ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Infants with prematurity, low birthweight, and medical comorbidities are at high risk for developmental delays and neurodevelopmental disabilities and require close monitoring. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, high-risk infant follow-up (HRIF) programs have adapted to perform developmental assessments via telehealth. OBJECTIVES: Describe the referral rates to initiate, continue, or increase/add early intervention (EI) therapies based on in-person use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 4th Edition (BSID-IV) or telehealth use of the Developmental Assessment in Young Children, 2nd Edition (DAYC-2). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 203 patients seen in the HRIF program at an academic medical center in Southern California. Patients were divided into in-person (BSID-IV) and telehealth (DAYC-2) assessment groups. Statistical analyses were performed to describe demographic characteristics, medical information, and referral rates for EI therapies by the types of visits. RESULTS: The in-person and telehealth groups demonstrated similar demographic and clinical characteristics and comparable referral rates for initiating EI therapies. Telehealth patients already receiving therapies were recommended to increase/add EI therapies at a higher rate compared to in-person patients. CONCLUSIONS: The BSID-IV is widely used to assess for developmental delays in the high-risk infant population, but in-person administration of this tool poses limitations on its accessibility. Telehealth administration of an alternative tool, such as the DAYC-2, can lead to similar EI referral rates as in-person administration of the BSID-IV. Increased use of telehealth developmental assessments can promote timely detection of developmental delays and minimize gaps in healthcare access.
