A phase I study of the combination of palbociclib and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PURPOSE: Despite advances in the treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), outcomes for relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease remain poor. Preclinical studies suggest that the combination of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib and dexamethasone may be effective in targeting leukemic cell growth. We conducted a phase I study of escalating doses of palbociclib in combination with dexamethasone in adults with R/R B-ALL. METHODS: Cycle 1 consisted of single agent palbociclib given for 7 days and continued for 28 additional days in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg daily. Palbociclib dosing began at 100 mg daily. Patients with a response were eligible for maintenance consisting of 1 week of palbociclib plus dexamethasone (20 mg daily × 2 days, 16 mg daily × 2 days, 12 mg daily × 2 days, 6 mg daily × 1 day), followed by 3 weeks of palbociclib alone. Safety, efficacy, and the expression of phospho-RB and c-MYB/BCL-2 were measured. CONCLUSIONS: Seven patients were treated on study before it was closed early due to slow accrual. No dose limiting toxicities were identified. One patient had a complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery, suggesting possible efficacy of the treatment. Reduction in CD34+ cells, p-RB, c-MYB, and BCL-2 expression also suggested on-target therapy effects.

A Prospective, Randomized Trial Examining the Use of G-CSF Versus No G-CSF in Patients Post-Autologous Transplantation.

Contemporary, prospective data regarding the impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on outcomes after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT) in an era when stem cell grafts are more qualitatively robust are limited. Recent retrospective analyses have not supported a beneficial effect of post-transplantation G-CSF use on major outcomes after Auto-HSCT leading to strategies to delay or eliminate the use of G-CSF altogether in this context. To test the hypothesis that the infusion of consistently higher doses of stem cells (defined as ≥4 × 106/kg) in Auto-HSCT will obviate the need for post-transplantation G-CSF. If so, the impact of withholding G-CSF will be noninferior to the use of G-CSF in terms of length of stay (LOS). The specific objectives were to conduct a prospective, randomized clinical trial primarily examining the impact of post-transplantation G-CSF on LOS, and secondarily on engraftment, infectious complications, antibiotic usage, and incidence of engraftment syndrome after Auto-HSCT in patients receiving versus not receiving G-CSF after Auto-HSCT. Patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who underwent Pegfilgrastim plus Plerixafor-primed stem cell collection followed by Auto-HSCT were randomized to the G-CSF group (receive G-CSF starting at day 3 after Auto-HSCT) or the no G-CSF group (G-CSF withheld after Auto-HSCT). Seventy patients per arm were planned to demonstrate the primary endpoint of noninferiority in LOS between the G-CSF and the no G-CSF groups. Patient outcomes in the two groups were followed up and compared after Auto-HSCT, and an interim analysis for futility was planned when accrual reached 50%.The primary finding of this study was that despite only a 2-day longer median absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery in the no G-CSF arm (median 11 versus 13 days; P = .001), LOS was 4 days longer in patients not treated with G-CSF (median 11 days versus 15 days; P = .001). G-CSF use was associated with more robust incremental daily increases in ANC once recovered (P = .001), fewer days of febrile neutropenia (P = .001), and fewer days on antibiotics (P = .001), potentially contributing to this disproportionate finding. Inferiority in LOS in the no G-CSF group was demonstrated on the interim analysis, and the study was closed at the half-way point. There were no significant group differences in platelet recovery, documented infections, hospital readmissions, or overall survival at 1 year. Engraftment syndrome occurred in 54.3% of patients and was not related to G-CSF use. These results suggest that the increased LOS associated with the omission of G-CSF is largely due to concerns regarding the potential for infection in patients without a stable, recovered ANC in a hospital setting. Engraftment syndrome represented a significant source of febrile neutropenia further contributing to patient safety concerns and requires strategies to decrease its incidence. Infectious complications and death were not affected by the omission of G-CSF supporting a carefully monitored outpatient approach to Auto-HSCT in which white blood cell growth factor is eliminated or given as needed for documented infection. © 2023 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Inpatient versus outpatient hypomethylating agent induction for acute myeloid leukemia as a predictor for survival.

