SOX2 and OCT4 mediate radiation and drug resistance in pancreatic tumor organoids.

Pancreatic cancer has a five-year survival rate of only 10%, mostly due to late diagnosis and limited treatment options. In patients with unresectable disease, either FOLFIRINOX, a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin and irinotecan, or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combined with radiation are frontline standard regimens. However, chemo-radiation therapy has shown limited success because patients develop resistance to chemotherapy and/or radiation. In this study, we evaluated the role of pancreatic cancer stem cells (CSC) using OCT4 and SOX2, CSC markers in mouse pancreatic tumor organoids. We treated pancreatic tumor organoids with 4 or 8 Gy of radiation, 10 µM of 5-FU (5-Fluorouracil), and 100 µM 3-Bromopyruvate (3BP), a promising anti-cancer drug, as a single treatment modalities, and in combination with RT. Our results showed significant upregulation of, OCT4, and SOX2 expression in pancreatic tumor organoids treated with 4 and 8 Gy of radiation, and downregulation following 5-FU treatment. The expression of CSC markers with increasing treatment dose exhibited elevated upregulation levels to radiation and downregulation to 5-FU chemotherapy drug. Conversely, when tumor organoids were treated with a combination of 5-FU and radiation, there was a significant inhibition in SOX2 and OCT4 expression, indicating CSC self-renewal inhibition. Noticeably, we also observed that human pancreatic tumor tissues exhibited heterogeneous and aberrant OCT4 and SOX2 expression as compared to normal pancreas, indicating their potential role in pancreatic cancer growth and therapy resistance. In addition, the combination of 5-FU and radiation treatment exhibited significant inhibition of the ß-catenin pathway in pancreatic tumor organoids, resulting in sensitization to treatment and organoid death. In conclusion, our study emphasizes the crucial role of CSCs in therapeutic resistance in PC treatment. We recommend using tumor organoids as a model system to explore the impact of CSCs in PC and identify new therapeutic targets.

Docetaxel radiosensitizes castration-resistant prostate cancer by downregulating CAV-1.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel (DXL), a noted radiosensitizer, is one of the few chemotherapy drugs approved for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), though only a fraction of CRPCs respond to it. CAV-1, a critical regulator of radioresistance, has been known to modulate DXL and radiation effects. Combining DXL with radiotherapy may create a synergistic anticancer effect through CAV-1 and improve CRPC patients' response to therapy. Here, we investigate the effectiveness and molecular characteristics of DXL and radiation combination therapy in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used live/dead assays to determine the IC50 of DXL for PC3, DU-145, and TRAMP-C1 cells. Colony formation assay was used to determine the radioresponse of the same cells treated with radiation with/without IC50 DXL (4, 8, and 12 Gy). We performed gene expression analysis on public transcriptomic data collected from human-derived prostate cancer cell lines (C4-2, PC3, DU-145, and LNCaP) treated with DXL for 8, 16, and 72 hours. Cell cycle arrest and protein expression were assessed using flow cytometry and western blot, respectively. RESULTS: Compared to radiation alone, combination therapy with DXL significantly increased CRPC death in PC3 (1.48-fold, p < .0001), DU-145 (1.64-fold, p < .05), and TRAMP-C1 (1.13-fold, p < .05) at 4 Gy of radiation. Gene expression of CRPC treated with DXL revealed downregulated genes related to cell cycle regulation and upregulated genes related to immune activation and oxidative stress. Confirming the results, G2/M cell cycle arrest was significantly increased after treatment with DXL and radiation. CAV-1 protein expression was decreased after DXL treatment in a dose-dependent manner; furthermore, CAV-1 copy number was strongly associated with poor response to therapy in CRPC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that DXL sensitizes CRPC cells to radiation by downregulating CAV-1. DXL + radiation combination therapy may be effective at treating CRPC, especially subtypes associated with high CAV-1 expression, and should be studied further.

The Use of Three-dimensional Visualization Techniques for Prostate Procedures: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: As an emerging technique, three-dimensional (3D) visualization has become more popular and can facilitate education, training, surgical planning, and intraoperative guidance for prostate cancer surgery. OBJECTIVE: In this review, we aim to present the impact of 3D printing, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR) techniques for prostate cancer procedures, specifically prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was performed by two investigators according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 541 papers were identified in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Of these, 53 studies were identified for detailed review and 25 were qualified. Two more studies were identified from the references; thus, 27 studies were finally included in this systematic review. Nine papers reported on the use of 3D reconstructed models, mainly in education/training and intraoperative guidance; nine reported on VR, focusing on simulation training model and intraoperative guidance; and nine reported on AR technique with its best indication for surgical guidance in robotic RP. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional visualization techniques have gradually been introduced and developed in prostate procedures, and demonstrate potential utility not only for education/training, but also for surgical planning and intraoperative guidance. Prospective studies are needed to demonstrate clinical utility and validation of these technologies. PATIENT SUMMARY: Despite low-quality evidence, promising signals were identified to demonstrate that three-dimensional visualization could help facilitate prostate procedures, in terms of education/training, surgical planning, and intraoperative guidance. It is still in a very early stage, and more studies need to be conducted to justify its widespread use.