Secukinumab in Pediatric Patients with Plaque Psoriasis: Pooled Safety Analysis from Two Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Plaque psoriasis affects ~ 1% of the pediatric population, negatively impacting quality of life. The efficacy and safety of secukinumab in pediatric patients with moderate to severe or severe chronic plaque psoriasis have been established in two pivotal phase 3 trials (open-label, NCT03668613; double-blind, NCT02471144). OBJECTIVES: The aims were to report the pooled safety of secukinumab up to 52 weeks from two studies in subgroups of pediatric patients stratified by age and bodyweight, and to present, alongside the pediatric data, the pooled safety data from four pivotal adult secukinumab trials. METHODS: The safety of secukinumab was evaluated in subgroups of pediatric patients defined by age (6 to < 12 and 12 to < 18 years) and bodyweight (< 25 kg, 25 to < 50 kg, and ≥ 50 kg) in the pooled population. Patients received secukinumab low dose (LD; 75/75/150 mg), secukinumab high dose (HD; 75/150/300 mg), placebo, or etanercept (0.8 mg/kg). For safety analyses, data were pooled from the pediatric studies NCT03668613 and NCT02471144, and presented alongside the pooled data from four adult pivotal studies (NCT01365455, NCT01636687, NCT01358578, NCT01555125). RESULTS: A total of 198 pediatric patients (overall exposure: 184.6 patient-years [PY]) and 1989 adult patients (1749.5 PY) receiving secukinumab up to week 52 were included in this analysis. At week 52, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was lower in the lower age and bodyweight subgroups. The AEs reported within these subgroups were consistent with the overall AEs reported in this analysis. Overall, exposure-adjusted incidence rates for treatment-emergent AEs were lower in the secukinumab-treated pediatric pool (198.8/100 PY) compared with the etanercept (266.3/100 PY) and adult pools (256.1/100 PY). Up to 52 weeks, the incidence rates of the AEs in the secukinumab-treated patients in the 6 to < 12 years subgroup and 12 to < 18 years subgroup were 167.7/100 PY and 214.7/100 PY, respectively. Similarly, incidence rates of the AEs in the secukinumab-treated patients in the < 25 kg, 25 kg to < 50 kg, and ≥ 50 kg subgroups were 177.3/100 PY, 192.5/100 PY, and 206.8/100 PY, respectively. Nasopharyngitis was the most frequently reported AE in secukinumab-treated pediatric patients across age (< 12 years: 11.8/100 PY; ≥ 12 years: 42.4/100 PY) and bodyweight (< 25 kg: 22.8/100 PY; 25 kg to < 50 kg: 19.0/100 PY; ≥ 50 kg: 43.0/100 PY). Of the 198 secukinumab-treated pediatric patients, one reported nail Candida, one reported skin Candida, and two reported vulvovaginal Candida. Transient and mostly mild events of neutropenia were observed with secukinumab, none leading to study treatment discontinuation. No incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies was reported in pediatric patients treated with secukinumab. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab was well tolerated in pediatric patients with moderate to severe and severe plaque psoriasis across age and bodyweight subgroups. The overall safety profile of secukinumab in pediatric patients was consistent with that of adult patients. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03668613 (Novartis Study Code CAIN457A2311, referred to as A2311), actual study start date: August 29, 2018; actual primary completion date: September 19, 2019; estimated study completion date: September 14, 2023. NCT02471144 (Novartis Study Code CAIN457A2310, referred to as A2310), study start date: September 29, 2015; primary completion date: December 13, 2018; estimated study completion date: March 31, 2023.

