Small bowel obstruction precipitated by intussusception of Meckel's diverticulum.

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) secondary to intussusception of Meckel's diverticulum (MD) is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain that may warrant urgent surgical treatment. Volvulus or intussusception of the small bowel with presence of MD as the lead point is the most commonly reported etiology of Meckel's related obstructions. We report an interesting case of a small bowel obstruction caused by the intussusception of an MD within its own lumen. The case involves a 30-year-old male who presented to the emergency room with acute, severe abdominal pain with an abdominal computed tomography (CT) showing a distal high-grade SBO. Decision was made to take the patient to the operating room urgently due to his clinical examination and radiologic imaging, specifically CT scan. Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed and subsequently converted to an exploratory laparotomy, which revealed the intussuscepted MD with focal necrosis into the distal small bowel causing an SBO. A segmental small bowel resection with hand sewn primary anastomosis was performed. The case presents an interesting challenge in deciding when to take a patient with an SBO to the operating room versus initial conservative management and what the treatment should be if an MD is encountered. In addition, the case emphasizes the importance of history and physical exam findings in coordination with radiologic imaging in helping to make appropriate decisions in a timely manner for operative vs conservative management of an SBO. It reminds us that, Meckel's diverticulum, although less commonly the cause of a small bowel obstruction in the adult population, needs to be on the differential diagnosis and we need to have a high clinical suspicion for this possibility to ensure appropriate treatment in a timely manner.

Endoscopic Transaxillary Approach for Breast Augmentation: What does the Evidence Say and What Else Can be Done?

Breast augmentation is the most commonly performed aesthetic procedure. Transaxillary approach is one of the widely accepted techniques for breast augmentation. It has an advantage of the remote nature of the access incision related to the breasts, thereby reducing the visibility of the scar. This is a letter to the editor of the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery journal about the study by Nguyen and to on comparison of endoscopic transaxillary and periareolar techniques in breast augmentation. We have talked about the advantages of the transaxillary approach compared to other techniques and presented the evidence. We recommend future studies comparing the transaxillary, periareolar, and inframammary approaches for breast augmentation with a large cohort and systematic reviews on the same topic. Studies can also be done by combining the cell-assisted lipotransfer with fat graft and endoscopic transaxillary approach for breast augmentation to determine if it provides the best outcome with minimal complications.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Letter to the Editor: The Efficacy of Cell-Assisted Lipotransfer Versus Conventional Lipotransfer in Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This is a letter to the editor about a meta-analysis titled "The efficacy of cell-assisted lipotransfer versus conventional lipotransfer in breast augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis" by Li and Chen published in the year 2021. The most frequently performed aesthetic procedure is breast augmentation surgery. In breast augmentation, cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL) has received high recognition due to its positive outcomes. There are controversies in the medical literature on the use of CAL for breast augmentation. This meta-analysis by Li and Chen has concluded that CAL using ASC was superior to other methods as it improved fat survival rate in breast augmentation. We have written this letter to the editor of the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery journal about this meta-analysis because of its impactful information provided by this study to the medical literature for breast augmentation surgery using cell-assisted lipotransfer. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the prevention and control of peritoneal metastasis in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Peritoneal metastasis is associated with poor prognosis, with studies in the literature reporting the survival of peritoneal metastasis without treatment to be three to six months. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has shown positive outcomes by improving the prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials was done to determine the prophylactic role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in preventing and controlling peritoneal metastasis gastrointestinal origin. Randomized controlled trials published between January 2019 to June 2021 were included. The databases used were MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), and the Cochrane library. Cochrane handbook for systematic review of intervention was used to assess the risk of bias in included trials. The results were reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of five trials met the inclusion criteria. Two studies were on patients with gastric cancer, and the other three studies were on patients with colorectal cancer. HIPEC was given to a total of 116 gastric cancer patients and 308 colorectal cancer patients. In all the included studies on patients with gastric cancer, the peritoneal recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in the group that received HIPEC. There was no significant improvement in peritoneal-free survival in patients with colorectal cancer who received HIPEC. HIPEC appears to be effective in preventing peritoneal metastasis in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer without minimal postoperative complications. However, in patients with advanced colorectal malignancy, HIPEC does not seem to play a crucial role in preventing and controlling peritoneal metastasis.

Renal artery dissection as an overuse Injury.

The diagnosis of renal infarction is often convoluted due to its non-specific presentation. It can mimic disease processes as disparate as pyelonephritis, diverticulitis, or nephrolithiasis. This case is further complicated by the presence of a pelvic kidney with triplicate arterial input. It is difficult to estimate the incidence of pelvic kidneys as the numerous sources vary wildly in their estimations; however, the paucity information, in and of itself, speaks to the rarity of the condition. In this case, a 58-year-old male presents to the emergency department after experiencing sharp, sudden, and severe groin pain while swinging a golf club. The patient was noted to have an abnormally high systolic blood pressure in the 170s and hematuria, but all other initial labs and assessments were unremarkable. An initial computed tomography scan with intravenous contrast of the abdomen and pelvis showed partial necrosis of a pelvic kidney. Follow-up computed tomography angiography revealed that a dissection in one of the arteries supplying the kidney created an infarction and resultant necrosis. Vessel size, location and time between injury and diagnosis made endovascular intervention impractical. The patient was started on aspirin and Plavix, observed for 3 days and sent home.