Analysis of deep inspiration breath-hold technique to improve dosimetric and clinical advantages in postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy for thymomas.

Background: Radiation therapy is one of the essential treatment modalities for invasive thymomas. Clinically, respiratory motion poses a challenge for the radiotherapy of thoracic tumors. One method to address this issue is to train patients to hold their breath at the end of deep inspiration. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the dosimetric and clinical advantages of the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique in postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for thymomas. Methods: Thymoma patients undergoing postoperative IMRT were included. Each patient underwent two computed tomography (CT) scans, one under free breath (FB) and the other under DIBH. Dosimetric parameters of organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated in three series plans. Dose analysis and volume comparisons were conducted during FB-3 mm (FB with 3 mm internal target volume margin), FB-10 mm (FB with 10 mm internal target volume margin), and DIBH and compared using a paired sample Student's t-test. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for lungs and heart were calculated and compared. Results: The total lung volume significantly increased by 31% (4,216±198 vs. 2,884±166 mL) and the heart volume reduced by 12% (552±25 vs. 636±35 mL) between DIBH acquisitions compared to FB. A significant improvement was observed in all the dosimetric parameters (Dmean, V20, V5) of the lung on DIBH compared to FB-3 mm (54%±2.85% vs. 47%±2.90%, P<0.001; 15%±1.37% vs. 12%±1.32%, P=0.004; and 10.28±0.58 vs. 8.76±0.57 Gy, P<0.001, respectively), as well as in the Dmax and D2% of the esophagus and spine. The lung volume increment was related to a reduction in the mean dose of lungs, with a correlation coefficient of r=0.27, P=0.03. The NTCP values for pneumonitis significantly reduced with DIBH compared to the FB state (0.6% vs. 1.1%, P<0.001). Conclusions: The radiation dose to the OARs can be significantly reduced by using the DIBH technique in postoperative IMRT for thymomas. The increased volume of lungs using DIBH acquisitions can significantly reduce the incidence of pneumonitis.

Superior survival for breast-conserving therapy over mastectomy in patients with breast cancer: A population-based SEER database analysis across 30 years.

Introduction: It has been believed that breast-conserving therapy (lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiation, Lum + RT) and mastectomy without radiation (Mast + NoRT) have equivalent survival outcomes. However, there is a need to re-evaluate the role of lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiation due to changed breast cancer management over time. This study aimed to conduct a population-based study that compare long-term oncologic survival outcomes after Lum + RT vs Mast + NoRT. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was used to identify female breast cancer patients with a primary localized breast cancer diagnosis from 1988 to 2018. The standardized incidence/mortality ratio (SIR/SMR) for breast cancer recurrence (BCR) and breast cancer-specific death (BSD) was estimated by the SEER*Stat program. Cumulative incidences of BCR and BSD were assessed using Gray's method. We evaluated the effects of Lum + RT vs. Mast + NoRT on breast cancer recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Fine-Gray competing risk model analyses, propensity score-adjusted Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards model analyses were applied. Results: A total of 205,788 women were included in the study. Patients who underwent Lum + RT had higher SIR of BCR (4.14 [95% confidence interval, CI: 3.94-4.34] vs. 1.11 [95% CI: 1.07-1.14]) and lower SMR (9.89 [95% CI: 9.71-10.08] vs. 17.07 [95% CI: 16.82-17.33]) than patients who underwent Mast + NoRT. Lum + RT was associated with higher competing risk of BCR (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.996, 95% CI: 1.925-2.069, p < 0.001) and lower competing risk of BSD when compared to Mast + RT (adjusted HR: 0.584, 95% CI: 0.572-0.597, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed similar results (adjusted HR after PSW for BRFS: 1.792, 95% CI 1.716-1.871, p < 0.001; adjusted HR after PSW for BCSS: 0.706, 95% CI 0.688-0.725, p < 0.001). These findings persisted in the sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Discussion: The present study further confirmed superior long-term survival with lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiation over mastectomy independent of patient characteristics including age, race, time period, historic subtype, tumor size, historic grade and stage, indicating that this benefit may result from the treatment itself.

High expression of GPNMB indicates an unfavorable prognosis in glioma: Combination of data from the GEO and CGGA databases and validation in tissue microarray.

Glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein B (GPNMB), a transmembrane glycoprotein, has been reported to be involved in tumor progression, but its prognostic value for glioma and the mechanistic effects on glioma progression have not been clearly explored. The present study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of GPNMB in glioma and the potential mechanisms of how GPNMB mediates glioma progression. Differentially expressed genes between the four highest and four lowest GPNMB expression samples in the GSE53733 dataset were first determined. Gene ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis and Gene set enrichment analysis results demonstrated that the significantly enriched pathways in samples with high GPNMB expression compared with those with low GPNMB expression were associated with hypoxia, angiogenesis, migration and invasion. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the correlations between GPNMB expression and the markers of hypoxia, angiogenesis, migration and invasion in GSE53733, which were further validated using another mRNA microarray dataset from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA). In addition, using the CGGA dataset, high GPNMB expression was demonstrated to be significantly associated with advanced WHO grade and short survival time in patients with glioma. Of note, based on the immunohistochemical staining of the tissue microarrays, Kaplan-Meier analysis with the Renyi test and a Cox proportional hazards model were used to validate the unfavorable prognostic role of high GPNMB expression in glioma. In conclusion, high GPNMB expression may be associated with high tumor grade and unfavorable prognosis in glioma. GPNMB expression was demonstrated to correlate with the markers of hypoxia, angiogenesis, migration and invasion, which may be potential mechanisms through which GPNMB mediates glioma progression.

Topics related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Metastases to the liver from colorectal cancer (CRC) are common, and only a minority of patients are candidates for upfront surgery at the initial diagnosis. Carefully selected patients can achieve long-term survival from surgery with curative intent. Unfortunately, the risk of recurrence remains substantial after liver resection. In order to reduce the risk of relapse and improve the outcomes, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been assessed for resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) with an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS). In particular, this approach seems to be more beneficial for resectable patients with risk factors associated with unfavorable prognosis. However, controversies still remain as to whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy would bring long-term survival benefit for patients with resectable CRLM, along with the main challenge in identifying those who can benefit greatly from this approach due to lack of well documented selection criteria for patient stratification. In addition, no evidence directly addresses whether targeted agents such as cetuximab and bevacizumab should be offered with chemotherapy in the preoperative setting of resectable patients, despite that these aggressive strategies could result in high response rates. To offer the reader an insight into these complex and unresolved issues we will give an overview of three hot topics related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for initially resectable CRLM.

The prognostic value of pretreatment tumor apparent diffusion coefficient values in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) has increasingly contributed to the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. The objective of this paper was to explore the prognostic significance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in 93 NPC patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included 93 newly diagnosed NPC patients. Pretreatment ADC values were determined and compared with patients' age, gender, alcohol intake, smoking, tumor volume, pathological type, tumor stage, and nodal stage. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated and the values compared between the low and high ADC groups. Multivariate analysis of ADC values and other 9 clinical parameters was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model to test the independent significance for OS, LRFS and DMFS. RESULTS: The mean ADC value for the initial nasopharyngeal tumors was 0.72 × 10-3 mm2/s (range: 0.48-0.97 × 10-3 mm2/s). There was no significant difference between pretreatment ADCs and patient' gender, age, smoking, alcohol intake, or tumor stage. A significant difference in the ADCs for different N stages (P = 0.022) and correlation with initial tumor volume (r = -0.26, P = 0.012) were observed. In comparison, the ADC value for undifferentiated carcinoma was lower than that for other 3 pathological types. With a median follow-up period of 50 months, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 88.2% and 83.3%, respectively, 3-year and 5-year LRFS rates were 93.5% and 93.3%, respectively, and 3-year and 5-year DMFS rates were 83.9% and 83.3%, respectively. Patients with tumor ADC values ≥0.72 × 10-3 mm2/s exhibited longer OS and LRFS periods compared with tumor ADC values <0.72 × 10-3 mm2/s, with P values 0.036 and 0.018, respectively. In addition, patients with deaths or recurrences or distant metastasis had significant lower ADC values than those without disease failures. According to a multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard test, ADC values showed a significant correlation with OS (P = 0.0004), LRFS (P = 0.0009), and DMFS (P < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment tumor ADC values supposed to be a noninvasive important prognostic parameter for NPC.