Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Euro Surveill ; 19(45): 20954, 2014 Nov 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25411691

ABSTRACT

Farm animals are a potential reservoir for human Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), particularly PCR ribotype 078 which is frequently found in animals and humans. Here, whole genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis was used to study the evolutionary relatedness of C. difficile 078 isolated from humans and animals on Dutch pig farms. All sequenced genomes were surveyed for potential antimicrobial resistance determinants and linked to an antimicrobial resistance phenotype. We sequenced the whole genome of 65 C. difficile 078 isolates collected between 2002 and 2011 from pigs (n = 19), asymptomatic farmers (n = 15) and hospitalised patients (n = 31) in the Netherlands. The collection included 12 pairs of human and pig isolates from 2011 collected at 12 different pig farms. A mutation rate of 1.1 SNPs per genome per year was determined for C. difficile 078. Importantly, we demonstrate that farmers and pigs were colonised with identical (no SNP differences) and nearly identical (less than two SNP differences) C. difficile clones. Identical tetracycline and streptomycin resistance determinants were present in human and animal C. difficile 078 isolates. Our observation that farmers and pigs share identical C. difficile strains suggests transmission between these populations, although we cannot exclude the possibility of transmission from a common environmental source.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/classification , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Ribotyping , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Clostridium Infections/veterinary , Genome-Wide Association Study , Genotype , Humans , Netherlands/epidemiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Sus scrofa , Swine
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 18(7): 635-45, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22536816

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) are traditionally seen in elderly and hospitalized patients who have used antibiotic therapy. In the community, CDIs requiring a visit to a general practitioner are increasingly occurring among young and relatively healthy individuals without known predisposing factors. C. difficile is also found as a commensal or pathogen in the intestinal tracts of most mammals, and various birds and reptiles. In the environment, including soil and water, C. difficile may be ubiquitous; however, this is based on limited evidence. Food products such as (processed) meat, fish and vegetables can also contain C. difficile, but studies conducted in Europe report lower prevalence rates than in North America. Absolute counts of toxigenic C. difficile in the environment and food are low, however the exact infectious dose is unknown. To date, direct transmission of C. difficile from animals, food or the environment to humans has not been proven, although similar PCR ribotypes are found. We therefore believe that the overall epidemiology of human CDI is not driven by amplification in animals or other sources. As no outbreaks of CDI have been reported among humans in the community, host factors that increase vulnerability to CDI might be of more importance than increased exposure to C. difficile. Conversely, emerging C. difficile ribotype 078 is found in high numbers in piglets, calves, and their immediate environment. Although there is no direct evidence proving transmission to humans, circumstantial evidence points towards a zoonotic potential of this type. In future emerging PCR ribotypes, zoonotic potential needs to be considered.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/transmission , Clostridium Infections/veterinary , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Community-Acquired Infections/transmission , Zoonoses/microbiology , Zoonoses/transmission , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Cattle Diseases/transmission , Clostridioides difficile/classification , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Environmental Microbiology , Food Microbiology , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Genotype , Humans , Molecular Epidemiology , Molecular Typing , Swine , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Swine Diseases/transmission
3.
Environ Res ; 111(8): 1027-32, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22014605

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile is increasingly recognized as an important enteropathogen in both humans and animals. The finding of C. difficile in air samples in hospitals suggests a role for aerial dissemination in the transmission of human C. difficile infection. The present study was designed to investigate the occurrence of airborne C. difficile in, and nearby a pig farm with a high prevalence of C. difficile. Airborne colony counts in the farrowing pens peaked on the moments shortly after or during personnel activity in the pens (P=0.043 (farrowing pens 1, 2), P=0.034 (farrowing pen 2)). A decrease in airborne C. difficile colony counts was observed parallel to aging of the piglets. Airborne C. difficile was detected up to 20 m distant from the farm. This study showed widespread aerial dissemination of C. difficile on a pig farm that was positively associated with personnel activity.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Animal Husbandry , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Swine , Animals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Longitudinal Studies
4.
Vet Microbiol ; 154(1-2): 130-4, 2011 Dec 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21783332

ABSTRACT

Foodborne ingestion through pork products of Clostridium difficile has been suggested a possible route of transmission of C difficile from pigs to humans. To determine whether C. difficile bacteria are present in the intestines of slaughter pigs, rectum contents of 677 slaughter pigs from 52 farms were collected at the slaughterhouse. Data on farm specific factors were collected and the association of these factors with the presence of C. difficile in pig herds from 39 farms was assessed. The prevalence of C. difficile and the ribotypical diversity that were found in this study were much higher than previously reported in literature, with an overall C. difficile prevalence of 8.6% (58/677). Sixteen distinct C. difficile ribotypes were identified, predominantly type 078 (31.0%, 18/58). This type is also commonly found in humans with C. difficile infection (CDI). Both on individual pig level and on herd level, no significant difference between the prevalence of C. difficile in pigs derived from conventional or organic farming types was detected. Farm system, size, and presence of other animal species on the farm did not result in significant different prevalences of C. difficile.


