Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neurosci ; 34(30): 9880-90, 2014 Jul 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25057191

ABSTRACT

For learning to occur through trial and error, the nervous system must effectively detect and encode performance errors. To examine this process, we designed a set of oculomotor learning tasks with more than one visual object providing potential error cues, as would occur in a natural visual scene. A task-relevant visual target and a task-irrelevant visual background both influenced vestibulo-ocular reflex learning in rhesus monkeys. Thus, motor learning does not identify a single error cue based on behavioral relevance, but can be simultaneously influenced by more than one cue. Moreover, the relative weighting of the different cues could vary. If the speed of the visual target's motion on the retina was low (≪1°/s), background motion dominated learning, but if target speed was high, the effects of the background were suppressed. The target and background motion had similar, nonlinear effects on the putative neural instructive signals carried by cerebellar climbing fibers, but with a stronger influence of the background on the climbing fibers than on learning. In contrast, putative neural instructive signals carried by the simple spikes of Purkinje cells were influenced solely by the motion of the visual target. Because they are influenced by different cues during training, joint control of learning by the climbing fibers and Purkinje cells may expand the learning capacity of the cerebellar circuit.


Subject(s)
Cerebellum/physiology , Cues , Eye Movements/physiology , Learning/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Purkinje Cells/physiology , Action Potentials/physiology , Animals , Cerebellum/cytology , Head Movements/physiology , Macaca mulatta , Male , Photic Stimulation/methods
2.
Nat Neurosci ; 12(9): 1171-9, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19684593

ABSTRACT

The climbing fiber input to the cerebellum from the inferior olive is thought to act as a teacher whose activity controls the induction of motor learning. We designed training conditions that did not elicit instructive signals in the climbing fibers, but nevertheless induced robust and consistent motor learning in the vestibulo-ocular reflex of rhesus monkeys. Our results indicate that instructive signals in the climbing fibers are not necessary for cerebellum-dependent learning. Instead, instructive signals carried by either the climbing fibers or Purkinje cell simple spikes may be sufficient to induce motor learning, with additive effects occurring when both instructive signals are present during training.


Subject(s)
Cerebellum/physiology , Learning/physiology , Motor Activity/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Action Potentials , Animals , Cues , Macaca mulatta , Microelectrodes , Physical Stimulation , Purkinje Cells/physiology , Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular/physiology
3.
J Neurophysiol ; 94(5): 3092-100, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16033945

ABSTRACT

Motor learning must be capable of increasing or decreasing the amplitude of movements to meet the demands of the environment. One way to implement such opposite learned changes would be to store them with bidirectional plasticity mechanisms (i.e., long-term potentiation and depression at the same synapses). At the behavioral level, this scheme should result in similar patterns of stimulus generalization of increases and decreases in movement amplitude because the same synapses would be modified but in opposite directions. To test this idea, we quantitatively compared the stimulus generalization of learned increases and decreases in the gain (amplitude) of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) in mice and in monkeys. When examined across different sinusoidal frequencies of head rotation, decreases in VOR gain generalized more than increases in gain. This difference was apparent not only in the gain, but also the phase (timing) of the VOR. Furthermore, this difference held when animals were trained with high-frequency rotational stimuli, a manipulation that enhances frequency generalization. Our results suggest that increases and decreases in VOR gain are not exact inverses at the circuit level. At one or more sites, the plasticity mechanisms supporting decreases in VOR gain must be less synapse-specific, or affect neurons more broadly tuned for head rotation frequency, than the mechanisms supporting increases in gain.


Subject(s)
Eye Movements/physiology , Head Movements/physiology , Motor Skills/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Physical Stimulation/methods , Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular/physiology , Adaptation, Physiological/physiology , Animals , Feedback/physiology , Learning/physiology , Macaca mulatta , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Models, Neurological , Rotation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...