Randomized, double-blind pilot study of transendocardial injection of autologous aldehyde dehydrogenase-bright stem cells in patients with ischemic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The optimal type of stem cell for use in patients with ischemic heart disease has not been determined. A primitive population of bone marrow-derived hematopoietic cells has been isolated by the presence of the enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase and comprises a multilineage mix of stem and progenitor cells. Aldehyde dehydrogenase-bright (ALDH(br)) cells have shown promise in promoting angiogenesis and providing perfusion benefits in preclinical ischemia studies. We hypothesize that ALDH(br) cells may be beneficial in treating ischemic heart disease and thus conducted the first randomized, controlled, double-blind study to assess the safety of the transendocardial injection of autologous ALDH(br) cells isolated from the bone marrow in patients with advanced ischemic heart failure. METHODS: Aldehyde dehydrogenase-bright cells were isolated from patients' bone marrow on the basis of the expression of a functional (aldehyde dehydrogenase) marker. We enrolled 20 patients (treatment, n = 10; control, n = 10). Safety (primary end point) and efficacy (secondary end point) were assessed at 6 months. RESULTS: No major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events occurred in ALDH(br)-treated patients in the periprocedural period (up to 1 month); electromechanical mapping-related ventricular tachycardia (n = 2) and fibrillation (n = 1) occurred in control patients. Aldehyde dehydrogenase-bright-treated patients showed a significant decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months (P = .04) and a trend toward improved maximal oxygen consumption. The single photon emission computed tomography delta analysis showed a trend toward significant improvement in reversibility in cell-treated patients (P = .053). CONCLUSIONS: We provide preliminary evidence that treatment with the novel cell population, ALDH(br) cells, is safe and may provide perfusion and functional benefits in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia.

Incidence and distribution of pathogens in early-onset neonatal sepsis in the era of antenatal antibiotics.

In 2001 France issued a new set of guidelines for the use of antenatal antibiotics (AA). These guidelines recommended intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis (IAP) to prevent group B streptococcal (GBS) disease and AA to prolong pregnancy in the event of preterm premature rupture of membranes (AA for PPROM). This study aims to determine the effects of AA, recommended by national guidelines, on the incidence and distribution of pathogens in early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS). We performed a population-based, prospective, observational study of level II and III perinatal centres throughout the region of Alsace, a northeastern area of France, between March 2004 and February 2005. The study population included all neonates with confirmed or probable EONS, who were treated with antibiotics for at least 5 days. We analysed exposure to AA, as well as clinical and microbiological data obtained from medical records. A total of 20 131 neonates were born during the study period, and 217 were included in the study. Of these, 24 subjects had confirmed sepsis, 140 had probable sepsis and 53 had possible EONS. The overall incidence of confirmed EONS was 1.19 per 1000 births. The infecting bacteria was GBS in 15 of 24 (62.5%) confirmed EONS cases (incidence: 0.75 per 1000 births) and in 81 of 140 (58%) probable sepsis cases. Escherichia coli was identified in 6 of 24 (25%) cases of confirmed EONS (incidence: 0.3 per 1000 births) and in 30 of 140 (21%) cases of clinical sepsis. Among E. coli infections (n= 36), amoxicillin resistance (n= 18) was statistically linked with AA use (P = 0.045). This link was significant in cases of PPROM (P = 0.015), but not when IAP was administered to prevent GBS disease (P = 0.264). IAP was not performed in 18 of 60 (30%) cases and 32 of 93 (34%) cases, despite positive screening or the presence of risk factors for EONS, respectively. Group B streptococcus remains the predominant pathogen in the era of AA. Aminopenicillin-resistant E. coli infections seem to be linked to prolonged AA in cases of PPROM and appear to preferentially affect preterm infants. Therefore, postnatal treatment strategies should consider this possible effect. Our data indicate that the current policy of GBS maternal prophylaxis is not associated with an excessive risk of pathogen resistance. Considering the high incidence of GBS EONS in our region, possible progress could result from better observance of guidelines. These results strengthen the need for continuation of surveillance.

Bone marrow-derived aldehyde dehydrogenase-bright stem and progenitor cells for ischemic repair.

