A Data-Driven Methodology to Comprehensively Assess Bone Drilling Using Radar Plots.

Background: The study aims to develop a data-driven methodology to assess bone drilling in preparation for future clinical trials in residency training. The existing assessment methods are either subjective or do not consider the interdependence among individual skill factors, such as time and accuracy. This study uses quantitative data and radar plots to visualize the balance of the selected skill factors. Methods: In the experiment, straight vertical drilling was assessed across 3 skill levels: expert surgeons (N = 10), intermediate residents (postgraduate year-2-5, N = 5), and novice residents (postgraduate year-1, N = 10). Motion and force were measured for each drilling trial, and data from multiple trials were then converted into 5 performance indicators, including overshoot, drilling time, overshoot consistency, time consistency, and force fluctuation. Each indicator was then scored between 0 and 10, with 10 being the best, and plotted into a radar plot. Results: Statistical difference (p < 0.05) was confirmed among 3 skill levels in force, time, and overshoot data. The radar plots revealed that the novice group exhibited the most distorted pentagons compared with the well-formed pentagons observed in the case of expert participants. The intermediate group showed slight distortion that was between the expert and novice groups. Conclusion/Clinical Relevance: This research shows the utility of radar plots in drilling assessment in a comprehensive manner and lays the groundwork for a data-driven training scheme to prepare novice residents for clinical practice.

An objective assessment for bone drilling: A pilot study on vertical drilling.

The purpose of this study is to propose a quantitative assessment scheme to help with surgical bone drilling training. This pilot study gathered and compared motion and force data from expert surgeons (n = 3) and novice residents (n = 6). The experiment used three-dimensional printed bone simulants of young bone (YB) and osteoporotic bone (OB), and drilling overshoot, time, and force were measured. There was no statistically significant difference in overshoot between the two groups (p = 0.217 for YB and 0.215 for OB). The results, however, show that the experts took less time (mean = 4.01 s) than the novices (mean = 9.98 s), with a statistical difference (p = 0.003 for YB and 0.0001 for OB). In addition, the expert group performed more consistently than the novices. The force analysis further revealed that experts used a higher force to drill the first cortical section and a noticeably lower force in the second cortex to control the overshoot (approximate reduction of 5.5 N). Finally, when drilling time and overshoot distance were combined, the motion data distinguished the skill gap between expert and novice drilling; the force data provided insight into the drilling mechanism and performance outcomes. This study lays the groundwork for a data-driven training scheme to prepare novice residents for clinical practice.

Comparison of the Neer classification to the 2018 update of the Orthopedic Trauma Association/AO fracture classification for classifying proximal humerus fractures.

Background: The classification of fractures is necessary to ensure a reliable means of communication for clinical interaction, education and research. The Neer classification is the most commonly used classification for proximal humerus fractures. In 2018 the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) and the AO Foundation provided an update to the OTA/AO Fracture Classification Scheme addressing many of the concerns about the previous versions of the classification. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the rater reliability of the 2 classifications and if the classifications subjectively better characterized the fracture patterns. Methods: X-rays and CT scans of 24 proximal humerus fractures were given to 7 independent raters for classification according to the Neer and 2018 OTA/AO classification. Both full-forms and short-forms of the classifications were tested. The Fleiss Kappa statistic was used to assess inter-rater agreement and intra-rater consistency for the 2 classifications. For each case the raters subjectively commented on how well each classification was able to characterize the fracture pattern. Results: All raters graded the 2018 OTA/AO classification as good as or better than the Neer classification for an adequate description of the fracture patterns. The short-form 2018 OTA/AO classification had the most 4 rater and 5 rater agreement cases and the second most 6 rater agreement cases. The short-form Neer classification had the second most 4 rater and 5 rater agreement cases and the most 6 rater agreement cases. The full 2018 OTA/AO had the least 4, 5, or 6 rater agreement cases of all the classification systems. Inter-rater agreement was fair for the full and short form of both the Neer and 2018 OTA/AO classification. The full and short Neer classifications together with the short 2018 OTA/AO classification had moderate intra-rater consistency, while the full 2018 OTA/AO classification only had slight intra-rater consistency. Conclusions: The 2018 OTA/AO classification is equivalent in its short-form to the Neer classification in inter-rater reliability and intra-rater consistency; and is superior in its full form for characterizing specific fracture types. The low inter-rater reliability of the full 2018 OTA/AO classification is a concern that may need to be addressed in the future.

Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the long-term outcomes research gap Delphi survey.

BACKGROUND: In the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016 report on trauma care, the establishment of a National Trauma Research Action Plan to strengthen and guide future trauma research was recommended. To address this recommendation, the Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. We describe the gap analysis and high-priority research questions generated from the National Trauma Research Action Plan panel on long-term outcomes. METHODS: Experts in long-term outcomes were recruited to identify current gaps in long-term trauma outcomes research, generate research questions, and establish the priority for these questions using a consensus-driven, Delphi survey approach from February 2021 to August 2021. Panelists were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability including both military and civilian representation. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population, Intervention, Compare/Control, and Outcome model. On subsequent surveys, panelists were asked to prioritize each research question on a 9-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. Consensus was defined as ≥60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category. RESULTS: Thirty-two subject matter experts generated 482 questions in 17 long-term outcome topic areas. By Round 3 of the Delphi, 359 questions (75%) reached consensus, of which 107 (30%) were determined to be high priority, 252 (70%) medium priority, and 0 (0%) low priority. Substance abuse and pain was the topic area with the highest number of questions. Health services (not including mental health or rehabilitation) (64%), mental health (46%), and geriatric population (43%) were the topic areas with the highest proportion of high-priority questions. CONCLUSION: This Delphi gap analysis of long-term trauma outcomes research identified 107 high-priority research questions that will help guide investigators in future long-term outcomes research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV.

Reformatting of Computed Tomography Scans Parallel to the S1 End Plate Increases Visualization of Trans Sacral Pathway in the First Sacral Segment, Especially With Dysmorphism.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether reformatted computed tomography (CT) scans would increase surgeons' confidence in placing a trans sacral (TS) screw in the first sacral segment. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: There were 50 patients with uninjured pelvises who were reviewed by 9 orthopaedic trauma fellowship-trained surgeons and 5 orthopaedic residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The overall percentage of surgeons who believe it was safe to place a TS screw in the first sacral segment with standard (axial cuts perpendicular to the scanner gantry) versus reformatted (parallel to the S1 end plate) CT scans. RESULTS: Overall, 58% of patients were believed to have a safe corridor in traditional cut axial CT scans, whereas 68% were believed to have a safe corridor on reformatted CT scans ( P < 0.001). When grouped by dysplasia, those without sacral dysplasia (n = 28) had a safe corridor 93% of the time on traditional scans and 93% of the time with reformatted CT scans ( P = 0.87). However, of those who had dysplasia (n = 22), only 12% were believed to have a safe corridor on original scans compared with 35% on reformatted scans ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT scan reformatting parallel to the S1 superior end plate increases the likelihood of identifying a safe corridor for a TS screw, especially in patients with evidence of sacral dysplasia. The authors would recommend the routine use of reformatting CT scans in this manner to provide a better understanding of the upper sacral segment osseous fixation pathways.

The injury characteristics of open pilon fractures predictive of complications.

