Employment after liver transplantation: a review.

BACKGROUND: Return to productive employment is often an important milestone in the recovery and rehabilitation process after liver transplantation (OLT). This literature review identifies factors associated with employment in patients who underwent OLT. METHODS: We searched PubMed for articles that addressed the various factors affecting employment after OLT. RESULTS: The studies demonstrated improvement in the quality of life and examined factors that predicted whether patients would return to work after OLT. Demographic variable associated with posttransplant employment included young age, male sex, college degree, Caucasian race, and pretransplant employment. Patients with alcohol-related liver disease had a significantly lower rate of employment than did those with other etiologies of liver disease. Recipients who were employed after transplantation had a significantly better posttransplant functional status than did those who were not employed. CONCLUSION: Economic pressures are increasing the expectation that patients who undergo successful OLT will return to work. Thus, transplant teams need to have a better understanding of posttransplant work outcomes for this vulnerable population, and greater attention must be paid to the full social rehabilitation of transplant recipients. Specific interventions for OLT recipients should be designed to evaluate and change their health perceptions and encourage their return to work.

Prospective study of risk factors for hepatitis C virus acquisition by Caucasian, Hispanic, and Asian American patients.

Commonly known risk factors for infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) include blood transfusion, injection drug use, intranasal cocaine use, and body tattoos. We hypothesized that Asian Americans infected with HCV may not identify with these established risk factors present in Caucasians and Hispanics, and our aim was to conduct a survey of risk factors in HCV-infected patients in these ethnic groups. In this prospective study, 494 patients infected with HCV completed a detailed risk assessment questionnaire at a liver centre in Northern California from 2001 to 2008. Among subjects participating in this study, 55% identified themselves as Caucasian, 20% as Hispanic, and 25% as Asian. Asian Americans were older, less likely to smoke or consume alcohol, and have a family history of cancer compared with Caucasians and Hispanics. The laboratory profiles were similar, and genotype 1 was the most common infection in all groups (74-75%). The great majority of Caucasians (94%) and Hispanics (86%) identified with commonly known risk factors, which was in contrast to 67% of Asians (P < 0.0001). The most common risk factors in Asians were blood transfusions (50%) and acupuncture (50%). Furthermore, 74% of Caucasians and 66% of Hispanics identified more than one major risk factor, while only 20% of Asians reported having more than one risk factor (P < 0.0001). Survey for established risk factors for acquisition of HCV may be more appropriate for risk assessment of Caucasians and Hispanics, but not for Asian Americans. These findings may guide the development of HCV screening in our increasingly diverse population.

Risk assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B: scores and surveillance.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death (1). Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major risk factor for HCC, accounting for more than one half of cases worldwide (2). Early detection of HCC in populations with chronic HBV infection through surveillance methods is critically important in providing definitive treatment for HCC and has a major impact on patient outcomes (3), including a survival benefit as demonstrated in one prospective randomised controlled trial (4). Efforts to identify populations and individuals with HBV infection who are at high risk may contribute to the development of surveillance strategies with the greatest impact on patient outcomes; however, the implementation of an individualised approach to surveillance can be challenging. This Perspective aims to explore risk factors associated with HCC in patients with chronic HBV infection, recent data on developing scoring systems to assess risk, and how these may impact surveillance strategies.

Review article: current antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: The indications and endpoints for treatment of chronic hepatitis B continue to evolve. The aim of the therapy for chronic hepatitis B is to achieve a long-term continued suppression of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to prevent disease progression leading to the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. AIM: To summarise current literature on therapy of chronic hepatitis B, with a focus on indications for therapy, preferred treatment options, and management of resistance and partial responders. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature, with a focus on international guidelines, was performed. RESULTS: Seven drugs are licensed for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in many countries. The selection of a drug with high potency and low rate of resistance is essential to achieve rapid and long-term viral suppression. The prevention of the sequelae of antiviral drug resistance and appropriate management of viral breakthrough are major goals of current management. The addition or change to an antiviral agent that is not cross-resistant is critical to restore suppression of viral replication for patients with breakthrough resistance. Patient adherence to medication is essential to achieve adequate HBV DNA suppression. CONCLUSIONS: The current treatment strategy of chronic hepatitis B is now standard: initial selection of entecavir, tenofovir, or peginterferon alfa-2a. Future studies are required to determine if combination therapy using two oral agents or peginterferon with an oral agent with a high genetic barrier to resistance might be superior to standard current monotherapy.