Adult stem cell populations selected for use in cardiovascular clinical trials typically are mononuclear cell fractions of bone marrow and peripheral blood or cells of specific cell lineages selected by surface markers such as CD34 or CD133. This article describes a potent stem and progenitor cell population identified by an intracellular marker of "stemness" that crosses multiple lineages. Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)-bright (ALDH(br)) populations isolated from bone marrow contain potent stem and progenitor cells representing all cell types thought to be needed for ischemic repair and include hematopoietic, endothelial, mesenchymal, and neural progenitor cells. An animal model of hindlimb ischemia demonstrated that the ALDH(br) population was highly effective in restoring blood flow to ischemic limbs. Based upon the accumulating evidence for a potential therapeutic effect of bone marrow-derived cells in ischemic disease in humans and the vascular regenerative potential of ALDH(br) cells in the hindlimb model, clinical trials to investigate the use of autologous bone marrow-derived ALDH(br) cells in patients with ischemic heart failure and critical limb ischemia were initiated. Study designs are described. Results of the completed study in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) are encouraging and are summarized. Results of 6-month follow-up for the study in ischemic heart failure are pending.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of a combination tablet of niacin extended release and simvastatin vs simvastatin monotherapy in patients with increased non-HDL cholesterol (from the SEACOAST I study).

The efficacy and safety of 2 regimens of a combination of a proprietary niacin extended release plus simvastatin (NER/S; 1,000/20 and 2,000/20 mg/day) were compared with simvastatin monotherapy (20 mg/day) for 24 weeks in 319 high-risk patients with predominantly mixed dyslipidemia who were already at National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III risk-adjusted goals for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. After a run-in on simvastatin 20 mg/day, both NER/S doses (1,000/20 and 2,000/20 mg/day) resulted in greater decreases in non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol vs simvastatin 20 mg/day (-13.9% and -22.5% vs -7.4%, respectively; p <0.01). Significant improvements in HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein(a), and total/HDL cholesterol ratio were also observed. Patients with hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides > or =200 mg/dl) typically had greater lipid responses to NER/S with the notable exception that HDL cholesterol responses to NER/S were similar in those with or without increased triglycerides. Treatment with both doses of NER/S was well tolerated; < or =60% of patients in any treatment group experienced flushing, >90% of flushing was mild or moderate in intensity, and only 7.5% of patients in both NER/S treatment groups discontinued because of flushing. The safety of NER/S was consistent with the safety profile of each individual component. In conclusion, this study showed that NER/S provided additional clinically relevant improvements in multiple lipid parameters and was safe and well tolerated.

Long-term safety and efficacy of a combination of niacin extended release and simvastatin in patients with dyslipidemia: the OCEANS study.

