Subject(s)
Education, Distance/organization & administration , Education , Hospitals, Low-Volume , Hospitals, Pediatric , Pediatrics/education , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Education/methods , Education/organization & administration , Education/standards , Hospitals, Low-Volume/organization & administration , Hospitals, Low-Volume/standards , Hospitals, Pediatric/organization & administration , Hospitals, Pediatric/standards , Humans , Needs Assessment , Program Evaluation , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare contraceptive method selection in women undergoing their first pregnancy termination versus women undergoing repeat pregnancy termination in an urban abortion clinic. We hypothesized that women undergoing repeat abortions will select highly effective contraceptives (intrauterine device, subdermal implant, tubal ligation) more often than patients undergoing their first abortion. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all women undergoing first-trimester surgical abortion at John H. Stroger, Jr., Hospital of Cook County from October 1, 2009, to October 31, 2011. We compared contraceptive method selection in the postabortion period after receipt of contraceptive counseling for 7466 women, stratifying women by history of no prior abortion versus one or more abortions. RESULTS: Of the 7466 women, 48.6% (3625) had no history of previous abortion. After controlling for age, race and number of living children, women with a history of abortion were more likely to select a highly effective method [odds ratio (OR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.33]. Most significantly, having living children was the strongest predictor of a highly effective method with an OR of 3.17 (95% CI 2.69-3.75). CONCLUSIONS: In women having a first-trimester abortion, the factors most predictive of selecting a highly effective method for postabortion contraception include history of previous abortion and having living children. The latter holds true independent of abortion history. IMPLICATIONS: This paper is unique in its ability to demonstrate the high interest in highly effective contraceptive selection in high-risk, low-income women with prior abortion history. Efforts to integrate provision of highly effective methods of contraception for postabortion care are essential for the reduction of future unintended pregnancies.
Subject(s)
Abortion Applicants/statistics & numerical data , Abortion, Induced , Contraception/classification , Contraceptive Agents/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Family Planning Services , Female , Humans , Intrauterine Devices , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Sterilization, Tubal , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Multiple scoring systems exist to identify inpatients who are at risk for clinical deterioration. None of these systems have been evaluated in an obstetric population. We examined the Systemic Inflammatory Response syndrome (SIRS) and Modified Early Warning score (MEWS) criteria in pregnant women with chorioamnionitis. STUDY DESIGN: This was an 18-month retrospective analysis of patients with chorioamnionitis. SIRS and MEWS scores were calculated; clinical outcomes were ascertained, and test characteristics were calculated for the primary outcome of sepsis, intensive care unit transfer, or death. RESULTS: Nine hundred thirteen women with chorioamnionitis were identified. Five women experienced sepsis; there was 1 death. Five hundred seventy-five of the 913 women (63%) met SIRS criteria (95% confidence interval, 59.8-66.2%; positive predictive value, 0.9%). Ninety-two of the 913 women (10.3%) had a MEWS score of ≥ 5 (95% confidence interval, 8.3-12.2%; positive predictive value, 0.05%). CONCLUSION: SIRS and MEWS criteria do not identify accurately patients who are at risk for intensive care unit transfer, sepsis, or death among pregnant women with intrauterine infection and should not be used in an obstetric setting.
