Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Semin Ophthalmol ; 37(2): 241-248, 2022 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34543164

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the limits of normal interocular symmetry and the repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) and endothelial cell morphology and density. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-eight subjects (age: 10.9-80.7 years) with healthy eyes were studied. CCT as well as endothelial cell morphology and density were measured by non-contact specular microscopy. Three measurements were obtained per eye per participant. Upper and lower tolerance limits of normal interocular symmetry were defined as the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the interocular differences in CCT, endothelial cell density (CECD), coefficient of variation (CoV), hexagonality, and cell size. Repeatability was determined using the intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC), the coefficient of variation (CV), and the test-retest variability standard deviation (TRTSD). RESULTS: The mean interocular differences were -1.05 ± 17.5 µm (p = .32) for CCT and 0.5 ± 90.8 cells/mm2 (p = .76) for CECD. The 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the interocular differences were -13.9 and 15.4 µm for CCT and -177.4 cells/mm2 to 182.0 cells/mm2 for CECD. Only interocular difference in CoV correlated weakly with age (r = -0.22, P < .001). ICCs were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96, P < .001) for CCT and 0.95 (0.94-0.96, P < .001) for CECD. CV and TRTSD were 1.2% ± 5.3% and 4.4 ± 3.4 µm for CCT and 2.4% ± 3.9% and 17.7 ± 7.7 cells/mm2 for CECD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CCT and CECD showed good repeatability and interocular symmetry in normal Congolese subjects. Absolute interocular differences in CCT and CECD exceeding 15.5 µm and 182 cells/mm2, respectively, should be considered suspicious and investigated. When comparing two intrasession measurements from the same eye, a difference of approximately 4.5 µm in CCT and 18 cells/mm2 or greater may be considered statistically significant.


Subject(s)
Cornea , Endothelium, Corneal , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cell Count , Child , Endothelial Cells , Humans , Microscopy , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
2.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 21(1): 185, 2021 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33888064

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the pachymetric and corneal endothelial cell morphometric features and their relationship to ocular and systemic factors in healthy Congolese subjects. METHODS: Non-contact specular microscopy was used in 278 healthy eyes (278 subjects) to measure central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal endothelial cell density (CECD) along with cell size, coefficient of variation (CV) in cell size, and hexagonality (HEX). The lower and upper reference limits and average values for each parameter were determined. Correlation and association of average values with anthropo-demographic and clinical variables were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age was 38.9 ± 17.2 years (10.9-80.7 years). Average values were 504.2 ± 30.7 µm (CCT), 2907.1 ± 290.9 cells/mm2 (CECD), 348.5 ± 38.4 µm2 (cell size), 32.9 ± 3.6% (CV), and 51.8 ± 7.2% (HEX). CCT was 504.9 ± 33.6 µm in men and 503.6 ± 28.3 µm in women (p = .73); values for CECD were 2917.1 ± 253.5 cells/mm2 and 2899.2 ± 317.8 cells/mm2 (p = 0.61), respectively. Lower and upper reference limits were 449.6 µm and 566.0 µm for CCT, and 2165.3 cells/mm2 and 3414.4 cells/mm2 for CECD, respectively. CCT correlated with body mass index (BMI), (r = - 0.12, P = 0.04). CECD decreased with age (r = - 0.49, P < 0.001), BMI (r = - 0.20, P = 0.001), intraocular pressure (r = - 0.13, P = 0.029) and ocular perfusion pressure (r = - 0.28, P = 0.028). CECD decayed by 8.3 cells/mm2 or 0.30% per year of age and CCT decreased by 0.72 µm per kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: Mean central cornea was thinner, CECD higher, and references limits lower than reported in other African populations. The CCT and CECD normative values reported herein will be useful for both clinical and research purposes in this population.


Subject(s)
Cornea , Endothelium, Corneal , Adult , Cell Count , Endothelial Cells , Female , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Male , Middle Aged , Tonometry, Ocular , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...