Secukinumab in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (SUNSHINE and SUNRISE): week 16 and week 52 results of two identical, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: Few therapeutic options are available for patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa. We aimed to assess the efficacy of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa in two randomised trials. METHODS: SUNSHINE and SUNRISE were identical, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trials done in 219 primary sites in 40 countries. Patients aged 18 years old or older with the capacity to provide written informed consent and with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (defined as a total of ≥5 inflammatory lesions affecting ≥2 distinct anatomical areas) for at least 1 year were eligible for inclusion. Included patients also agreed to daily use of topical over-the-counter antiseptics on the areas affected by hidradenitis suppurativa lesions while on study treatment. Patients were excluded if they had 20 or more fistulae at baseline, had ongoing active conditions requiring treatment with prohibited medication (eg, systemic biological immunomodulating treatment, live vaccines, or other investigational treatments), or met other exclusion criteria. In both trials, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by means of interactive response technology to receive subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks, subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks, or subcutaneous placebo all via a 2 mL prefilled syringe in a double-dummy method as per treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response, defined as a decrease in abscess and inflammatory nodule count by 50% or more with no increase in the number of abscesses or in the number of draining fistulae compared with baseline, at week 16, assessed in the overall population. Hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response was calculated based on the number of abscesses, inflammatory nodules, draining fistulae, total fistulae, and other lesions in the hidradenitis suppurativa affected areas. Safety was assessed by evaluating the presence of adverse events and serious adverse events according to common terminology criteria for adverse events, which were coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terminology. Both the SUNSHINE, NCT03713619, and SUNRISE, NCT03713632, trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. FINDINGS: Between Jan 31, 2019, and June 7, 2021, 676 patients were screened for inclusion in the SUNSHINE trial, of whom 541 (80%; 304 [56%] women and 237 [44%] men; mean age 36·1 years [SD 11·7]) were included in the analysis (181 [33%] in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 180 [33%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 180 [33%] in the placebo group). Between the same recruitment dates, 687 patients were screened for inclusion in the SUNRISE trial, of whom 543 (79%; 306 [56%] women and 237 [44%] men; mean age 36·3 [11·4] years) were included in the analysis (180 [33%] in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 180 [33%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 183 [34%] in the placebo group). In the SUNSHINE trial, significantly more patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group had a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (rounded average number of patients with response in 100 imputations, 81·5 [45%] of 181 patients) compared with the placebo group (60·7 [34%] of 180 patients; odds ratio 1·8 [95% CI 1·1-2·7]; p=0·0070). However, there was no significant difference between the number of patients in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group (75·2 [42%] of 180 patients) and the placebo group (1·5 [1·0-2·3]; p=0·042). Compared with the placebo group (57·1 [31%] of 183 patients), significantly more patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group (76·2 [42%] of 180 patients; 1·6 [1·1-2·6]; p=0·015) and the secukinumab every 4 weeks group (83·1 [46%] of 180 patients; 1·9 [1·2-3·0]; p=0·0022) had a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response in the SUNRISE trial. Patient responses were sustained up to the end of the trials at week 52. The most common adverse event by preferred term up to week 16 was headache in both the SUNSHINE (17 [9%] patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 20 [11%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 14 [8%] in the placebo group) and SUNRISE (21 [12%] patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 17 [9%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 15 [8%] in the placebo group) trials. No study-related deaths were reported up to week 16. The safety profile of secukinumab in both trials was consistent with that previously reported, with no new or unexpected safety findings detected. INTERPRETATION: When given every 2 weeks, secukinumab was clinically effective at rapidly improving signs and symptoms of hidradenitis suppurativa with a favourable safety profile and with sustained response up to 52 weeks of treatment. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma.

