ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of telemedicine for teaching group diabetes education classes to individuals with diabetes mellitus in a rural medically underserved area. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adults with diabetes from a rural area served by Oswego Hospital in upstate New York were asked to participate in this study. Volunteers received diabetes education through real-time teleconferencing (n=27) by joining age- and sex-matched patients from the Joslin Diabetes Center, Syracuse, NY, in our "Living with Diabetes Class" (n=39). The two 3-h sessions offered comprehensive diabetes education by a diabetes nurse educator, dietitian, and exercise physiologist. These sessions were followed in 3 months by a 3-h follow-up class. Each group receiving tele-education consisted of two or three patients with diabetes. RESULTS: The hemoglobin A1c test (a blood test that estimates the overall average glucose levels over the past 3 months) improved in the face-to-face and the telemedicine groups. There was no significant change in weight between groups. Each group had significant improvements in scores on the Problem Areas In Diabetes survey, which is a measure of emotional functioning in diabetes. Diabetes treatment satisfaction as measured in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire improved in the face-to-face group but not in the telemedicine group. Although the face-to-face group had significantly higher scores in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, the telemedicine group was highly satisfied with the services provided. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine offers an effective alternative approach for providing group diabetes education to individuals with poor access to diabetes education programs.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Medically Underserved Area , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Body Weight , Diet , Exercise , Glycated Hemoglobin , Health Promotion/methods , Humans , Learning , New York , Patient Satisfaction , Telecommunications/organization & administrationABSTRACT
The authors' class structure incorporates individual meal and exercise planning in the group setting. This study was conducted to (1) determine if class participants can create their own meal and exercise plans, (2) determine if class participants feel they will be able to adhere to their meal and exercise plans, and (3) assess adherence to the plans over time. Subjects were recruited from the classes offered at the Joslin Diabetes Center. Following completion of class, patients completed the evaluation questionnaire. Two and 6 months later, study participants received follow-up questionnaires by phone or mail. Among respondents, 63% were able to determine their own carbohydrate goals, with 95.9% indicating they could adhere to the plan, and 82.8% felt the plan would be easier than previous ones. At 2 and 6 months, respectively, 89% and 92% of the participants felt they were following the meal plan either some or most of the time. One hundred percent of the respondents were able to determine their own exercise plan, with 98% indicating they could adhere to the plan, and 85.7% felt the new plan would be easier than previous ones. At 2 and 6 months, respectively, 70% and 73% felt they were following their exercise plan either some or most of the time. Individualized meal and exercise plans can be successfully created in a group setting.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/prevention & control , Exercise Therapy , Menu Planning , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Patient Participation/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Diabetes Mellitus/psychology , Diet, Diabetic , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitals, University , Humans , Life Style , New York , Nursing Evaluation Research , Prescriptions , Program Evaluation , Self Care , Self Efficacy , Self-Assessment , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether diabetes education can be provided as effectively through telemedicine technology as through in-person encounters with diabetes nurse and nutrition educators. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 56 adults with diabetes were randomized to receive diabetes education in person (control group) or via telemedicine (telemedicine group) and were followed prospectively. The education consisted of three consultative visits with diabetes nurse and nutrition educators. The in-person and telemedicine groups were compared using measures of glycemic control (HbA(1c)) and questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction and psychosocial functioning as related to diabetes. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, immediately after the completion of diabetes education, and 3 months after the third educational visit. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction was high in the telemedicine group. Problem Areas in Diabetes scale scores improved significantly with diabetes education (adjusted P < 0.05, before vs. immediately after education and 3 months after education), and the attainment of behavior-change goals did not differ between groups. With diabetes education, HbA(1c) improved from 8.6 +/- 1.8% at baseline to 7.8 +/- 1.5% immediately after education and 7.8 +/- 1.8% 3 months after the third educational visit (unadjusted P < 0.001, P = 0.089 adjusted for BMI and age), with similar changes observed in the telemedicine and in-person groups. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes education via telemedicine and in person was equally effective in improving glycemic control, and both methods were well accepted by patients. Reduced diabetes-related stress was observed in both groups. These data suggest that telemedicine can be successfully used to provide diabetes education to patients.