Impact of virologic breakthrough and HBIG regimen on hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation.

The availability of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and several oral antiviral therapies has reduced but not eliminated hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence. We aimed to determine the rate of HBV recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in relation to virologic breakthrough pre-OLT and HBIG regimens post-OLT. Data from the NIH HBV-OLT database were analyzed. A total of 183 patients transplanted between 2001 and 2007 followed for a median of 42 months (range 1-81) post-OLT were studied. At transplant, 29% were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) (+), 38.5% had HBV DNA > 5 log(10) copies/mL, 74% were receiving antiviral therapy. Twenty-five patients experienced virologic breakthrough before OLT. Post-OLT, 26%, 22%, 40% and 12% of patients received intravenous (IV) high-dose, IV low-dose, intramuscular low-dose and a finite duration of HBIG, respectively as maintenance prophylaxis. All but two patients also received antiviral therapy. Cumulative rates of HBV recurrence at 1 and 5 years were 3% and 9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that listing HBeAg status and HBV DNA level at OLT were the only factors associated with HBV recurrence. In conclusion, low rates of HBV recurrence can be accomplished with all the HBIG regimens used when combined with antiviral therapy including patients with breakthrough pre-OLT as long as rescue therapy is administered pre- and post-OLT.

Transarterial chemoinfusion for hepatocellular carcinoma as downstaging therapy and a bridge toward liver transplantation.

Favorable outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are well described for patients who fall within defined tumor criteria. The effectiveness of tumor therapies to maintain tumor characteristics within these criteria or to downstage more advanced tumors to fall within these criteria is not well understood. The aim of this study was to examine the response to transcatheter arterial chemoinfusion (TACI) in HCC patients awaiting LT and its efficacy for downstaging or bridging to transplantation. We performed a retrospective study of 248 consecutive TACI cases in 122 HCC patients at a single U.S. medical center. Patients were divided into two groups: those who met the Milan criteria on initial HCC diagnosis (n = 95) and those with more advanced disease (n = 27). With TACI treatment, 87% of the Milan criteria group remained within the Milan criteria and 63% of patients with more advanced disease were successfully downstaged to fall within the Milan criteria. In conclusion, TACI appears to be an effective treatment as a bridge to LT for nearly 90% patients presenting within the Milan criteria and an effective downstaging modality for over half of those whose tumor burden was initially beyond the Milan criteria.

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: 2009 update.

The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is made using a combination of serological, virologic, biochemical, and histologic markers. The natural history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can be divided into four phases: immune tolerance, immune clearance (HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B), inactive HBsAg carrier, and reactivation (HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B). Patients in the immune clearance and reactivation phases, with elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV DNA levels, are candidates for antiviral therapy. The primary determinant of treatment outcomes for CHB is suppression of serum HBV DNA, and long-term suppression of viral replication is likely to reduce progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Current antiviral treatment options for CHB include interferon alfa-2b, peginterferon alfa-2a, lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, telbivudine, and tenofovir. In patients with HBeAg-positive CHB, antiviral treatment is indicated when the serum HBV DNA level is 20 000 IU/mL and the ALT level is elevated. For HBeAg-negative patients, the threshold for initiation of therapy is lower, i.e., a serum HBV DNA level 2 000 IU/mL in association with an elevated ALT level. The presence of at least moderate necroinflammation and the presence of fibrosis on liver biopsy may be useful in supporting the decision to initiate therapy, particularly in patients with normal ALT levels. While undergoing therapy, patients require monitoring every 3 to 6 months to ensure adherence to therapy, confirm that the response to therapy is optimal, and survey for the development of resistance if an oral agent is used. Issues that remain controversial or need to be studied further are the necessity of a baseline liver biopsy, the HBV DNA and ALT thresholds for initiation of therapy, the optimal duration of antiviral therapy, selection of one agent over another, response to suboptimal suppression of viral replication, and the role of combination therapy.

Chronic hepatitis B: early viral suppression and long-term outcomes of therapy with oral nucleos(t)ides.