Efficacy of Secukinumab Across Subgroups and Overall Safety in Pediatric Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Week 52 Results from a Phase III Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of biologic treatments for children and adolescents with moderate to severe psoriasis should be examined over a considerable time period and in different subgroups. OBJECTIVE: We report the efficacy and safety of secukinumab low dose (LD) and high dose (HD) regimens in pediatric patients with moderate to severe psoriasis for up to Week 52. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study in patients aged  6 to < 18 years. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive LD (75/75/150 mg; N = 42) or HD (75/150/300 mg; N = 42) subcutaneous secukinumab. At randomization, patients were stratified by weight (< 25, 25 to < 50, ≥ 50 kg) and disease severity (moderate/severe). The study is ongoing; the present analysis included data up to Week 52 collected from August 29, 2018 (first patient first visit) to May 28, 2020 (last patient last visit for Week 52). Efficacy was measured using Investigator's Global Assessment modified 2011 0/1 (IGA 0/1) and Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75/90/100 response. Safety outcomes included assessment of adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 84 enrolled patients, 78 (92.9%) completed 52 weeks of treatment. Overall, response rates for PASI 75 and IGA 0/1 were similar between the LD (92.8/88.9%) and HD (93.3/84.7%) groups at Week 52. In the LD and HD groups, PASI 90/100 responses at Week 52 were 78.7/53.5% and 84.7/70.0%, respectively. The proportions of IGA 0/1 and PASI 75/90 responders were comparable for the age, body weight, and disease severity subgroups in the secukinumab LD and HD groups. Mean absolute PASI change from baseline at week 52 was - 17.3 ± standard deviation 5.0 and - 18.2 ± 7.0, a percentage change of - 94.3 and - 94.5% for the LD and HD groups, respectively. More than 70% of evaluable patients achieved Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 at Week 52 (LD 70.7%; HD 70.3%). The safety profile was consistent with that in adults, with no new safety signals for either secukinumab dosing regimen. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of pediatric patients with psoriasis responded to both dosing regimens of secukinumab and maintained clinical responses through 52 weeks of treatment. No clinical difference was observed in the efficacy of secukinumab across the pediatric subgroups. Safety events were consistent with the established safety profile of secukinumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03668613.

Long-term Safety of Secukinumab Over Five Years in Patients with Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis: Update on Integrated Pooled Clinical Trial and Post-marketing Surveillance Data.

Secukinumab, a selective interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitor, is approved for use in adult and paediatric psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. The aim of this study was to report the long-term safety of secukinumab in pooled data from 28 clinical trials and a post-marketing safety surveillance in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients. Analyses included 12,637 secukinumab-treated patients, corresponding to 15,063, 5,985 and 3,527 patient-years of exposure in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients, respectively. Incidences of serious adverse events were low, with no identifiable patterns across indications. Active tuberculosis or latent tuberculosis infections were rare. The incidence of opportunistic infections was < 0.2/100 patient-years, the incidence of malignancy was ≤ 1/100 patient-years, and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was < 0.7/100 patient-years, with no apparent increases over time. Secukinumab demonstrated a favourable safety profile for up to 5 years of treatment across the 3 indications, and no new safety signals were identified.

Secukinumab dosing every 2 weeks demonstrated superior efficacy compared with dosing every 4 weeks in patients with psoriasis weighing 90 kg or more: results of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a common comorbidity of psoriasis and can attenuate response to biologic treatment. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) vs. secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) in patients with a higher bodyweight. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group trial, 331 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis weighing ≥ 90 kg were randomized to receive secukinumab 300 mg Q2W or secukinumab 300 mg Q4W. Patients who did not achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 at week 16 on the Q4W regimen were reallocated to remain on the Q4W regimen or uptitrate to Q2W. RESULTS: At week 16, Q2W dosing (n = 165) led to significantly higher PASI 90 responses vs. Q4W [n = 166; 73.2% vs. 55.5%, one-sided P-value = 0.0003, odds ratio estimate (95% confidence intervals): 2.3 (1.4-3.8)]. At week 52, higher efficacy responses were maintained in the Q2W arm (n = 165) vs. Q4W (n = 83); PASI 75: 88.9% vs. 74.8%; PASI 90: 76.4% vs. 52.4%; PASI 100: 46.7% vs. 27.3%; Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1: 75.9% vs. 55.6% and Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1: 66.1% vs. 48.8%. PASI 90 nonresponders at week 16 who uptitrated to Q2W (n = 31) showed higher efficacy responses at week 32 (16 weeks post-uptitration, PASI 90: 38.7% vs. 16.5%) vs. those who remained on Q4W (n = 40). Safety results were comparable across treatment arms and consistent with the established secukinumab safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab 300 mg Q2W demonstrated superior and sustained efficacy compared with Q4W in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis weighing ≥ 90 kg. PASI 90 nonresponders derived additional benefits from uptitration to a Q2W regimen (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03504852). What is already known about this topic? Obesity is a common comorbidity of psoriasis and can attenuate response to biologic treatment. Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes interleukin-17A in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Subgroup analyses of previous study results and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling data suggest that heavier patients may benefit from higher exposure to secukinumab through an increased dosing frequency [300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) vs. every 4 weeks (Q4W)]. What does this study add? Over 52 weeks, secukinumab 300 mg Q2W demonstrated superior efficacy compared with secukinumab 300 mg Q4W in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis weighing ≥90 kg, with comparable safety results, consistent with the established secukinumab safety profile. In patients who did not achieve PASI 90 at week 16 on the Q4W regimen, uptitration to the Q2W regimen at week 16 resulted in improved efficacy responses through week 52 after switching.

