Do paediatric patient-related factors affect the need for a dental general anaesthetic?

Aims The aims were to determine the profile of patients referred for treatment with dental general anaesthetic (DGA) and identify patient-related factors that contributed to a child requiring a DGA.Design setting In total, 42 patients were recruited from new patient assessment clinics at the Edinburgh Dental Institute, Scotland. Prospective questionnaires were given to the patients' caregivers with questions regarding their child's dental anxiety level, ethnicity, level of English spoken and languages spoken at home. Height and weight (BMI) measurements were taken and other information (age, sex, medical history status and postcode for level of social deprivation) were collected from their medical records.Results Compared to the local population, children referred for treatment with DGA had a significantly decreased level of English (p = 0.0001) with an increase in non-English languages at home (p = 0.0004). Patients from minority ethnic groups (p = 0.008) and children from socially deprived areas (p = 0.0001) were significantly overrepresented. Self-reported dental anxiety was high and more common in primary than secondary school-aged children (p = 0.039).Conclusions This study highlighted several patient-related variables that may increase the likelihood of DGA treatment. Further work is required to confirm these associations and develop interventions to reduce the number of children requiring DGAs.

Are developmentally missing teeth a predictive risk marker of malignant diseases in non-syndromic individuals? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Different genes and loci that are associated with non-syndromic developmental tooth agenesis (TA) have the same causation pathway in the development of tumours including breast cancer (BC), epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), colorectal cancer (CRC) and lung cancer (LC). OBJECTIVES: To assess the link between TA and the development of cancer. SEARCH SOURCES: This registered review included a comprehensive search of electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL], LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science and Medline via Ovid) until 1 April 2020, supplemented by manual, grey literature and reference lists search. There was no restriction in term of date of publication, gender, race or type of hypodontia. DATA SELECTION: The primary outcome was the relationship between TA and cancer. The secondary outcome was to identify the genetic correlation between TA and cancer. DATA EXTRACTION: Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently and induplicate by two reviewers, with disputes resolved by a third reviewer. RESULTS: Eight studies with a moderate-high risk of bias were included in the final review, with a total of 5821 participants. Due to the heterogeneity among the included studies, the data were presented narratively. Limited studies reported a high prevalence of EOC (19.2%-20%) and CRC (82%-100%) in individuals with TA (depending on the study) compared to those without TA (3% for EOC and 0% for CRC). While others reported a weak correlation between EOC and CRC and TA (P > 0.05). Weak evidence suggested a strong correlation between breast, cervical uterine and prostate cancers and TA (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Though low-quality evidence suggests a link between TA and cancer, it was not possible to verify that TA can hold a predictive value as a marker for cancers. Further research is needed to confirm the association. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020139751).

Service evaluation of the paediatric dental general anaesthesia service in NHS Lothian.

Objective To gain insight into the reasons for children undergoing dental treatment under general anaesthesia in NHS Lothian.Methods This service evaluation was based on a representative sample size of 294 patients, randomly selected from the 1,236 children seen for dental general anaesthesia (DGA) during 2017 in NHS Lothian. Data on patient and treatment descriptors were collected retrospectively from clinical records and analysed to identify significant correlations.Results The data indicated paediatric DGAs were mostly provided due to dental caries (88%, 260/294) and for children from the most deprived areas of Lothian. Most children were referred because they were of a very young age or had needs which precluded treatment under local anaesthesia (LA). Almost every child had teeth extracted under DGA (99%, 290/294) and a third of children received restorations (33%, 96/294).Discussion and conclusion This study highlighted the disproportionate increased risk of dental caries and DGA in children from more deprived backgrounds, despite a nationwide reduction of children with caries experience. There is a need for more holistic, whole-system approaches to reduce child dental caries, with opportunities for collaborative work with local stakeholders to follow-up children who have had DGA. More research is needed locally and nationally to inform the translation of evidence into effective interventions.

Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.