SUMMARY: Chronic hepatitis B is a serious health problem worldwide with a substantial minority of patients experiencing premature death due to end-stage liver disease and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. Antiviral therapy may help prevent complications of chronic hepatitis B, and seven agents are currently approved in many countries. Of these agents, five are nucleos(t)ide analogs that all have a risk of antiviral drug resistance with long-term use. Efforts have been made in the recent years to prevent or to reduce the risk of viral resistance in patients treated with oral nucleos(t)ides as the majority of these patients will require therapy for 3-5 years or longer. One approach is to identify patients who would most likely develop antiviral resistance on long-term therapy using predictors obtainable early in the course of treatment, when intervention with new or additional therapy can be instituted. The most important predictors of treatment outcomes are serum HBV DNA levels at baseline and during the first 6 months of therapy. The purpose of this synopsis is to review the recent literature regarding the importance of serum HBV DNA levels in association with treatment outcomes in chronic hepatitis B, particularly the association of complete viral suppression early in the course of oral therapy with long-term treatment outcomes, particularly the incidence of antiviral drug resistance.

Clinical course of hepatitis B virus infection during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: For women with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, little is known about the natural progression of the disease during pregnancy or its impact on pregnancy outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the natural progression of HBV infection during pregnancy or its impact on pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed medical records of all patients who were pregnant and presented with HBsAg-positivity between 2000 and 2008 at a community gastroenterology practice and a university hepatology clinic. Maternal characteristics were analysed according to maternal and perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 29 cases with at least 2 measurements of either HBV DNA or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were included. Older age was the only predictor of a trend towards higher risk of an adverse clinical outcome [OR = 1.21 (0.97-1.51), P = 0.089], defined as either a negative foetal outcome (premature delivery, spontaneous abortion), or a negative maternal outcomes (gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-eclampsia, hepatic flare, liver failure). This trend for age remained even after adjusting for baseline ALT. Baseline serum HBV DNA, ALT, hepatitis B e antigen status, gravida and parity were not significant predictors for adverse clinical outcomes. Four patients developed liver failure. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal and neonatal outcomes are highly variable in this clinic-based patient cohort. Severe complications due to HBV infection can occur during pregnancy in previously asymptomatic patients. It is unclear how generalizable the results observed in this cohort would be to the general population; therefore, further studies are needed to identify reliable predictors for significant adverse outcomes and until more data are available, pregnant patients with HBV infection should be monitored with periodic serum HBV DNA and ALT levels.

Alanine aminotransferase levels are not significantly elevated in patients with HIV/HBV co-infection and lamivudine resistance.

In hepatitis B virus (HBV) monoinfection, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels are linearly correlated with HBV DNA levels and lamivudine resistance. In human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HBV co-infection, little is known about the association between ALT, HBV DNA, and lamivudine resistance. We assessed HBV DNA, lamivudine resistance and ALT levels in 45 time points in 11 patients with HIV/HBV co-infection during lamivudine-containing antiretroviral therapy. High HBV DNA levels (>10(6) copies/mL) and lamivudine resistance developed in 45% and 91% of patients, respectively. However, ALT levels were not elevated in the setting of high HBV DNA levels (mean ALT, 48 IU/mL) or lamivudine resistance (mean ALT, 44 IU/mL). HBV viraemia and lamivudine resistance during extended lamivudine-containing antiretroviral therapy are common in HIV/HBV co-infection, occurring in the absence of significant ALT elevations. In HIV/HBV co-infection, measurement of HBV DNA and HBV resistance mutations may identify HBV virological failure before biochemical changes and should be routinely used in the management of HIV/HBV co-infection.

Clinical trial: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of nitazoxanide monotherapy for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4.

BACKGROUND: Nitazoxanide, licensed in the US for treatment of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia, inhibits hepatitis C virus replication in replicon systems. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of nitazoxanide monotherapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized 50 adult patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 at three centres in Egypt to nitazoxanide 500 mg tablet or placebo twice daily for 24 weeks. Patients were followed up every 4 weeks during treatment and for 24 weeks after therapy. RESULTS: Seven of 23 patients (30.4%) in the nitazoxanide group achieved undetectable serum HCV RNA compared to 0 of 24 in the placebo group during therapy (P = 0.004). Each of the seven responders had baseline HCV RNA levels < or =400 000 IU/mL. Six of the seven virological responders were followed up for 24 weeks after the end of treatment, and four patients (17.4% of 23 treated) had a sustained virological response. Adverse events were similar in the nitazoxanide and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Nitazoxanide monotherapy is safe and effective in achieving sustained virological response in a modest number of patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4, particularly in patients with low baseline serum HCV RNA levels.

Review article: current antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: The long-term goals of therapy for chronic hepatitis B are to reduce serum HBV DNA to low or undetectable levels and ultimately reduce or prevent the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. AIM: To review the current treatment of chronic hepatitis B, with a focus on diagnosis and management of resistance and active management of suboptimal responses. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature, with a focus on recent guidelines, was undertaken. RESULTS: Among the six drugs licensed for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in the US, the preferred agents in 2008 will include entecavir, peginterferon alfa-2a, possibly telbivudine, and tenofovir following licensure. When using an oral agent, a major focus of management is on the selection of a drug with high potency and low rate of resistance, and active on-treatment management to optimize therapy. Preventing the sequelae of antiviral drug resistance and appropriate management when resistance is initially detected are also the major focus of current management. The addition of an antiviral agent that is not cross-resistant is critical to restore suppression of viral replication. CONCLUSIONS: Newer agents and modified treatment strategies, especially using combination therapy, hold promise to optimize the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B by achieving the high potency and the lowest rate of resistance.

Long-term survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transcatheter arterial chemoinfusion.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has become one of the most common treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Published studies of TACE report a 5-16% risk of serious complications. Compared with TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoinfusion (TACI) may have similar efficacy and fewer side effects. AIM: To examine the clinical outcomes of TACI. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 345 consecutive TACI cases in 165 patients performed at a single United States medical center between 1998 and 2002. Primary outcomes were tumour response and survival rates. RESULTS: Only seven patients were hospitalized for more than 24 h after the procedure, and only three patients had worsening of liver function within 30 days of TACI. Survival was significantly poorer for patients with tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) IV compared to those with TNM I-III and also for patients with Child's class B/C vs. A. Following adjustment for age, gender, ethnicity and aetiology of liver diseases, independent predictors of poor survival were Child's class B/C [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.69, P = 0.024] and TNM IV staging (HR = 1.63, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: TACI appears to be safe and effective for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with TNM stage I-III; randomized controlled trials are needed to compare TACI to TACE.

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: an update.

The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is made using a combination of serological, virologic, biochemical, and histologic markers. The natural history of HBV infection can be divided into four phases: immune tolerance, immune clearance (HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B), inactive HBsAg carrier, and reactivation (HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B). Patients in the immune clearance and reactivation phases, with elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV DNA levels, are candidates for antiviral therapy. The primary goal of therapy for chronic hepatitis B is suppression of viral replication, which has been shown to reduce hepatic necroinflammation and retard progression of hepatic fibrosis. Long-term suppression of serum HBV DNA is likely to reduce progression to cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation and decrease the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B includes interferon alfa, peginterferon alfa-2a, lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and telbivudine. In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, antiviral treatment is indicated when the serum HBV DNA level is = or > 10(5) copies/mL (20,000 IU/mL) and the ALT level is elevated. For HBeAg-negative patients, the threshold for initiation of therapy is lower, i.e., a serum HBV DNA level = or > 10(4) copies/mL (2,000 IU/mL) in association with an elevated ALT level. The presence of at least moderate necroinflammation and the presence of fibrosis on liver biopsy, which is optional and not mandatory before therapy, may be useful in supporting the decision to initiate therapy, particularly in patients with normal ALT levels. While undergoing therapy, patients require monitoring every 3 to 6 months to ensure compliance and to test for the development of resistance if an oral agent is used. Issues that remain controversial or need to be studied further are the necessity of a baseline liver biopsy, the HBV DNA and ALT thresholds for initiation of therapy, the optimal duration of antiviral therapy, selection of one agent over another, and the role of combination therapy.

Systematic review: lamivudine prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

BACKGROUND: Reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection in asymptomatic hepatitis B surface antigen carriers undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy is a well-documented and potentially fatal complication. Data supporting the use of lamivudine for primary prophylaxis have emerged, but its use remains controversial and is not standardized. AIM: To review current randomized-controlled trials, randomized trials and prospective case series to provide a clinically applicable, evidence-based recommendation. METHODS: The published literature was identified using a MEDLINE/PubMed search with secondary review of cited publications, and inclusion of all prospective studies. RESULTS: In nine prospective trials and one randomized-controlled trial, the rate of hepatitis among subjects receiving lamivudine prophylaxis ranged from 0% to 20% (16 of 173, 9.2%), compared with 33-67% among controls. Of patients receiving prophylaxis, 0-24% (15 of 173, 8.7%) developed hepatitis B virus reactivation, compared with 29-56% of controls. Three reactivation-related mortalities were reported (one receiving prophylaxis, two controls). No patients withdrew secondary to toxicity or development of lamivudine-resistant mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The available data show a four- to sevenfold decrease in the rate of hepatitis and hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients who receive lamivudine prophylaxis. It is thus recommended that all hepatitis B surface antigen carriers receive lamivudine, or a comparable anti-viral agent, as prophylaxis from the initiation of chemotherapy until at least 1 year following its completion.

Cost-effectiveness of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients using abdominal ultrasonography and alpha-foetoprotein levels is widely practiced. AIM: To evaluate its cost-effectiveness using a Markov decision model. METHODS: Several screening strategies with abdominal ultrasonography or computerized tomography and serum alpha-foetoprotein at 6-12-month intervals in 40-year-old patients with chronic hepatitis C and compensated cirrhosis were simulated from a societal perspective, resulting in discounted costs per quality-adjusted life-year saved. Extensive sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: For the least efficacious strategy, annual alpha-foetoprotein/ultrasonography, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (vs. no screening) was $23 043/quality-adjusted life-year. Biannual alpha-foetoprotein/annual ultrasonography, the most commonly used strategy in the United States, was more efficacious, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of $33 083/quality-adjusted life-year vs. annual alpha-foetoprotein/ultrasonography. The most efficacious strategy, biannual alpha-foetoprotein/ultrasonography, resulted in a cost-effectiveness ratio of $73 789/quality-adjusted life-year vs. biannual alpha-foetoprotein/annual ultrasonography. Biannual alpha-foetoprotein/annual computerized tomography screening resulted in a cost-effectiveness ratio of $51 750/quality-adjusted life-year vs. biannual alpha-foetoprotein/annual ultrasonography screening. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma is as cost-effective as other accepted screening protocols. Of the strategies evaluated, biannual alpha-foetoprotein/annual ultrasonography gives the most quality-adjusted life-year gain while still maintaining a cost-effectiveness ratio <$50 000/quality-adjusted life-year. Biannual alpha-foetoprotein/annual computerized tomography screening may be cost-effective.

Review article: hepatitis vaccination in patients with chronic liver disease.

Evidence regarding the outcomes of viral super-infection in patients with chronic liver disease and practical strategies for hepatitis A and B vaccination of these individuals are reviewed. Patients with acute hepatitis A and chronic hepatitis B have a more severe clinical course and a higher death rate compared with otherwise healthy individuals with hepatitis A, and these differences are most pronounced in older patients and those with histological evidence of chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, rather than in asymptomatic hepatitis B carriers. Patients with acute hepatitis A super-infection and chronic hepatitis C have an increased risk of fulminant hepatitis and death. In addition, patients with other chronic liver diseases also appear to be at increased risk for more severe disease with superimposed hepatitis A. Patients with chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus co-infection have more severe laboratory abnormalities, more severe histological disease, a greater frequency of cirrhosis and complications of cirrhosis, and a higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Vaccines for both hepatitis A and B are safe and effective if used early in the course of chronic liver disease. Hepatitis A and B vaccination should be part of the routine management of patients with chronic liver disease, preferably as early as possible in the natural course of their disease.

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis B.

The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is made using a combination of serological, virological, biochemical, and histological markers. The natural history of HBV infection can be divided into 3 phases: immune tolerant, immune active with chronic hepatitis B, and inactive carrier; patients in the immune active phase are candidates for antiviral therapy. The primary goal of therapy for chronic hepatitis B is suppression of viral replication, which has been shown to reduce hepatic necroinflammation and retard progression of hepatic fibrosis. Long-term suppression of serum HBV DNA is likely to reduce progression to cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation and may also decrease the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B includes interferon alpha, lamivudine and adefovir, with recent studies demonstrating good safety and efficacy of peginterferon and other nucleoside analogues that will soon become additional treatment options. In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, antiviral treatment is indicated when the serum HBV DNA level is = or >10(5) copies/mL and the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level is elevated, particularly greater than 2 times the upper limits of normal. For HBeAg-negative patients, the threshold for initiation of therapy is a HBV DNA level = or >10(4) in association with an elevated ALT level. The presence of at least moderate necroinflammation and the presence of fibrosis on liver biopsy, which is optional and not mandatory before therapy, may be useful in supporting the decision to initiate therapy. While undergoing therapy, patients require monitoring every 3 to 6 months to ensure compliance and to test for the development of resistance if an oral agent is used. Issues that remain controversial or need to be studied further are the necessity of a baseline liver biopsy, the HBV DNA and ALT thresholds for initiation of therapy, the optimal duration of antiviral therapy, selection of one agent over another, and the role of combination therapy.

Patient selection criteria for liver transplantation.

The demand for liver transplantation has progressively increased in the setting of a relatively fixed cadaveric organ supply over the past 5 years. An increasing percentage of listed patients are dying waiting for an organ, with additional listed candidates being disqualified as they became too sick for transplantation. This disparity between organ demand and supply has led to continued reassessment of selection and listing criteria for transplantation as well as periodic revisions of allocation and distribution policies for cadaveric livers. The minimal listing criteria adopted in the United States in the late 1990s initially served to prevent inappropriate organ allocation to patients who had risen to high priority for a donor organ simply because they had been listed early and had a longer total waiting time. Many of these patients had lesser disease severity and immediate need for transplantation than other patients competing for the same donor organ but listed later in the natural history of their end-stage liver disease. The United Network for Organ Sharing has continuously revised organ allocation and distribution policies in an attempt to balance the ethical principles of medical justice and utility, which potentially conflict with one another. The principle of justice advocates for the sickest patient who has been waiting for the longest time, whereas that of utility favors the patient with the highest likelihood of achieving successful outcome. Throughout all of the changes in organ allocation rules, patients with fulminant hepatic failure have continued to receive the highest priority for organs. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has replaced the Child-Turcotte- Pugh system for assessing disease severity and predicted mortality in patients with chronic liver failure. However, the use of MELD has favored listed candidates who have the worst post-transplant survivals. Other options that are being explored to expand the donor pool include the use of marginal donors, split liver transplants, living donors, and domino transplants, with xenotransplantation still remaining experimental.

Systematic review: peginterferon vs. standard interferon in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials over the last decade have demonstrated incremental improvement in the treatment efficacy of chronic hepatitis C with combination interferon and ribavirin therapy when compared with interferon monotherapy. AIM: To perform a systematic review of clinical trials directly comparing interferon formulations to test the hypothesis that a true difference in terms of efficacy exists between standard interferon (with and without ribavirin) and peginterferon (with and without ribavirin). METHODS: A search of the on-line bibliographic databases MEDLINE and PUBMED was performed independently by two authors to identify all relevant articles. In addition, the reference sections of all relevant articles were manually searched to identify any missed articles. Quality was assessed using the Jadad scale, which is an accepted scale specific for randomized controlled trials. A priori, it was decided to include only articles with a Jadad score of three or higher in the final analysis. Data were abstracted on to pre-determined abstraction sheets. The inclusion of articles, the data abstracted and the methodological score differences were adjudicated by consensus with agreement of the authors performing the search. RESULTS: Seven citations of randomized controlled trials, comparing at least two different interferon formulations and evaluating the sustained virological response as a primary end-point, were identified. These relevant articles were abstracted, and five of the seven were found to have a Jadad score of three or higher and comprised the final set of citations reviewed. The studies consistently demonstrated that peginterferon monotherapy was superior to standard interferon, even in patients with advanced fibrosis. With regard to combination interferon therapy, only two high-quality articles compared peginterferon plus ribavirin with standard interferon plus ribavirin. Both studies demonstrated that the overall sustained virological response was statistically better with peginterferon plus ribavirin. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this systematic review, peginterferon-based regimens are superior to standard interferon-based regimens for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.