Efficacy, tolerability, patient usability, and satisfaction with a 2 mL pre-filled syringe containing secukinumab 300 mg in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: results from the phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ALLURE study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence shows good tolerability in patients for subcutaneous injection volumes up to 3 mL. OBJECTIVES: We investigated efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of secukinumab 300 mg/2 mL pre-filled syringe (PFS) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: ALLURE was a 52-week, multicenter, randomized (1:1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Co-primary endpoints were secukinumab Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75 and Investigator's Global Assessment modified 2011 0/1 (IGA mod 2011 0 or 1) responses at week 12 versus placebo. Other endpoints included the Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ), and the ability to follow the instructions for use (IFU). RESULTS: Overall, 214 patients were randomized. The secukinumab 300 mg/2 mL PFS showed superiority over placebo for both PASI 75 (88.9% versus 1.7%; p<.0001) and IGA mod 2011 0 or 1 (76.4% versus 1.4%; p<.0001) responses at week 12. All secondary efficacy endpoints were met. The SIAQ scores were similar across groups and improved similarly over 12 weeks. All patients completed critical steps in the IFU at week 1. CONCLUSIONS: The secukinumab 300 mg/2 mL PFS groups showed superiority versus placebo, and it was a safe, effective, and convenient option for patients with psoriasis. NCT02748863.

A phase 3 open-label, randomized multicenter study to evaluate efficacy and safety of secukinumab in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: 24-week results.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis affects 0.13%-2.1% of children and adolescents. Despite a high unmet need, the current treatment options approved for pediatric psoriasis are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 secukinumab dosage regimens (low dose: 75/75/150 mg; high dose: 75/150/300 mg) stratified and randomized by weight (<25 kg, 25 to <50 kg, ≥50 kg) and disease severity (moderate, severe) in pediatric patients aged 6-<18 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: This is a phase 3, open-label, randomized, multicenter study (NCT03668613). RESULTS: Both secukinumab doses were superior to historical placebo with respect to psoriasis area and severity index (PASI)-75/90 and investigator global assessment 0/1 responses at week 12. The estimated probability of a positive treatment effect (ie, log odds ratio > 0) for low- or high-dose secukinumab compared to historical placebo is 1 (ie, 100%). For the low and high doses at week 12, the investigator global assessment 0/1 response rates were 78.6% and 83.3%, respectively, and the PASI-90 response rates were 69% and 76.2%, respectively. The PASI-75 response rate was 92.9% for both the doses. LIMITATIONS: This is an open-label study design without a control arm. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab dosing regimens were efficacious and well tolerated in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Secukinumab demonstrates efficacy, safety, and tolerability upon administration by 2 ml autoinjector in adult patients with plaque psoriasis: 52-week results from MATURE, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Convenient administration is an important factor for treatment adherence in patients with psoriasis. MATURE study reports the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of secukinumab 300 mg 2 ml autoinjector (AI) from MATURE trial (NCT03589885). Eligible patients were randomized to secukinumab 300 mg 2 ml AI or 2× 1 ml prefilled syringe (PFS) or placebo. The co-primary endpoints were psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 75 and investigator's global assessment (IGA) 0/1 response rates at Week 12 versus placebo. Other endpoints included PASI90/100 response, dermatology life quality index (DLQI) 0/1, PKs, 2 ml AI usability rated using self-injection assessment questionnaire (SIAQ), and safety. The study met both co-primary and secondary endpoints (p < 0.0001). Secukinumab 300 mg 2 ml AI and 2× 1 ml PFS treatments led to superior PASI75/90/100 (2 ml AI: 95.1%/75.6%/43.9%; 2× 1 mL PFS: 83.2%/62.6%/37.5% and placebo: 10%/5.0%/0.0%, respectively), IGA, and DLQI 0/1 responses compared with placebo, and efficacy was sustained through 52 weeks. SIAQ results showed high usability of self-injection with 2 mL AI device. No new safety signals were observed. Study design may bias the interpretation of safety profile after Week 12, due to different exposure of secukinumab versus placebo. Secukinumab 300 mg administered with the 2 mL AI demonstrated superior efficacy over placebo, good tolerability, and convenient administration.

Licogliflozin, a Novel SGLT1 and 2 Inhibitor: Body Weight Effects in a Randomized Trial in Adults with Overweight or Obesity.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the dose response of licogliflozin, a dual inhibitor of sodium/glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) and 2 (SGLT2), by evaluating change in body weight in adults with overweight or obesity. METHODS: This dose-response analysis evaluated change in body weight following 24 weeks with four once-daily and twice-daily licogliflozin doses (2.5-150 mg) versus placebo (primary end point). A further 24-week analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of two once-daily licogliflozin doses in maintaining initial weight reduction. RESULTS: Licogliflozin once daily or twice daily produced a significant dose-response signal for weight loss versus placebo (P < 0.0001). However, mean adjusted percent changes in body weight after 24 weeks were modest, ranging from -0.45% to -3.83% (in the 50 mg twice daily group [95% CI: -5.26% to -2.48%]; n = 75). Responder analysis of ≥ 5% weight loss at week 24 revealed significant differences versus placebo, which were most pronounced with highest doses of 50 mg twice daily (45.3%) and 150 mg once daily (42.9%) (both P < 0.01). While weight loss was greater at higher doses, gastrointestinal adverse events were also more frequent. The 50-mg once-daily dose had perhaps the best balance between efficacy and tolerability. CONCLUSIONS: Licogliflozin produced significant reductions in body weight versus placebo. However, the magnitude of weight reduction was modest.

Dose-dependent reduction in body weight with LIK066 (licogliflozin) treatment in Japanese patients with obesity.

AIMS: LIK066 (licogliflozin) is a dual sodium glucose co-transporter 1/2 inhibitor with potential benefits in weight loss. This study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability and safety of licogliflozin in Japanese adults with obesity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study to evaluate the effect of licogliflozin (2.5, 10, 25 and 50 mg once daily) in 126 Japanese patients with obesity. The primary objective was to examine the dose-response relationship of licogliflozin treatment in body weight reduction relative to placebo at 12 weeks. The secondary objectives included assessment of responder rates, change in parameters related to complications, visceral and subcutaneous fat area, and safety during 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The placebo-subtracted least square mean percentage change in body weight from baseline at week 12 was -1.99 (95% confidence interval -2.92, -0.21), -3.00 (-4.15, -1.70), -3.54 (-4.54, -2.26) and - 3.91% (-5.01, -2.77) in licogliflozin 2.5, 10, 25 and 50 mg once-daily dose groups, respectively. The proportion of responders with ≥3% reduction in body weight in the licogliflozin 2.5, 10, 25 and 50 mg once-daily dose groups were 15.8%, 55.6%, 50.0% and 56.7%, respectively, versus placebo [7.1%; P ≤0.002 for all except the 2.5 mg once-daily group (P = 0.39)]. Dose-dependent reductions were observed significantly in haemoglobin A1c, uric acid, fasting plasma glucose and potentially in the waist circumference, diastolic blood pressure and visceral fat area. CONCLUSION: Dual inhibition of SGLT1/2 with licogliflozin treatment induced a dose-dependent reduction in body weight in Japanese patients with obesity. Treatment with licogliflozin was safe and well tolerated in this study. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03320941).

Effects of the dual sodium-glucose linked transporter inhibitor, licogliflozin vs placebo or empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure.

AIMS: Explore the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the dual sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 1 and 2 inhibitor, licogliflozin in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure. METHODS: This multicentre, parallel-group phase IIA study randomized 125 patients with T2DM and heart failure (New York Heart Association II-IV; plasma N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] >300 pg/mL) to licogliflozin (2.5 mg, 10 mg, 50 mg) taken at bedtime, empagliflozin (25 mg) or placebo (44 patients completed the study). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in NT-proBNP after 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, weight, blood pressure, fasting lipid profile, high-sensitivity c-reactive protein, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Licogliflozin 10 mg for 12 weeks significantly reduced NT-proBNP vs placebo (Geometric mean ratio 0.56 [95% confidence interval: 0.33, 0.95], P = .033). A trend was observed with 50 mg licogliflozin (0.64 [95% confidence interval: 0.40, 1.03], P = .064), with no difference between licogliflozin and empagliflozin. The largest numerical decreases in glycated haemoglobin were with licogliflozin 50 mg (-0.58 ± 0.34%) and empagliflozin (-0.44 ± 1.18%) vs placebo (-0.04 ± 0.91%). The reduction in body weight was similar with licogliflozin 50 mg (-2.15 ± 2.40 kg) and empagliflozin (-2.25 ± 1.89 kg). A numerical reduction in systolic blood pressure was seen with licogliflozin 50 mg (-9.54 ± 16.88 mmHg) and empagliflozin (-6.98 ± 15.03 mmHg) vs placebo (-2.85 ± 11.97 mmHg). Adverse events (AEs) were mild, including hypotension (6.5%), hypoglycaemia (8.1%) and inadequate diabetes control (1.6%). The incidence of diarrhoea (4.9%) was lower than previously reported. CONCLUSION: The reduction in NT-proBNP with licogliflozin suggests a potential benefit of SGLT1 and 2 inhibition in patients with T2DM and heart failure.

Pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and efficacy of aliskiren in pediatric patients with hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety profile of aliskiren in pediatric patients (6-17 years old) with hypertension. METHODS: Patients were randomized to a single weight-based dose of either 2 mg/kg (n = 19) or 6 mg/kg (n = 20) of aliskiren daily for 8 days. The PK, pharmacodynamics, safety profile, and efficacy of aliskiren were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 39 randomized patients, 37 (94.9%) completed the study. Aliskiren plasma concentration (maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve) increased dose dependently, achieving peak concentrations in 1 to 2 hours, and t(max) was comparable across the dose and age groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported in 18 (46.2%) patients, with headache, abdominal pain, and nausea being the most frequent. CONCLUSIONS: Aliskiren 2 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg daily showed dose-dependent increases in the plasma concentration. The drug was well tolerated in hypertensive children aged 6 to 17 years. AEs were generally mild and not related to either the drug or the dose.

Antihypertensive treatment in patients with class 3 obesity.

BACKGROUND: Even though patients with class 3 obesity (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m(2)) are prone to arterial hypertension and respond less to antihypertensive drugs, they are not considered in hypertension treatment guidelines and data from prospective clinical trials are lacking. METHODS: In a post hoc analysis of a clinical trial, we compared patients with class 3 obesity with patients with class 1/2 obesity. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Blood pressure control in class 3 obesity was less likely to be achieved with hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy. While addition of amlodipine, irbesartan, or aliskiren to hydrochlorothiazide improved the blood pressure response, amlodipine was less effective and induced peripheral edema in 19% of patients with class 3 obesity.

Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, remodelling, and clinical outcomes among patients with diabetes following myocardial infarction and the influence of direct renin inhibition with aliskiren.