Subject(s)
Abattoirs , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/veterinary , Intestines/microbiology , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Swine/microbiology , Animal Husbandry/methods , Animals , Clostridioides difficile/classification , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Feces/microbiology , Meat/microbiology , Netherlands , Prevalence , Ribotyping , Swine Diseases/transmission
5.
Vet Microbiol ; 153(3-4): 205-17, 2011 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21530110

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile is well known as the most common cause of nosocomial infections in human patients. In recent years a change in epidemiology towards an increase in incidence and severity of disease, not only inside the hospital, but also in the community, is reported. C. difficile is increasingly recognized in veterinary medicine as well and is now considered the most important cause of neonatal diarrhea in swine in North America. Research on the presence of C. difficile in production and companion animals revealed a huge overlap with strains implicated in human C. difficile infection (CDI). This has lead to the concern that interspecies transmission of this bacterium occurs. In this review C. difficile infections in humans and animals are compared. The pathogenesis, clinical signs, diagnosis and prevalence of CDI are described and similarities and differences of CDI between humans and animals are discussed.


Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections , Animals , Clostridioides difficile/classification , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Clostridium Infections/pathology , Clostridium Infections/transmission , Humans , Prevalence , Ribotyping , Risk Factors , Zoonoses/microbiology
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(5): 1816-21, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21411571

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile is emerging as pathogen in both humans and animals. In 2000 it was described as one of the causes of neonatal enteritis in piglets, and it is now the most common cause of neonatal diarrhea in the United States. In Europe, C. difficile infection (CDI) in both neonatal piglets and adult sows has also been reported. Diagnosis of this infection is based on detection of the bacterium C. difficile or its toxins A and B. Most detection methods, however, are only validated for diagnosing human infections. In this study three commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and a commercial real-time-PCR (Becton, Dickinson, and Company) were evaluated by testing 172 pig fecal specimens (139 diarrheic and 33 nondiarrheic piglets). The results of each test were compared to those of cytotoxicity assays (CTAs) and toxigenic culture as the "gold standards." Compared to CTAs, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were, respectively, as follows: for real-time PCR, 91.6, 37.1, 57.6, and 82.5%; for Premier Toxins A&B (Meridian), 83.1, 31.5, 53.1, and 66.7%; for ImmunoCard Toxins A&B kit (ICTAB; Meridian), 86.6, 56.8, 66.9, and 80.7%; and for VIDAS (bioMérieux), 54.8, 92.6, 85.0, and 72.8%. Compared to toxigenic culture, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were, respectively, as follows: for real-time PCR, 93.0, 34.7, 50.0, and 87.5%; for Premier Toxins A&B, 80.3, 27.7, 43.8, and 66.7%; and for ICTAB, 80.0, 46.2, 52.8, and 75.4%; and for VIDAS, 56.4, 89.8, 77.5, and 76.7%. We conclude that all tests had an unacceptably low performance as a single test for the detection of C. difficile in pig herds and that a two-step algorithm is necessary, similar to that in cases of human CDI. Of all of the assays, the real-time PCR had the highest NPV compared to both reference methods and is therefore the most appropriate test to screen for the absence of C. difficile in pigs as a first step in the algorithm. The second step would be a confirmation of the positive results by toxigenic culture.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Clostridium Infections/veterinary , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Animals , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine , Swine Diseases/microbiology
7.
Vet Microbiol ; 149(1-2): 186-92, 2011 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21111541

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile is recognized as an important cause of nosocomial diarrhoea in humans especially in association with administration of antibiotics. In pigs, C. difficile can cause neonatal enteritis and can be isolated from faeces from both diseased and healthy animals. The presented prospective study describes how soon C. difficile can be isolated from newborn piglets after normal parturition and how C. difficile spreads within a pig farm. Six sows, their farrowing crates and their litters at one farm were sampled until C. difficile was found in all piglets. Within 48 h after birth, all 71 piglets became positive for C. difficile (two piglets were already positive within 1h post partum), all sows became positive within 113 h after parturition and the farrowing crates were found intermittently positive. C. difficile could also be detected in air samples and in samples of teats of the sows. All isolates belonged to PCR ribotype 078. Twenty-one C. difficile ribotype 078 isolates, found at the farm, were further analyzed by MLVA (multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis) and belonged to one clonal complex, except one isolate. To be sure that piglets were not born already infected with C. difficile ribotype 078, 38 caesarean derived piglets were sampled immediately after surgery. All piglets tested negative at delivery and stayed negative for C. difficile ribotype 078 during the 21 days in which they were kept in sterile incubators. This study shows that C. difficile ribotype 078 spreads easily between sows, piglets and the environment. Vertical transmission of C. difficile ribotype 078 was not found and is very unlikely to occur.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/veterinary , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Swine/microbiology , Animals , Animals, Newborn/microbiology , Clostridioides difficile/classification , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/microbiology , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/transmission , Environmental Microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Female , Minisatellite Repeats , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prospective Studies , Ribotyping , Swine Diseases/transmission
8.
J Clin Microbiol ; 48(10): 3744-9, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20686080

ABSTRACT

Totals of 102 and 56 Clostridium difficile type 078 strains of human and porcine origins, respectively, from four European countries were investigated by an optimized multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) and for tetracycline susceptibility. Eighty-five percent of all isolates were genetically related, irrespective of human or porcine origin. Human strains were significantly more resistant to tetracycline than porcine strains. All tetracycline-resistant strains contained the Tn916-like transposon harboring the tet(M) gene. We conclude that strains from human and porcine origins are genetically related, irrespective of the country of origin. This may reflect a lack of diversity and/or common source.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/classification , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Clostridium Infections/veterinary , DNA Fingerprinting , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Tetracycline Resistance , Animals , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Cluster Analysis , DNA Transposable Elements , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Europe , Genotype , Humans , Minisatellite Repeats , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Ribotyping , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...