Comparative study of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy versus perineal stapler resection for external full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients: enhanced outcomes and reduced recurrence rates-a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In elderly patients with external full-thickness rectal prolapse (EFTRP), the exact differences in postoperative recurrence and functional outcomes between laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) and perineal stapler resection (PSR) have not yet been investigated. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study on 330 elderly patients divided into LVMR group (n = 250) and PSR (n = 80) from April 2012 to April 2019. Patients were evaluated before and after surgery by Wexner incontinence scale, Altomare constipation scale, and patient satisfaction questionnaire. The primary outcomes were incidence and risk factors for EFTRP recurrence. Secondary outcomes were postoperative incontinence, constipation, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: LVMR was associated with fewer postoperative complications (p < 0.001), lower prolapse recurrence (p < 0.001), lower Wexner incontinence score (p = 0.03), and lower Altomare's score (p = 0.047). Furthermore, LVMR demonstrated a significantly higher surgery-recurrence interval (p < 0.001), incontinence improvement (p = 0.019), and patient satisfaction (p < 0.001) than PSR. Three and 13 patients developed new symptoms in LVMR and PSR, respectively. The predictors for prolapse recurrence were LVMR (associated with 93% risk reduction of recurrence, OR 0.067, 95% CI 0.03-0.347, p = 0.001), symptom duration (prolonged duration was associated with an increased risk of recurrence, OR 1.131, 95% CI 1.036-1.236, p = 0.006), and length of prolapse (increased length was associated with a high recurrence risk (OR = 1.407, 95% CI = 1.197-1.655, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LVMR is safe for EFTRP treatment in elderly patients with low recurrence, and improved postoperative functional outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial.gov (NCT05915936), retrospectively registered on June 14, 2023.

Glasgow aneurysm score predicts the outcome after emergency open repair of symptomatic, unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictor factors of in-hospital postoperative mortality in patients presenting with symptomatic but not ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients who underwent urgent open repair for symptomatic, non-ruptured AAA were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Five patients (11.9%) died during the in-hospital stay. History of coronary artery disease (p=0.014), cerebrovascular diseases (p=0.015), renal failure according to Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS) criteria (p=0.001), serum creatinine concentration (p=0.026), and the GAS (p=0.008) were predictive of postoperative death. The ROC curve analysis showed that the Glasgow Aneurysm Score had an area under the curve of 0.870 (95%C.I. 0.71-1, S.E. 0.08, p=0.008), and its best cut-off value in predicting postoperative death was 90.0 (specificity 89.2%, sensitivity 80.0%). The postoperative mortality rate of patients with a Glasgow Aneurysm Score below 90 was 2.9%, whereas it was 50% for those with a score >or=90 (p=0.003, O.R. 33.0). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the Glasgow Aneurysm Score is a good predictor of postoperative mortality and morbidity after urgent repair of symptomatic, non-ruptured AAA and can be useful in identifying those patients whose operative risk is prohibitive. Its simplicity makes it a clinically important tool, particularly, in the emergency setting. Patients having a score less than 90 can safely undergo urgent open repair. Thorough evaluation and improvement of preoperative status followed preferably by an endovascular repair is indicated for those with a score >or=90.