Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of prazosin versus placebo for the treatment of nightmares and sleep disturbances in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder.

UNLABELLED: Although sleep disturbances occur commonly in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and are associated with adverse outcomes and increased suicidality, they are often inadequately addressed by antidepressant medications. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to assess whether prazosin reduces nightmares, sleep disturbances, and illness severity in adults with PTSD. METHOD: Electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO) were searched in September 2014 for randomized controlled trials in adults. Search terms included posttraumatic stress disorder, prazosin, nightmares, and sleep disturbance. Included studies used prazosin and provided objective outcome data related to nightmares and/or sleep quality. RESULTS: Six studies (191 participants) met the criteria for inclusion. Prazosin was more effective than placebo in improving nightmares (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.022, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.41, 1.62], p = .001), sleep quality (SMD = 0.93, 95% CI [-0.02, 1.88], p = .054; and SMD = 1.14, 95% CI [0.24, 2.03], p = .01), and illness severity (SMD = 1.20, 95% CI [0.79, 1.61], p = .001, with no significant effect on systolic (SMD = -0.01, 95% CI [-0.40, 0.37], p = .94) or diastolic (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.68], p = .154) blood pressure. CONCLUSION: PTSD-related nightmares, sleep disturbances, and overall illness severity showed a significant response to treatment with prazosin. With careful dose titration, prazosin was well tolerated and had no significant sustained effect on blood pressure.

Sex-dependent metabolic, neuroendocrine, and cognitive responses to dietary energy restriction and excess.

Females and males typically play different roles in survival of the species and would be expected to respond differently to food scarcity or excess. To elucidate the physiological basis of sex differences in responses to energy intake, we maintained groups of male and female rats for 6 months on diets with usual, reduced [20% and 40% caloric restriction (CR), and intermittent fasting (IF)], or elevated (high-fat/high-glucose) energy levels and measured multiple physiological variables related to reproduction, energy metabolism, and behavior. In response to 40% CR, females became emaciated, ceased cycling, underwent endocrine masculinization, exhibited a heightened stress response, increased their spontaneous activity, improved their learning and memory, and maintained elevated levels of circulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor. In contrast, males on 40% CR maintained a higher body weight than the 40% CR females and did not change their activity levels as significantly as the 40% CR females. Additionally, there was no significant change in the cognitive ability of the males on the 40% CR diet. Males and females exhibited similar responses of circulating lipids (cholesterols/triglycerides) and energy-regulating hormones (insulin, leptin, adiponectin, ghrelin) to energy restriction, with the changes being quantitatively greater in males. The high-fat/high-glucose diet had no significant effects on most variables measured but adversely affected the reproductive cycle in females. Heightened cognition and motor activity, combined with reproductive shutdown, in females may maximize the probability of their survival during periods of energy scarcity and may be an evolutionary basis for the vulnerability of women to anorexia nervosa.