Work-related musculoskeletal pain and discomfort in laparoscopic surgeons: an international multispecialty survey.

INTRODUCTION: As laparoscopic surgery is used more widely across the globe and within multiple surgical specialties the potential impact on surgeons is yet to be fully quantified. Maintenance of uncomfortable body positions may lead to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) in surgeons, with potential knock-on effects. METHODS: An international open online survey of multispecialty laparoscopic surgeons was carried out, designed and reported in accordance with the CHERRIES checklist for internet e-survey research. There was no paid advertising and no incentives offered. RESULTS: A total of 259 surgeons from 9 specialties and 32 countries answered the survey, with 90% reporting pain attributable to performing laparoscopic surgery. All training grades were represented. Longer average operative duration and a greater number of years in practice were both associated with a significantly higher prevalence of pain. Surgeons with a pre-existing injury were significantly more likely to report pain than those without. Twenty per cent of surgeons would consider early retirement owing to pain. CONCLUSIONS: The impact on surgeons of performing laparoscopic surgery is significant, even given the limitations of an open survey. Innovations such as robotic surgery and improved ergonomic education may reduce the incidence of WMSD in surgeons, to mitigate both the personal effects on surgeons and the wider effect on the future surgical workforce.

A systematic review of point-of-care abdominal ultrasound scans performed by general surgeons in paediatric patients.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Bedside point-of-care ultrasound scans are a cheap, quick and safe diagnostic tool. There is increasing evidence for the use of point-of-care surgeon-performed ultrasound scans in adults, however there are fewer studies of its use in children. This systematic review aims to provide an up-to-date summary of the evidence behind surgeon-performed ultrasound scans in paediatric surgery. METHODS: The PubMed database was used to conduct this systematic review between the dates 1 Jan 1980 to 1 June 2020 (last search: 1 June 2020). Seven primary research studies were included in this review. RESULTS: There is good evidence for the use of ultrasound scans in appendicitis and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Training times are easily achievable and transferable within a surgical department. CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of surgeon-performed bedside ultrasound scans has been described in appendicitis and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, more research is required to embed this into clinical practice, particularly in low volume centres such as district general hospitals. A robust training programme is also recommended to incorporate ultrasound scans into clinical practice.

A systematic review of point-of-care abdominal ultrasound scans performed by general surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is an established imaging modality in general surgery. With the increasing use of bedside point-of-care ultrasounds, general surgeons have been incorporating this skill into their clinical practice. This systematic review provides an up-to-date summary of the evidence for abdominal ultrasound scans performed by general surgeons to diagnose intra-abdominal pathology. METHODS: Two independent reviewers searched the PubMed database between 1 January 1980 and 1 June 2020. Articles about surgeon-performed abdominal ultrasound in adult patients were included. Studies on trauma and vascular surgery were excluded. RESULTS: 26 articles met the inclusion criteria, presented as a narrative analysis. There was good evidence for the use of surgeon-performed ultrasound, particularly in gallstone-related diseases and moderate evidence for the use of ultrasound in appendicitis. Further evidence is required for point-of-care ultrasounds for other pathologies such as diverticulitis and groin hernias. Ultrasound training for general surgeons is variable with notable heterogeneity across studies. CONCLUSION: A standardised training programme for general surgeons will greatly improve confidence and skill. There is good evidence for the use of bedside ultrasound by general surgeons in the acute and elective setting with reduced time to definitive treatment and fewer unnecessary hospital admissions.

Major colorectal resection is feasible using a new robotic surgical platform: the first report of a case series.

BACKGROUND: The number of abdominal procedures performed via a robotic-assisted approach is increasing as potential advantages of the modality are recognised. We report the first in human case series of major colorectal resection performed using a new system, Versius®, and assess the feasibility of its use. METHODS: The initial cases performed using Versius® at a single centre in the UK were included in the study. Anonymised data were prospectively collected including patient demographics, operative details and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-three operations were performed, including left (n = 14) and right (n = 9)-sided colonic resections. Rectal mobilisation was performed in 13. Fifty-seven percent of the patients were male, with a malignant indication for surgery in 70% of cases. Overall mean age was 59.1 ± 15.3 (range 23-89) years. Overall mean body mass index was 28.9 ± 5.2 with a mean of 31.3 ± 4.5 for left-sided resections. The median console operating time was 166 min (range 75-320 min). All malignant cases had negative resection margins and the mean lymph node yield was 18 (SD 9.4). Only one operation (4%) was converted from robotic to open approach. Postoperative length of stay was a median of 5 days (range 3-34 days) and there were no readmissions within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: These results compare favourably with the literature on existing robotic systems and also conventional laparoscopic surgery; hence, we believe that this series indicates the Versius® system is feasible for use in major colorectal resection. These early results from a robot-naïve centre show exciting promise for an expanding robotic market and highlight the need for further evaluation.