BACKGROUND: Crowns for primary molars are preformed and come in a variety of sizes and materials to be placed over decayed or developmentally defective teeth. They can be made completely of stainless steel (know as 'preformed metal crowns' or PMCs), or to give better aesthetics, may be made of stainless steel with a white veneer cover or made wholly of a white ceramic material. In most cases, teeth are trimmed for the crowns to be fitted conventionally using a local anaesthetic. However, in the case of the Hall Technique, PMCs are pushed over the tooth with no local anaesthetic, carious tissue removal or tooth preparation. Crowns are recommended for restoring primary molar teeth that have had a pulp treatment, are very decayed or are badly broken down. However, few dental practitioners use them in clinical practice. This review updates the original review published in 2007. OBJECTIVES: Primary objectiveTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of all types of preformed crowns for restoring primary teeth compared with conventional filling materials (such as amalgam, composite, glass ionomer, resin modified glass ionomer and compomers), other types of crowns or methods of crown placement, non-restorative caries treatment or no treatment. Secondary objectiveTo explore whether the extent of decay has an effect on the clinical outcome of primary teeth restored with all types of preformed crowns compared with those restored with conventional filling materials. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 21 January 2015), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library, 2014, Issue 12), MEDLINE via Ovid (1946 to 21 January 2015) and EMBASE via Ovid (1980 to 21 January 2015). We searched the US National Institutes of Health Trials Register (http://clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials and Open Grey for grey literature (to 21 January 2015). No restrictions were placed on the language or date of publication when searching the databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effectiveness of crowns compared with fillings, other types of crowns, non-restorative approaches or no treatment in children with untreated tooth decay in one or more primary molar teeth. We would also have included trials comparing different methods of fitting crowns.For trials to be considered for this review, the success or failure of the interventions and other clinical outcomes had to be reported at least six months after intervention (with the exception of 'pain/discomfort during treatment and immediately postoperatively'). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the title and abstracts for each article from the search results. and independently assessed the full text for each potentially relevant study. At least two authors assessed risk of bias and extracted data using a piloted data extraction form. MAIN RESULTS: We included five studies that evaluated three comparisons. Four studies compared crowns with fillings; two of them compared conventional PMCs with open sandwich restorations, and two compared PMCs fitted using the Hall Technique with fillings. One of these studies included a third arm, which allowed the comparison of PMCs (fitted using the Hall Technique) versus non-restorative caries treatment. In the two studies using crowns fitted using the conventional method, all teeth had undergone pulpotomy prior to the crown being placed. The final study compared two different types of crowns: PMCs versus aesthetic stainless steel crowns with white veneers. No RCT evidence was found that compared different methods of fitting preformed metal crowns (i.e. Hall Technique versus conventional technique).We considered outcomes reported at the dental appointment or within 24 hours of it, and in the short term (less than 12 months) or long term (12 months or more). Some of our outcomes of interest were not measured in the studies: time to restoration failure or retreatment, patient satisfaction and costs. Crowns versus fillingsAll studies in this comparison used PMCs. One study reported outcomes in the short term and found no reports of major failure or pain in either group. There was moderate quality evidence that the risk of major failure was lower in the crowns group in the long term (risk ratio (RR) 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.56; 346 teeth in three studies, one conventional and two using Hall Technique). Similarly, there was moderate quality evidence that the risk of pain was lower in the long term for the crown group (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.67; 312 teeth in two studies).Discomfort associated with the procedure was lower for crowns fitted using the Hall Technique than for fillings (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.87; 381 teeth) (moderate quality evidence).It is uncertain whether there is a clinically important difference in the risk of gingival bleeding when using crowns rather than fillings, either in the short term (RR 1.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 4.66; 226 teeth) or long term (RR 1.74, 95% CI 0.99 to 3.06; 195 teeth, two studies using PMCs with conventional technique at 12 months) (low quality evidence). Crowns versus non-restorative caries treatmentOnly one study compared PMCs (fitted with the Hall Technique) with non-restorative caries treatment; the evidence quality was very low and we are therefore we are uncertain about the estimates. Metal crowns versus aesthetic crownsOne split-mouth study (11 participants) compared PMCs versus aesthetic crowns (stainless steel with white veneers). It provided very low quality evidence so no conclusions could be drawn. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Crowns placed on primary molar teeth with carious lesions, or following pulp treatment, are likely to reduce the risk of major failure or pain in the long term compared to fillings. Crowns fitted using the Hall Technique may reduce discomfort at the time of treatment compared to fillings. The amount and quality of evidence for crowns compared to non-restorative caries, and for metal compared with aesthetic crowns, is very low. There are no RCTs comparing crowns fitted conventionally versus using the Hall Technique.

Fluoride varnish applications and caries incidence in pre-schoolers.

DESIGN: A two year placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised control trial in 1-4-year-old children. INTERVENTION: Children were recruited from low income families in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, with access to a fluoridated public water supply. Both groups received oral hygiene instruction along with provision of toothbrushes and 1450 ppm F- toothpaste. The control group had a placebo fluoride varnish applied every six months. The intervention group had 22,600 ppm F- varnish applied every six months. Clinical examinations for the presence of caries were conducted at baseline and at each subsequent six monthly visit. OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the proportion of children in each group that went on to clinically develop any new carious surfaces using the ICDAS criteria. The number of new carious surfaces was assessed as a secondary outcome, both at the enamel and dentine level. The study also reported on the safety and acceptability of the varnish. RESULTS: Two hundred children participated in the trial, 91% were followed up at two years and adherence to the six-monthly applications was 84% in the intervention and 85% in control groups. The results did not show a significant difference for the development of new lesions between the two groups. In the fluoride varnish group 36% had developed new dentinal lesions compared to 47% in the placebo group, a difference of -10.8% (95% CI -24.9 to 3.3, p = 0.14). In relation to caries increment, at the enamel level, this was a mean of 2.0 teeth in the fluoride varnish group and 2.8 teeth in the placebo group, a difference of -0.8 (95% CI -2.0 to 0.4, p = 0.19). At the dentine level, caries increment was a mean of 1.8 teeth in the fluoride varnish group and 2.5 in the placebo group, a difference of -0.7 (95% CI -1.9 to 0.4, p = 0.23). Two minor complaints related to taste and appearance of the varnish were recorded and no safety events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst no significant difference was found, the authors note that this does not indicate ineffectiveness of fluoride varnish. Re-assessment of the power calculation following study completion demonstrated that a significantly larger sample size would have been indicated, preventing the drawing of any direct conclusions from the results of this study. The use of fluoride varnish amongst this group appears to be safe and overall well tolerated.

Autotransplantation of an immature premolar, with the aid of cone beam CT and computer-aided prototyping: a case report.

UNLABELLED: Autotransplantation of immature teeth has good survival rates, and has benefits over ossointegrated implants in the growing child, but is very technique sensitive. Spiral CT imaging has been previously used in adult patients to enable computer-aided prototyping to produce a surgical template of the donor tooth, further increasing success rates. CASE REPORT: The case presented describes management of a 9-year-old girl with the combination of hypodontia affecting the upper lateral incisors as well as a severely ectopic maxillary canine. Cone beam CT was used in combination with computer-aided prototyping to produce a surgical template of an immature mandibular second premolar. The surgical template was used to prepare the transplant site before the donor tooth was extracted, greatly reducing the time from extraction to implantation. By 6 months posttransplant the tooth was clinically sound, and continued root development and laying down of dentine was visible radiographically. DISCUSSION: This paper demonstrates the use of a novel technique to aid the surgical procedure of autotransplantation of immature premolar teeth. The use of autotransplantation in this case allowed the difficult situation of two missing units in the upper left quadrant to be reduced to one unit, while retaining symmetry in the upper arch. Compared to previous studies, the use of cone beam CT to create a 3D prototype reduced radiation dose compared to spiral CT and drastically reduced the extra-oral time of the donor tooth from extraction to transplantation.