Management options of valvular heart diseases after heart transplantation: A scoping review.

Background: This study aimed to outline the valvular changes following heart transplantation and describe the management options to address these conditions. Methods: A literature search using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines in this study. Clinical studies involving patients who had their first heart transplant and articles that mentioned management for valvular heart disease were included. Treatment options were grouped into four categories: cardiac surgery other than retransplant and valve surgery, valve replacement and repairs, nonsurgical interventions, and conservative management. Results: Nine hundred and three (6.56%) patients out of 13,757 patients (10,529 males, 3,228 females; mean age: 60.3±10.4 years; range, 20 to 83 years) undergoing heart transplantation were identified with valvular disease affecting one or more valves. The mean interval between the transplant and the diagnosis of valve disease was 11.31±6.95 years. The most common valvular heart disease was tricuspid regurgitation, with 796 (94.09%) occurrences, followed by mitral regurgitation (n=22, 2.6%), aortic regurgitation (n=14, 1.65%), aortic stenosis (n=11, 1.3%), and mitral stenosis (n=3, 0.35%). Additionally, the number of surgical valve replacement and repairs (n=89) was higher than nonsurgical interventions (n=20). Conclusion: Acquired valvular heart diseases after cardiac transplantation are an infrequent clinical presentation that can cause valvular changes in the recipient. According to the extracted data, there is no sole superior management option, and more research is needed in this area.

Transcatheter Transseptal Mitral Valve-in-Valve Replacement: An Early Australian Case Series and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter mitral valve implantation for degenerated bioprostheses has recently emerged as an alternative to redo mitral valve surgery, particularly in patients at high risk for reoperative cardiac surgery. We sought to examine our early experience of transcatheter transseptal mitral valve-in-valve procedures. METHODS: Prospectively collected data was retrospectively reviewed in patients undergoing transcatheter transseptal mitral valve-in-valve implantation using the Edwards Sapien 3 balloon expandable bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA). RESULTS: Seven (7) patients underwent the procedure between December 2017 and November 2018. Three (3) patients were young Indigenous Australians (age range 33-41years) who were not suitable for mechanical prostheses; four patients were elderly (age range 82-92 years) and considered high risk for reoperative surgery. The median (maximum, minimum) EuroSCORE II of the group was 7.32 (4.81, 19.89). Procedural success was obtained in six of the seven patients; these six patients had no significant complications and had a median hospital stay of 3 days. In one patient, the device displaced towards the left ventricle on inflation, resulting in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and haemodynamic instability. Urgent redo mitral valve surgery and explantation of the transcatheter prosthesis was undertaken, however, this patient died postoperatively of multi-organ failure. Of the successfully deployed valves, the median (maximum, minimum) gradient across the new mitral prosthesis was 5.5 mmHg (4, 7) and only one patient had mild mitral regurgitation, all others had no or trivial regurgitation. At 30 days, these six patients are well and all are in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I. CONCLUSIONS: Our early experience with transcatheter transseptal mitral valve-in-valve implantation demonstrates this procedure to be feasible in our institution with acceptable early results. Further follow-up is necessary to determine the longevity of valves implanted in this manner, especially in the younger population.

Outcomes of Redo Valve Surgery in Indigenous Australians.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic heart disease often leads to valve surgery at a young age in our Indigenous population. Anticoagulation can be problematic and therefore repeat surgery to replace degenerated bioprosthetic valves is common. We sought to examine outcomes following redo valve surgery in this population. METHODS: Data from our institutional database was reviewed from 1992 to 2017. During this period, 82 redo valve surgeries were performed in 73 patients identifying as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander. We compared this study group to Indigenous patients undergoing primary valve surgery (n=389) and non-Indigenous patients undergoing redo valve surgery (n=154). RESULTS: Redo patients had a median age of 29.5 years (IQR 24, 44), 59% were female, and they had significant comorbidities. The 30-day mortality in this cohort was 6% (EuroSCORE II 3.57), and they had significant morbidity. The median time to repeat surgery in those who had previous mitral valve surgery was 6.3 years, with no difference between mitral valve repair or replacement at the index procedure. Compared to non-Indigenous patients undergoing redo valve surgery, the Indigenous patients were significantly younger with higher left ventricular function but a greater proportion of pulmonary hypertension. There were no significant differences in short-term outcomes. Compared to Indigenous patients undergoing primary valve surgery, the Indigenous redo patients were significantly younger with more co-morbidities. There was no difference in 30-day mortality, but the redo patients did have significantly greater resource utilisation (increased hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay, ventilation and blood transfusion) and poorer long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Indigenous patients presenting for redo valve surgery represent a complex and comorbid group of patients, with outcomes worse than expected in a young population, albeit comparable within study groups. Time from original surgery was short at 6 years, and thus a strategy must be in place in terms of planning future surgeries in this cohort of predominantly young rheumatic heart disease patients.