OBJECTIVE: Determine predictive injury factors for wound complications in open pilon fractures (OTA/AO 43B and 43C). DESIGN: Retrospective Case Series. SETTING: Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 61 open pilon fractures in 60 patients were evaluated after meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. INTERVENTION: The majority of injuries underwent a staged protocol with immediate antibiotics, debridement, irrigation and external fixation. Following soft tissue stabilization, internal fixation was performed and wound closure achieved in a coordinated fashion depending on the type of closure required. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Early amputation rate, 90-day major (wound dehiscence or deep infection requiring operative intervention) and minor (superficial infection) wound complications. RESULTS: Four patients incurred early amputations, 11 had major wound complications and 5 had minor wound complications. An early amputation was more likely if they presented with an OTA Open Fracture Classification (OTA-OFC) Bone Loss Grade 3. A major wound complication was more likely if they presented with a fall from > 3 m, a multifragmentary articular surface, a segmental fibula fracture, or an OTA-OFC Contamination Grade 3. A multifragmentary articular surface was also predictive of developing any wound complication. CONCLUSIONS: Open pilon fractures are severe, limb-threatening injuries and are at risk for wound complications. Patients presenting with these injuries and a predictive factor should be counseled regarding the possibility of early limb loss or experiencing a wound complication that will require additional treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Competitive Orthopaedic Trauma Fellowship Applicant: A Program Director's Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, orthopaedic trauma had the lowest match rate among orthopaedic subspecialties. The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of factors evaluated by orthopaedic trauma fellowship directors when ranking applicants after the interview. METHODS: An electronic survey was submitted to fellowship directors and consisted of 16 factors included in a fellowship application. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of these factors for applicants they interviewed on a 1 to 5 Likert scale, with 1 being not at all important and 5 being critical. RESULTS: Thirty-seven fellowship directors responded (63.8%). The highest-rated factor was the applicant interview (mean score 4.82), followed by the quality of letters of recommendation (4.69), personal connections made to the applicant (3.89), and potential to be leader (3.86). Fellowship directors at academic programs rated interest in an academic career (P = 0.003), research experience (P = 0.023), and exposure to well-known orthopaedic traumatologists (P = 0.003) higher than their counterparts at private institutions. Programs with more than one fellow rated potential to be a leader higher than programs with one fellow (P = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Trainees may use this study when compiling an application to optimize their chances of matching at the program of their choice.

Improvement of Orthopedic Residency Programs and Diversity: Dilemmas and Challenges, an International Perspective.

BACKGROUND: To date, little has been published comparing the structure and requirements of orthopedic training programs across multiple countries. The goal of this study was to summarize and compare the characteristics of orthopedic training programs in the U.S.A., U.K., Canada, Australia, Germany, India, China, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran. METHODS: We communicated with responders using a predetermined questionnaire regarding the national orthopedic training program requirements in each respondent's home country. Specific items of interest included the following: the structure of the residency program, the time required to become an orthopedic surgeon, whether there is a log book, whether there is a final examination prior to becoming an orthopedic surgeon, the type and extent of faculty supervision, and the nature of national in-training written exams and assessment methods. Questionnaire data were augmented by reviewing each country's publicly accessible residency training documents that are available on the web and visiting the official website of the main orthopedic association of each country. RESULTS: The syllabi consist of three elements: clinical knowledge, clinical skills, and professional skills. The skill of today's trainees predicts the quality of future orthopedic surgeons. The European Board of Orthopedics and Traumatology (EBOT) exam throughout the European Union countries should function as the European board examination in orthopedics. We must standardize many educational procedures worldwide in the same way we standardized patient safety. CONCLUSION: Considering the world's cultural and political diversity, the world is nearly unified in regards to orthopedics. The procedures (structure of the residency programs, duration of the residency programs, selection procedures, using a log book, continuous assessment and final examination) must be standardized worldwide, as implemented for patient safety. To achieve this goal, we must access and evaluate more information on the residency programs in different countries and their needs by questioning them regarding what they need and what we can do for them to make a difference.

Improved Intraoperative Fluoroscopy for Pelvic and Acetabular Surgery.

Over the past 3 decades, the evolution of pelvic and acetabular surgery has been supported by the advances in intraoperative pelvic fluoroscopic imaging technology. The new Ziehm RFD 3D C-arm unit provides routine fluoroscopic pelvic imaging but also offers rapid and high-quality real-time axial, sagittal, and coronal intraoperative imaging. This technology allows the surgeon to accurately assess fracture reduction, loose body removal, and implant locations while the patient is still under anesthesia. In this way, any necessary corrections can be performed before the patient leaves the operating room. Essentially, this technology should eliminate the need for revision surgeries. In this report, we present our initial experience using this new device.

Secondary Union of a Critical Segmental Femoral Defect: A Case Report.

CASE: We report the case of a 41-year-old man who sustained an open femoral shaft fracture with 10 cm of segmental bone loss in a motorcycle collision. He underwent serial irrigation and debridement procedures and intramedullary nailing of the fracture. He was lost to follow-up, but presented 9 months after the injury with abundant callus formation; at 11 months, the simple hypertrophic nonunion was treated with exchange nailing. CONCLUSION: Although unusual, secondary union of segmental femoral defects may occur. The mechanism by which this occurs is poorly understood, but is likely related to the biology of the fracture site, the effects of reaming, and the mechanics of the fixation.

Hip Fracture Nonunions: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Special Considerations in Elderly Patients.

In the United States, more than 300,000 hip fractures occur annually in the elderly population with associated significant morbidity and mortality. Both intracapsular and extracapsular hip fractures have inherent treatment challenges and therefore are at risk of nonunion complications. A systematic assessment including radiographic, metabolic, and infectious evaluations should be completed for all patients suspected of nonunion. Failed internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures is typically treated with arthroplasty, while extracapsular proximal femur nonunions may be amenable to revision internal fixation or arthroplasty. While not a classic hip fracture, bisphosphate associated subtrochanteric femur fractures affect a similar patient population and are historically difficult to treat. Atypical subtrochanteric femur fractures are at increased risk of nonunion given the altered biologic environment secondary to bisphosphonate use; therefore adjuvant therapies may be beneficial in setting of revision fixation. Having a thorough understanding of nonunion risks, recognition, evaluation, and treatment is necessary for appropriate patient care.

External validation of the clinical indications of computed tomography (CT) of the head in patients with low-energy geriatric hip fractures.

INTRODUCTION: On evaluation of the clinical indications of computed tomography (CT) scan of head in the patients with low-energy geriatric hip fractures, Maniar et al. identified physical evidence of head injury, new onset confusion, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)<15 as predictive risk factors for acute findings on CT scan. The goal of the present study was to validate these three criteria as predictive risk factors for a larger population in a wider geographical distribution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥65 years of age with low-energy hip fractures from 6 trauma centers in a wide geographical distribution in the United States were included in this study. In addition to the relevant patient demographic findings, the above mentioned three criteria and acute findings on head CT scan were gathered as categorical variables. RESULTS: In total 799 patients from 6 centers were included in the study. There were 67 patients (8.3%) with positive acute findings on head CT scan. All of these patients (100%) had at least one criteria positive. There were 732 patients who had negative acute findings on head CT scan with 376 patients (51%) having at least one criteria positive and 356 patients (49%) having no criteria positive. Sensitivity of 100% and negative predictive value of 100% was observed to predict negative acute findings on head CT scan when all the three criteria were negative. CONCLUSION: With the observed 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value, physical evidence of acute head injury, acute retrograde amnesia, and GCS<15 can be recommended as a clinical decision guide for the selective use of head CT scans in geriatric patients with low energy hip fractures. All the patients with positive acute head CT findings can be predicted in the presence of at least one positive criterion. In addition, if these criteria are used as a pre-requisite to order the head CT, around 50% of the unnecessary head CT scans can be avoided.

The Core Competencies for General Orthopaedic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: With the changing delivery of orthopaedic surgical care, there is a need to define the knowledge and competencies that are expected of an orthopaedist providing general and/or acute orthopaedic care. This article provides a proposal for the knowledge and competencies needed for an orthopaedist to practice general and/or acute care orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: Using the modified Delphi method, the General Orthopaedic Competency Task Force consisting of stakeholders associated with general orthopaedic practice has proposed the core knowledge and competencies that should be maintained by orthopaedists who practice emergency and general orthopaedic surgery. RESULTS: For relevancy to clinical practice, 2 basic sets of competencies were established. The assessment competencies pertain to the general knowledge needed to evaluate, investigate, and determine an overall management plan. The management competencies are generally procedural in nature and are divided into 2 groups. For the Management 1 group, the orthopaedist should be competent to provide definitive care including assessment, investigation, initial or emergency care, operative or nonoperative care, and follow-up. For the Management 2 group, the orthopaedist should be competent to assess, investigate, and commence timely non-emergency or emergency care and then either transfer the patient to the appropriate subspecialist's care or provide definitive care based on the urgency of care, exceptional practice circumstance, or individual's higher training. This may include some higher-level procedures usually performed by a subspecialist, but are consistent with one's practice based on experience, practice environment, and/or specialty interest. CONCLUSIONS: These competencies are the first step in defining the practice of general orthopaedic surgery including acute orthopaedic care. Further validation and discussion among educators, general orthopaedic surgeons, and subspecialists will ensure that these are relevant to clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These competencies provide many stakeholders, including orthopaedic educators and orthopaedists, with what may be the minimum knowledge and competencies necessary to deliver acute and general orthopaedic care. This document is the first step in defining a practice-based standard for training programs and certification groups.

Early Mechanical Failures of the Synthes Variable Angle Locking Distal Femur Plate.

OBJECTIVES: To document the high failure rate of a specific implant: the Synthes Variable Angle (VA) Locking Distal Femur Plate. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Urban University Level I Trauma Center. PATIENT/PARTICIPANTS: All distal femur fractures (OTA/AO 33-A, B, C) treated from March 2011 through August 2013 were reviewed from our institutional orthopaedic trauma registry. Inclusion criteria were fractures treated with a precontoured distal femoral locking plate and age between 18 and 84. Exclusion criteria were fractures treated with intramedullary nails, arthroplasty, non-precontoured plates, dual plating, or screw fixation alone. The population was divided into 3 groups: less invasive stabilization system (LISS) group (n = 21), treated with LISS plates (Synthes, Paoli, PA); locking condylar plates (LCPs) group (n = 10), treated with LCPs (Synthes, Paoli, PA); and VA group (n = 36), treated with VA distal femoral LCPs (Synthes, Paoli, PA). Average age was 54.6 ± 17.5 years. INTERVENTION: Open reduction internal fixation with one of the above implants was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The patients were followed radiographically for early mechanical implant failure defined as loosening of locking screws, loss of fixation, plate bending, or implant failure. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between groups for age, gender, open fracture, mechanism of injury, or medial comminution. There were 3 failures (14.3%) in group LISS, no failures (0%) in group LCP, and 8 failures (22.2%) in group VA. All 3 failures in group LISS were in A-type fractures (2 periprosthetic) and all failures in group VA were in C-type fractures. When all fractures for all 3 groups were compared for failure rate, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.23). However, when only 33-C fractures were compared, there was significantly greater failure rate in the VA group (P = 0.03). The mean time to failure in group VA was 147 days (range 24-401 days) and was significantly earlier (P = 0.034) when compared with group LISS (mean 356 days; range 251-433 days). CONCLUSIONS: Early mechanical failure with the VA distal femoral locking plate is higher than traditional locking plates (LCP and LISS) for OTA/AO 33-C fractures. We caution practicing surgeons against the use of this plate for metaphyseal fragmented distal femur fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Musculoskeletal function assessment outcomes scores over time for tibial plafond (OTA/AO 43) and proximal humeral (OTA/AO 11) fractures: a pilot project.

OBJECTIVES: What is the return to function after an isolated proximal humerus or tibial plafond fracture? DESIGN: Prospective observational. SETTING: Orthopaedic outpatient clinics. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients were enrolled with isolated proximal humerus (N = 155) and tibial plafond fractures (N = 120). INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Musculoskeletal Function Assessment. RESULTS: Patients who sustained isolated proximal humerus or tibial plafond fractures showed gradual improvement over 1 year. Women consistently demonstrated greater dysfunction than men at 6, 9, and 12 months after tibial plafond fracture. Age had an impact on return to function after injury for both fractures. Younger patients (18-29 years) with either type of injury tended to have better scores compared with the older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed analysis of this data demonstrates variation in patient-based outcomes during recovery from a proximal humerus or tibial plafond fracture. These data need to be reviewed in the context of the individual patient when following a patient's recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.