Preoperative intravenous iron therapy and survival after colorectal cancer surgery: long-term results from the IVICA randomised controlled trial.

AIM: Preoperative iron is frequently used for the correction of anaemia in colorectal cancer surgery. However, enteral iron intake may promote tumour growth and progression which could influence cancer recurrence and patient survival. We explore the long-term outcomes of patients receiving either oral or intravenous iron replacement therapy as part of a previous randomized controlled trial. METHODS: The IVICA trial randomized anaemic colorectal cancer patients to receive either oral (OI, control) or intravenous (IVI, treatment) iron prior to their elective operation. Follow-up analysis of all patients recruited to this multicentre trial who underwent surgical resection with curative intent was performed. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare groups. A pooled group multivariable analysis comparing patients who achieved resolution of anaemia preoperatively to those who did not was also undertaken. RESULTS: In all, 110 of the 116 patients previously enrolled were eligible for analysis (OI n = 56, IVI n = 54). Median overall follow-up duration was 61 months (interquartile range 46-67). No significant difference in 5-year overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.22, 95% CI 0.65-2.28, P = 0.522) or disease-free survival (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.61-1.92, P = 0.79) was observed between OI and IVI. A pooled analysis of treatment groups found that preoperative resolution of anaemia led to improved 5-year overall survival on multivariable analysis (HR 3.38, 95% CI 1.07-11.56, P = 0.044). CONCLUSION: We recommend IVI for the preoperative correction of anaemia. Route of iron therapy did not significantly influence survival. Preoperative anaemia correction may lead to an overall survival advantage following elective colorectal cancer surgery.

The impact of pre-operative intravenous iron on quality of life after colorectal cancer surgery: outcomes from the intravenous iron in colorectal cancer-associated anaemia (IVICA) trial.

Anaemia is associated with a reduction in quality of life, and is common in patients with colorectal cancer . We recently reported the findings of the intravenous iron in colorectal cancer-associated anaemia (IVICA) trial comparing haemoglobin levels and transfusion requirements following intravenous or oral iron replacement in anaemic colorectal cancer patients undergoing elective surgery. In this follow-up study, we compared the efficacy of intravenous and oral iron at improving quality of life in this patient group. We conducted a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Anaemic colorectal cancer patients were randomly allocated at least two weeks pre-operatively, to receive either oral (ferrous sulphate) or intravenous (ferric carboxymaltose) iron. We assessed haemoglobin and quality of life scores at recruitment, immediately before surgery and at outpatient review approximately three months postoperatively, using the Short Form 36, EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia questionnaires. We recruited 116 anaemic patients across seven UK centres (oral iron n = 61 (53%), and intravenous iron n = 55 (47%)). Eleven quality of life components increased by a clinically significant margin in the intravenous iron group between recruitment and surgery compared with one component for oral iron. Median (IQR [range]) visual analogue scores were significantly higher with intravenous iron at a three month outpatient review (oral iron 70, (60-85 [20-95]); intravenous iron 90 (80-90 [50-100]), p = 0.001). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia score comprises of subscales related to cancer, fatigue and non-fatigue items relevant to anaemia. Median outpatient scores were higher, and hence favourable, for intravenous iron on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia subscale (oral iron 66 (55-72 [23-80]); intravenous iron 71 (66-77 [46-80]); p = 0.002), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia trial outcome index (oral iron 108 (90-123 [35-135]); intravenous iron 121 (113-124 [81-135]); p = 0.003) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia total score (oral iron 151 (132-170 [69-183]); intravenous iron 168 (160-174 [125-186]); p = 0.005). These findings indicate that intravenous iron is more efficacious at improving quality of life scores than oral iron in anaemic colorectal cancer patients.

Randomized clinical trial of preoperative oral versus intravenous iron in anaemic patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of preoperative anaemia is recommended as part of patient blood management, aiming to minimize perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion. No clear evidence exists outlining which treatment modality should be used in patients with colorectal cancer. The study aimed to compare the efficacy of preoperative intravenous and oral iron in reducing blood transfusion use in anaemic patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Anaemic patients with non-metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were recruited at least 2 weeks before surgery and randomized to receive oral (ferrous sulphate) or intravenous (ferric carboxymaltose) iron. Perioperative changes in haemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin saturation and blood transfusion use were recorded until postoperative outpatient review. RESULTS: Some 116 patients were included in the study. There was no difference in blood transfusion use from recruitment to trial completion in terms of either volume of blood administered (P = 0·841) or number of patients transfused (P = 0·470). Despite this, increases in haemoglobin after treatment were higher with intravenous iron (median 1·55 (i.q.r. 0·93-2·58) versus 0·50 (-0·13 to 1·33) g/dl; P < 0·001), which was associated with fewer anaemic patients at the time of surgery (75 versus 90 per cent; P = 0·048). Haemoglobin levels were thus higher at surgery after treatment with intravenous than with oral iron (mean 11·9 (95 per cent c.i. 11·5 to 12·3) versus 11·0 (10·6 to 11·4) g/dl respectively; P = 0·002), as were ferritin (P < 0·001) and transferrin saturation (P < 0·001) levels. CONCLUSION: Intravenous iron did not reduce the blood transfusion requirement but was more effective than oral iron at treating preoperative anaemia and iron deficiency in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

The feasibility and clinical efficacy of intravenous iron administration for preoperative anaemia in patients with colorectal cancer.

AIM: The study aimed to analyse the feasibility and efficacy of administration of a single intravenous iron infusion (IVI) in the preoperative optimization of colorectal cancer patients with anaemia. METHOD: Twenty patients were recruited at least 14 days before the planned date of surgery. A single 1000 mg dose of ferric carboxymaltose (Ferinject) was administered as an outpatient procedure. Blood samples were taken at recruitment prior to drug administration (REC), on the day of surgery prior to any intervention (DOS) and on the first postoperative day. Allogeneic red blood cell transfusions (ARBT) and outcomes were recorded from recruitment throughout the study period. RESULTS: There was a significant median rise in haemoglobin levels (Hb) from REC to DOS of 1.8 g/dl [interquartile range (IQR) 0.75-2.45, P < 0.001] for the entire cohort. Two patients received ARBT preoperatively, and for those not transfused preoperatively (n = 18), this incremental Hb rise remained significant (P < 0.001, median 1.65 g/dl, IQR 0.5-2.3). Of these patients, those who responded to IVI had higher erythropoietin (EPO) levels at recruitment (P < 0.01) and lower recruitment Hb values, transferrin-saturation (TSAT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (P < 0.05). REC Hb (Rs = -0.62, P < 0.01), REC TSAT levels (Rs = -0.67, P < 0.01) and REC EPO (Rs = 0.69, P < 0.01) correlated with the magnitude of treatment change in Hb levels. Five patients received ARBT until the fourth postoperative day, which was significantly fewer than predicted (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: IVI can be administered preoperatively in the outpatient clinic to colorectal cancer patients with anaemia, with associated reduction in ARBT use and increase in Hb levels.

The influence of laparoscopy on incisional hernia rates: a retrospective analysis of 1057 colorectal cancer resections.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of incisional hernia formation after laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer. METHOD: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 1057 colorectal cancer resection cases (289 laparoscopic, 768 open) performed in a single national laparoscopic training centre between January 2006 and December 2011. Clinical notes and serial computed tomography scans were reviewed, with any incisional hernia including those at a surgical incision, port site, stoma and stoma closure site identified and the size of the defect measured. RESULTS: The overall incisional hernia rate was 14.8%. There was no significant difference between the open and laparoscopic groups (14.4% vs 15.9%, P = 0.566). Excluding stoma-related hernia, 10.7% of the open group developed a surgical wound hernia, and 11.1% of the laparoscopic group developed a hernia at a port site, extraction site or surgical midline incision. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.853). The defects were smaller in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.005). There were significantly more parastomal hernias in the laparoscopic group (40%) than in the open group (12.7%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of incisional hernia formation was similar after laparoscopic or open surgery for colorectal cancer. Parastomal hernia was more frequent after laparoscopic surgery.

A tale of two appendices - an unexpected finding.

Anomalies of the appendix are uncommon and are usually discovered incidentally during surgery for appendicitis. We present a rare case of appendiceal duplication, which can have serious consequences if overlooked during an operation.

Iron chelation: a potential therapeutic strategy in oesophageal cancer.

Raised intracellular iron has been identified as a potential aetiological factor in the development of several epithelial malignancies, including those of the gastrointestinal tract. The mechanism behind this increase is thought to include disorders of iron uptake and storage. Several iron chelators have been identified as potential anti-tumour agents, with much work undertaken to ascertain the exact mode of action. Despite this, there is little known about the role that these drugs play in the cellular iron metabolism of oesophageal cancer. Consequently, the present study looks to review the relationship of two clinically important iron-chelating agents, deferoxamine and deferasirox, on cellular iron uptake and storage in oesophageal squamous and adenocarcinoma. This provides important evidence for the debate about the role these agents have in the clinical management of such tumours.

A tale of two appendices - an unexpected finding.

Anomalies of the appendix are uncommon and are usually discovered incidentally during surgery for appendicitis. We present a rare case of appendiceal duplication, which can have serious consequences if overlooked during an operation. Following an initial admission for right iliac fossa pain which led to an uneventful laparoscopic appendicectomy, a 36 year old male was readmitted for increasing abdominal pain and distension. Subsequent surgical exploration revealed a second appendix, which was retrocaecal and gangrenous. Careful inspection of the caecal pole should always be performed during surgery to exclude appendiceal abnormalities such as appendiceal duplication. The Cave-Wallbridge classification exists to provide surgeons with a framework to classify appendiceal duplications.

Selective blockade of oxytocin and vasopressin V(1a) receptors in anaesthetised rats: evidence that activation of oxytocin receptors rather than V(1a) receptors increases sodium excretion.

BACKGROUND: Although it is known that moderate-to-high doses of the neurohypophysial hormones oxytocin and vasopressin are natriuretic, doubts remain over the identity of the receptors responsible. To address this issue, we have used highly selective antagonists of oxytocin and vasopressin receptors in animals with elevated endogenous circulating levels of the 2 hormones. METHODS: Rats were anaesthetised and prepared surgically for clearance studies, thereby raising plasma oxytocin and vasopressin concentrations. Sodium excretion, glomerular filtration rate and lithium clearance (an index of end-proximal fluid delivery) were measured: first during a control period, then after administration of the selective oxytocin receptor antagonist desGly-NH(2),d(CH(2))(5)[D-Trp(2),Thr(4),Dap(5)]OVT, the selective vasopressin V(1a) receptor antagonist d(CH(2))(5)[Tyr(Me)(2),Dab(5)]AVP, or vehicle alone. RESULTS: Absolute and fractional sodium excretion fell in rats given the oxytocin antagonist (by 32 and 27%, respectively, compared with corresponding values in vehicle-infused rats), but not in those given the V(1a) antagonist or vehicle. Antinatriuresis was associated with a small reduction in the ratio of sodium clearance to lithium clearance (an index of the fraction of distally delivered sodium that escapes reabsorption in the distal nephron). CONCLUSIONS: These results corroborate previous studies showing that activation of oxytocin receptors increases sodium excretion and imply that the natriuretic effect of elevated plasma vasopressin concentrations results from stimulation of oxytocin receptors.

Cachexia and the acute-phase protein response in inflammation are regulated by interleukin-6.

Cachexia and the acute-phase response are common manifestations of inflammation and are presumed to be the product of increased synthesis and release of cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin-1 (IL-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). IL-1 receptor blockade has been previously shown to attenuate the weight loss, anorexia and acute-phase protein responses associated with a turpentine abscess. However, IL-1 receptor blockade was also associated with a reduced plasma IL-6 response, suggesting that the benefit achieved by IL-1 receptor blockade may be mediated by reduced systemic IL-6 production. To gain a better understanding of the role of IL-6 in this model of inflammation, C57BL/6 mice were passively immunized with either a monoclonal anti-IL-6 antibody (20F3), an anti-IL-1 type I receptor monoclonal antibody (35F5), a non-immune rat IgG, or a combined therapy of 35F5 and 20F3, before receiving a sterile turpentine abscess. IL-6 or IL-1 receptor blockade equally spared body weight and food intake. Compared to IL-1 receptor blockade, passive immunization against IL-6 further reduced the hepatic acute-phase protein response, as represented by serum amyloid P and complement 3. Combined blockade of IL-6 and IL-1 receptor did not result in a further sparing of body weights or improvement of food intake. These results confirm that IL-1 contributes to host cachexia and the acute-phase response following a turpentine abscess, but also show that these actions are dependent upon an IL-6 response. We conclude that the influence of IL-1 on cachexia and the acute-phase response is mediated, at least in part, through IL-6 and, thus, IL-6 may play a pivotal role in the cachexia and acute-phase response to inflammation.

A patient classification system for the OR.

Changes are still occurring as we continue to refine the tool. We have now determined that not all OR nurses need to learn to use the tool. The head nurse or assistant head nurse can do it quickly. We are continuing to gather data and hope to have input from other hospitals interested in testing the tool.

MHPG excretion in depressive disorders: relation to clinical subtypes and desynchronized sleep.

The urinary excretion of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG) was significantly lower in patients with manic-depressive depressions than in patients with chronic characterological depressions. There was an inverse relationship between MHPG excretion and the amount of time spent in desynchronized sleep, particularly in the manic-depressive disorders. Excretion of MHPG was not related to the degree of retardation, agitation, or anxiety in these patients.