ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic led many in-office therapeutic programs to pivot to virtual programming without empirical data supporting the acceptability and efficacy of the remote-delivered adaptations. These adaptations were essential for continuing care and addressing surging youth psychological problems at the time. To serve adolescents with comorbid psychiatric disorders and associated problems (e.g., emotion dysregulation), we adapted and implemented virtual and hybrid formats of a dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents (DBT-A; Rathus & Miller, 2015) program within a public university training clinic, such as separating the traditional multifamily group into adolescent-only and caregiver-only groups. Building on qualitative reports on virtual DBT-A, we explored preliminary service user and clinical outcomes of the virtual and hybrid DBT-A adolescent skills group component in a longitudinal retrospective cohort study for teenagers treated during the first 2 years of the pandemic (N = 21; 81% Hispanic/Latinx; 100% White). Aim 1 described service user outcomes (e.g., retention, group cohesion, client satisfaction) in the remote-delivered skills groups. Most youth completed treatment. Caregiver satisfaction was high, whereas adolescent satisfaction was mild. Aim 2 explored preliminary clinical outcomes of remote-delivered skills group adaptations. Overall anxiety, panic, and two emotion regulation facets (i.e., emotional awareness; goal pursuit when upset) significantly reduced across treatment. There were no significant reductions in depression. No suicide attempts or suicides occurred during the program. Further work is needed to clarify the efficacy of telehealth formats of DBT-A skills groups in larger, more racially diverse samples and to identify which adolescents are most appropriate for virtual and/or hybrid DBT-A. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
ABSTRACT
Despite the significant increase in adolescent mental health challenges in recent years, structural barriers continue to limit access to and engagement in mental health services. As such, opportunities to learn directly from adolescents and their families on how to best structure and deliver services are paramount. The current study assumes a multi-informant approach and reports on adolescents' and caregivers' (N = 33) experiences in an adapted telehealth/hybrid Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (DBT-A) program. Focus groups were conducted across two cohorts of families who participated in DBT-A skills groups, to collect family-centered data on the acceptability of program modifications, engagement in the adapted telehealth/hybrid DBT-A, and recommendations for improvement. Participants were predominately Latine White and were from a broad range of socioeconomic backgrounds. Additionally, 45.5% of the adolescents identified as LGBTQ + . Focus group findings emphasized how the telehealth platform was both convenient and disengaging, and how in-person sessions offered improved group connection and content engagement. Participants underscored the importance of balancing multi-family group sessions with adolescent- and caregiver-only group sessions in the program, and adolescents emphasized a need for the DBT-A program to better center adolescents' unique experiences and voices throughout sessions. Both adolescents and caregivers suggested modifications to synthesize the content and improve generalizability of the DBT-A skills to their real lives. Overall, these findings add to a new and evolving branch of DBT-A qualitative inquiry, as well as the growing body of work that recommends incorporating the voices of people with lived experiences into the development and modification of psychological services.
