice , Research , Teaching , United States
2.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 97(4): 514-20, 1989.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2498947

ABSTRACT

This study tested structural analogs of phencyclidine (PCP) using drug discrimination procedures to determine which analogs produced discriminable effects similar to those of PCP. It also tested the utility of multiple-drug discrimination training (PCP versus other drugs or saline) as a method for increasing the specificity produced by training. All discrimination training took place in two-lever operant compartments using FR-10 reinforcement of presses on the correct lever. During training, rats were required to concurrently discriminate PCP from one or more other drug conditions. Rats in group 1 discriminated PCP (lever 1) versus saline (lever 2). Rats in group 2 discriminated PCP (lever 1) versus saline, fentanyl, phenobarbital, amphetamine, or mescaline (lever 2). In both groups 1 and 2, the required discriminations were rapidly learned. The percentage of PCP choices and the ED50 doses obtained during tests for generalization did not differ significantly in groups 1 and 2. Drugs to which responding on the PCP lever generalized included 1-[1-(2-thienyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine, N-ethyl-1-phenylcyclohexylamine, 1-phenylcyclohexylamine, ketamine, 1-(1-phenylcyclohexyl)morpholine, 1-[1-(2-thienyl)cyclohexyl]morpholine, N,N-diethyl-1-phenylcyclohexylamine, N-(iso-propyl)-1-phenylcyclohexylamine, N-methyl-1-phenylcyclohexylamine, N-(n-propyl)-1-phenylcyclohexylamine, Dextrorphan, (dl)-N-allyl-N-normetazocine, N-N-dimethyl-1-phenylcyclohexylamine, N-(n-butyl)-1-phenylcyclohexylamine, 1-[1-(2-thienyl)cyclohexyl]pyrrolidine, and N-(s-butyl)-1-phenylcyclohexylamine, in agreement with previous reports. Rats in group 3 discriminated PCP (lever 1) versus saline, cyclazocine, dextrorphan, phenobarbital, or mescaline (lever 2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Discrimination Learning/drug effects , Phencyclidine/analogs & derivatives , Phencyclidine/pharmacology , Animals , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Male , Rats
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL