Gun shot-101: an 8-year review of gunshot injuries in an Irish teaching hospital from a general surgical perspective.

BACKGROUND: Gun-related crime offences have increased in the Republic of Ireland steadily over the past number of years. Regional trauma units are witnessing unprecedented numbers of injuries in the Republic of Ireland with limited prior experience. AIMS: Eight-year retrospective study analysing demographic data, management and outcome of firearm-related injuries. RESULTS: Patients who experience gunshot injuries in this region are statistically likely to be young, male and unemployed with a single shotgun injury to an extremity. Post-operative survival rates of 100% for those who undergo an exploratory laparotomy. CONCLUSION: Ireland has comparable survival outcomes to other international centres with similar patient demographics due to timely and appropriate operative intervention. These results serve to provide a template for further patient management.

Clinicopathologic factors predicting complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Multimodal therapy comprising neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy prior to radical resection is increasingly utilized in gastroesophageal cancer. The achievement of a complete pathological response (pCR) or a major response is associated with an improved survival. However, up to 70% of patients show an incomplete or no response to the neoadjuvant regimen, and the identification of factors which predict a response would be of considerable clinical benefit. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively updated esophageal cancer database was performed. The predictive values of the following clinicopathological factors were investigated: age, sex, tobacco, alcohol, weight, clinical history, tumor type, site, length, width, morphology and differentiation. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square test with Pearson's test or Kruskal-Wallis test. One hundred and seventy-six patients were identified who had undergone neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy at St James's Hospital Dublin, between January 1990 and June 2003. A complete pathological response was seen in 40 cases (23%). There was a significant (P < 0.05) relationship between response to chemoradiotherapy and pretreatment tumor length. The median tumor length in the pCR group was 2 cm (1-5 cm) compared with 3 cm (2-7 cm) in non-responders (P < 0.05). Body weight, sex, tobacco or alcohol usage, tumor site, or differentiation were not predictive of response, although a trend (P = 0.08) was observed for squamous cell cancer compared with adenocarcinoma. Smaller tumor length was predictive of a greater response to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. This may reflect different tumor biology, perhaps with acquired resistance to treatment-induced apoptosis in the larger tumors. A simpler explanation is that the existing dose and treatment schedule for combination chemoradiotherapy is suboptimal in patients with larger tumors.

Lansoprazole is superior to ranitidine as maintenance treatment for the prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse.

AIM: To compare lansoprazole 30 mg once daily, lansoprazole 15 mg once daily and ranitidine 150 mg once nightly in the prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse in patients whose duodenal ulcers had been previously healed with lansoprazole 30 mg once daily or ranitidine 300 mg nightly. METHODS: A double-blind, parallel group, randomized multicentre study conducted in 33 centres in the UK, Eire, Sweden and Australia. Two hundred and nineteen patients with a duodenal ulcer were randomized to receive lansoprazole 30 mg and 217 to receive ranitidine 300 mg for 8 weeks. Patients were then re-randomized to receive lansoprazole 30 mg (122 patients), lansoprazole 15 mg (121 patients) or ranitidine 150 mg (116 patients) for 12 months. All patients had an endoscopically-proven duodenal ulcer at baseline and were considered suitable for long-term maintenance therapy to prevent relapse. RESULTS: Significantly more patients were healed on lansoprazole (98%) compared to ranitidine (89%) (P < 0.001, Fisher's exact test). Lansoprazole provided more rapid symptom relief than ranitidine. Lansoprazole 30 mg and lansoprazole 15 mg increased the probability of not relapsing in comparison to ranitidine (P = 0.001 and 0.06, respectively, life-table analysis). Relapse rates over the 12 months were lower in the lansoprazole treatment groups (lansoprazole 30 mg, 5%; lansoprazole 15 mg, 12%; and ranitidine, 21%; lansoprazole 30 mg vs. ranitidine 150 mg, P = 0.002). Symptoms were well controlled in both groups during the maintenance phase. All treatments were well tolerated with no major differences seen in adverse event profiles between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both doses of lansoprazole (30 mg and 15 mg) were superior to ranitidine 150 mg in the prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse. Lansoprazole was superior to ranitidine in terms of symptom control and duodenal ulcer healing. Both treatments were well tolerated.