AIMS: We assessed the relationship between diabetes and cardiac structure and function following myocardial infarction (MI) and whether diabetes influences the effect of direct renin inhibition on change in left ventricular (LV) size. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ASPIRE trial enrolled 820 patients 2-8 weeks after MI with ejection fraction ≤ 45% and randomized them to the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren (n= 423) or placebo (n = 397) added to standard medical therapy. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and after 36 weeks in 672 patients with evaluable paired studies. Compared with non-diabetic patients, diabetic patients (n = 214) were at higher risk for a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, heart failure hospitalization, recurrent MI, stroke, or aborted sudden death (14 vs. 7%; adjusted hazard ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.01-2.64, P= 0.045), despite similar left ventricular ejection fraction (37.9 ± 5.3 vs. 37.6 ± 5.2%, P= 0.48) and end-systolic volume (ESV) (84 ± 25 vs. 82 ± 28 mL, P= 0.46). Diabetic patients demonstrated greater concentric remodelling (relative wall thickness 0.38 ± 0.07 vs. 0.36 ± 0.07, P= 0.0002) and evidence of higher LV filling pressure (E/E' 11.1 ± 5.3 vs. 9.1 ± 4.3, P= 0.0011). At 36 weeks, diabetic patients experienced similar per cent reduction in ESV overall (-4.9 ± 17.9 vs. -5.5 ± 16.9, P= 0.67) but tended to experience greater reduction in ESV than non-diabetic patients when treated with aliskiren (interaction P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with non-diabetic patients, diabetic patients are at increased risk of CV events post-MI despite no greater LV enlargement or reduction in systolic function. Diabetic patients demonstrate greater concentric remodelling and evidence of higher LV filling pressure, suggesting diastolic dysfunction as a potential mechanism for the higher risk observed among these patients.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aliskiren monotherapy administered with a light meal in elderly hypertensive patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response evaluation study.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aliskiren 75, 150, and 300 mg to clarify the dose-response relationship and characterize the optimum aliskiren dose when given with a light meal to elderly hypertensive patients. After washout, 754 patients aged ≥65 years with hypertension (mean sitting systolic blood pressure [msSBP] ≥150 and <180 mm Hg; mean sitting diastolic blood pressure [msDBP] <110 mm Hg) were randomized to aliskiren 75, 150, or 300 mg or placebo for 8 weeks; medication was taken each morning with a light meal. The primary efficacy variable was change in msSBP from baseline to week 8 end point. Change from baseline in msDBP and dose-response curves for aliskiren 75, 150, and 300 mg were also assessed. At week 8 end point, all 3 aliskiren doses provided significantly greater least squares mean reductions in msSBP/msDBP (75 mg, 13/5 mm Hg; 150 mg, 15/6 mm Hg; 300 mg, 14/7 mm Hg) compared with placebo (8/4 mm Hg; P < .05). Aliskiren was generally well tolerated at all doses. There was a significant dose-response relationship for aliskiren, with an estimated minimum effective dose of 81.9 mg. In conclusion, aliskiren 150 and 300 mg provided effective blood pressure control in elderly patients when given with a light meal.

Efficacy and safety of aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor, compared with ramipril in Asian patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

This 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and safety of aliskiren with ramipril in Asian patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Following a 2- to 3-week placebo run-in period, patients with mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) ≥95 and <110 mm Hg were randomized to receive once daily dose of either aliskiren 75, 150, 300 mg or ramipril 5 mg for 8 weeks. Efficacy variables were the changes in msDBP and mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) and BP control rates (<140/90 mm Hg). Safety was assessed by recording adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Of 1316 randomized patients, 1160 (88.1%) completed the study. At the study endpoint, patients on aliskiren had greater mean BP reductions (14.39/11.63 mm Hg for 300 mg; 12.16/10.04 mm Hg for 150 mg; 12.24/10.66 mm Hg for 75 mg) than those on 5 mg ramipril (11.46/9.19 mm Hg). All aliskiren doses were statistically non-inferior (P<0.0001) to ramipril in reducing msDBP. The reduction in BP for aliskiren 300 mg was statistically superior vs. ramipril (P<0.002). Blood pressure control rates were higher for aliskiren (300 mg, 52.29%; 150 mg, 48.11%; 75 mg, 45.68%) than for ramipril (5 mg, 43.7%); the difference for aliskiren 300 mg vs. ramipril 5 mg was statistically significant (P<0.05). Aliskiren was well tolerated with a fourfold lower incidence of cough (0.6-1.2%) compared with ramipril (5.2%). SAEs were rare in this study (0.5%). Aliskiren produced greater BP reductions with a lower incidence of cough than ramipril in Asian patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Comparison of aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy and amlodipine monotherapy in patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Patients with stage 2 hypertension and diabetes are at high cardiovascular risk and require large blood pressure (BP) reductions to reach treatment goals. This randomized double-blind study compared aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination therapy with amlodipine monotherapy in 860 patients with mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) ≥160 mm Hg to <200 mm Hg and type 2 diabetes. Patients received either once-daily aliskiren/HCTZ 150/12.5 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for 1 week then force-titrated to double the doses for 7 weeks. Baseline BP was 167.7/91.4 mm Hg. At week 8 end point, aliskiren/HCTZ provided significantly greater reductions in msSBP than amlodipine (28.8 mm Hg vs 26.2 mm Hg; P<.05). Mean sitting diastolic BP reductions were similar with aliskiren/HCTZ (9.9 mm Hg) and amlodipine (9.0 mm Hg). Achievement of BP control (<130/80 mm Hg) was significantly greater with aliskiren/HCTZ (23.2%) than amlodipine (13.8%; P<.0001). Aliskiren/HCTZ provides substantial msSBP reductions and greater BP control rates than amlodipine, and offers an attractive treatment option for patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus.