The hypomethylating agents (HMA) decitabine and azacitidine are used in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for induction therapy in select patients. They are given on either inpatient (IP) or outpatient (OP) services and the decision where to administer them is complex but ultimately depends on the risk for neutropenic infections, hyperleukocytosis and other complications. In our study, we investigated 100-day survival differences between IP and OP HMA induction. This study reviewed 68 patients, 29 of whom received HMA as an IP while 39 received it as an OP. Using a logistic regression model, we found that IP induction was associated with a significantly lower odds of survival at 100-days (Odds Ratio 5.90; p=0.005). Given these results, we hypothesize the survival difference was related to the inherent risk associated with being admitted for chemotherapy, whether it be neutropenic fever, hyperleukocytosis or other reasons. We advise physicians who are administering IP HMA to consider its' inherent risk associated with its' administration.

Case Report: Tocilizumab for the Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Patient With Aplastic Anemia.

While cytokine storm develops in a minority of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, novel treatment approaches are desperately needed for those in whom it does. Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antibody, has been utilized for the treatment of cytokine storm in a number of severe inflammatory conditions, including in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here, we present the first published case utilizing this therapy in a patient with underlying immunodeficiency. Our patient with aplastic anemia developed cytokine storm due to COVID-19 manifested by fever, severe hypoxia, pulmonary infiltrates, and elevated inflammatory markers. Following treatment with tocilizumab, cytokine storm resolved, and the patient was ultimately safely discharged from the hospital.

Caring for AML Patients During the COVID-19 Crisis: An American and Italian Experience.

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the subsequent pandemic have impacted every aspect of oncology care worldwide. Healthcare systems have been forced to rapidly change practices in order to maximize the safety of patients and healthcare providers and preserve scare resources. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia are at increased risk of complications from SARS-CoV-2 not only due to immune compromise related to the malignancy but also due to the acuity of the disease and intensity of treatment. These issues have created unique challenges during this difficult time. In this article, we present the approaches taken by two groups of hematologist/oncologists, one in the United States and one in Italy, who have been caring for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in the face of the pandemic.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Update on Upfront Therapy in Elderly Patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) disproportionately impacts elderly patients. Treating elderly patients with AML has been a challenge due to the increased prevalence of medical comorbidities and decreased performance status in this population, as well as the different biology of AML in elderly patients. RECENT FINDINGS: The care of elderly patients with AML has advanced significantly over the past few years. Our greater understanding of the biology of AML in elderly patients has led to the development of novel, lower-intensity treatment options. We present here a review of the most recent literature regarding therapeutic options available to older patients, as well as tools to help identify the right treatment for the right patient. As targeted and lower-intensity treatment options become available, developing an approach to "right size" therapy for individual elderly patients is paramount.

The new oral anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism: a new paradigm shift in antithrombotic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Several novel oral anticoagulants have been studied for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in different patient populations. Clinicians will increasingly encounter scenarios in which they must choose among these and conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of this potentially fatal condition. OBJECTIVE: To review the results of Phase III clinical trials that investigated the novel oral anticoagulants for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Potential advantages and disadvantages of these anticoagulant agents with respect to each other and conventional therapy will also be explored through a case-based approach. METHODS: A literature search in PubMed was conducted that identified Phase III clinical trials investigating the novel oral anticoagulant agents for the treatment of VTE. RESULTS: The new oral anticoagulant agents have been shown to be as safe and effective for the treatment of VTE as conventional therapies. CONCLUSIONS: These novel, oral anticoagulant agents are legitimate options for the treatment of VTE. A careful assessment of a patient׳s comorbidities, medication use, and laboratory results should be undertaken before prescribing the new oral anticoagulant agents for patients with VTE.