Long-term safety and tolerability of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren with optional add-on hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension: a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, dose-escalation study with an extension phase.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with hypertension will require combination therapy with at least two agents from different antihypertensive classes to achieve blood pressure (BP) control. Thiazide diuretics, such as hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), are widely used in combination therapy. The volume reduction with these agents stimulates the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), making RAS inhibitors such as the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren a logical choice for combination therapy with HCTZ. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren, with or without addition of the diuretic HCTZ. METHODS: In the 12-month core study, patients with hypertension (mean sitting diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg and <110 mmHg) were randomized in a 3 : 2 ratio to once-daily aliskiren 150 mg or 300 mg. At months 2, 3, 4, 6 and 9, treatment was adjusted in patients not achieving a BP goal of <140/90 mmHg. Patients not at goal on aliskiren 150 mg once daily were up-titrated to aliskiren 300 mg once daily. Patients not at goal with aliskiren 300 mg once daily received add-on HCTZ 12.5 mg once daily, which was up-titrated to 25 mg once daily if BP remained inadequately controlled. At month 12, patients who received aliskiren/HCTZ 300 mg/25 mg once daily for at least 8 months in the core study were eligible to enter a 4-month extension study. RESULTS: Overall, 1625/1955 patients completed the core study, and 870/1955 patients received add-on HCTZ; 189/198 patients completed the 4-month extension. Aliskiren, with or without add-on HCTZ, was generally well tolerated; the incidence of adverse events (AEs) during the core study was similar among the four final treatment groups. The most frequently reported AEs in the core and extension studies were mild and transient cases of nasopharyngitis, headache and dizziness. Few patients exhibited laboratory abnormalities. Overall, aliskiren, with or without add-on HCTZ, reduced mean BP by 18.0/12.7 mmHg at core study endpoint, and 61.2% of patients achieved BP control. BP reductions with aliskiren/HCTZ 300 mg/25 mg combination therapy at the core study endpoint were maintained during the extension study. CONCLUSION: In patients with hypertension, long-term treatment with aliskiren, with or without add-on HCTZ, is well tolerated and provides effective BP lowering that is sustained over 12 months.

Safety and tolerability of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren in combination with angiotensin receptor blockers and thiazide diuretics: a pooled analysis of clinical experience of 12,942 patients.

Combinations of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or diuretics are effective therapeutic regimens for the treatment of hypertension. A large database of safety information has become available during the past several years with aliskiren in combination trials. Data were pooled from 9 short-term (8-week) and 4 longer-term (26- to 52-week) randomized controlled trials of aliskiren in patients with hypertension. Adverse event (AE) rates were assessed for aliskiren combination therapy compared with component monotherapies. In short-term studies, overall AE rates were similar for patients receiving aliskiren/valsartan or aliskiren/diuretic combinations (32.2%-39.8%) and those receiving the component monotherapies (30.0%-39.6%). In longer-term studies, AE rates with aliskiren/losartan (55.5%) and aliskiren/diuretic (45.0%) combination therapy were similar to those with losartan (53.9%) and diuretic (48.9%) alone. Angioedema and hyperkalemia occurred in similar proportions of patients taking combination therapies vs monotherapy. The safety and tolerability profile of aliskiren in combination with the ARBs valsartan or losartan, or diuretic, is similar to aliskiren, ARBs, or diuretics alone.