INTRODUCTION: High-dose HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) fail to prevent approximately two-thirds of cardiovascular events. This fact has focused increased attention on treating abnormalities of non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C), HDL-C, and triglycerides in national guidelines and has intensified interest in combination therapy. METHODS: The OCEANS study (Open-label evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a Combination of niacin ER and simvAstatin in patieNts with dySlipidemia; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00080275) evaluated the safety and efficacy of a combination of niacin extended release and simvastatin (NER/S; SIMCOR) over 52 weeks in 520 patients with mixed dyslipidemia. After a >or=4-week run-in phase of diet modification and simvastatin 40 mg/day, median baseline values (mg/dL) were: non-HDL-C = 141, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) = 110, HDL-C = 45, and triglyceride = 151. Patients were randomized to an 8- or 12-week niacin titration scheme to a maximum NER/S dosage of 2,000/40 mg/day. RESULTS: Differences between titration groups in tolerability, safety, and efficacy were minimal; therefore, all results are for pooled titration groups. The safety of NER/S was consistent with the safety profile of each individual component. Treatment with NER/S was well tolerated: 71% of patients experienced flushing and 92% of flushing episodes were mild or moderate in intensity. Overall, 61% of patients experienced flushing episodes that were rated as mild or moderate in intensity. Flushing decreased over time: <40% of those who had flushing during titration experienced flushing during the final 12 weeks. A total of 20% of patients discontinued treatment because of a treatment-related adverse event, including 7% who discontinued because of flushing. Median changes from baseline (following the simvastatin 40 mg/day run-in phase) to 24 weeks were: non-HDL-C = -27.3%, LDL-C = -25.0%, HDL-C = +23.9%, and triglycerides = -35.9% (all p < 0.0001 vs baseline). In lipid-treatment-naive patients, NER/S 2,000/40 mg/day decreased non-HDL-C, LDL-C, and triglycerides by approximately 50% and increased HDL-C by approximately 25% when week-24 lipid values were compared with lipid values obtained prior to the simvastatin 40 mg/day run-in. All three therapeutic lipid targets (LDL-C [risk-adjusted goal], HDL-C >or=40 mg/dL, and triglycerides <150 mg/dL) were achieved concurrently by 65% of patients treated with NER/S. CONCLUSION: Treatment with NER/S 2,000/40 mg/day is well tolerated, has no unanticipated adverse events, and provides additional, clinically relevant improvements in multiple lipid parameters beyond statin monotherapy.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a combination tablet of niacin extended-release and simvastatin with simvastatin 80 mg monotherapy: the SEACOAST II (high-dose) study.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients with multiple lipid abnormalities is increasing. Lipid treatment guidelines are established for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C). The importance of treating HDL-C and triglycerides is gaining recognition. OBJECTIVE: To determine, in patients who had been treated previously with simvastatin 40 mg/day, the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of two regimens of a combination of proprietary niacin, extended-release core, coated with 40 mg/day simvastatin (NER/S), compared to 80 mg/day simvastatin monotherapy (S80). METHODS: High-risk patients (n = 343) with dyslipidemia were treated for 24 weeks with NER/S (1000/40 mg/day or 2000/40 mg/day) or S80. RESULTS: Median percentage change from baseline to week 24 in non-HDL-C in either NER/S group was noninferior to S80 (-11.3%, -17.1%, and -10.1%, respectively). Changes in LDL-C were comparable (-8.6%, -11.6%, and -12.7%, respectively). Doubling the dose of simvastatin (S80) did not alter HDL-C, triglycerides, or lipoprotein(a); however, both NER/S doses resulted in significant improvements in all three parameters (+21.9%, -31.8%, and -21.0%, respectively, for NER/S 2000/40 mg/day). The safety of NER/S was consistent with the safety profile of each individual component. Treatment with both doses of NER/S was well tolerated; 59% of patients experienced flushing, 78% of flushing was mild or moderate in intensity, 49% of those who flushed during dose titration did not flush during weeks 13 to 24, and only 4.6% of patients discontinued because of flushing. CONCLUSION: NER/S provides similar reductions in non-HDL-C and LDL-C compared to doubling the simvastatin dose to 80 mg; however, only NER/S resulted in improvements in HDL-C, triglycerides, and lipoprotein(a).

Metabolism and transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions of the endothelin-A receptor antagonist CI-1034.

CI-1034, an endothelin-A receptor antagonist was being developed for pulmonary hypertension. Drug-drug interaction studies using human hepatic microsomes were conducted to assess CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 inhibition potential; CYP3A4 induction potential was evaluated using primary human hepatocytes. CI-1034 moderately inhibited CYP2C9 (IC(50) 39.6 microM) and CYP3A4 activity (IC(50) 21.6 microM); CYP3A4 inhibition was metabolism-dependent. In human hepatocytes, no increase in CYP3A4 activity was observed in vitro, while mRNA was induced 15-fold, similar to rifampin, indicating that CI-1034 is both an inhibitor and inducer of CYP3A4. A 2-week clinical study was conducted to assess pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety. No significant changes were observed in [formula: see text] between days 1 and 14. However, reversible elevations of serum liver enzymes were observed with a 50mg BID dose and the program was terminated. To further understand the interactions of CI-1034 in the liver and possible mechanisms of the observed hepatotoxicity, we evaluated the effect of CI-1034 on bile acid transport and previously reported that CI-1034 inhibited biliary efflux of taurocholate by 60%, in vitro. This indicated that inhibition of major hepatic transporters could be involved in the observed hepatotoxicity. We next evaluated the in vitro inhibition potential of CI-1034 with the major hepatic transporters OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OATP2B1, MDR1, MRP2 and OCT. CI-1034 inhibited OATP1B1 (K(i) 2 microM), OATP1B3 (K(i) 1.8 microM) and OATP2B1 activity (K(i) 3.3 microM) but not OCT, MDR1 or MRP2 mediated transport. Our data indicates that CI-1034 is an inhibitor of major hepatic transporters and inhibition of bile efflux may have contributed to the observed clinical hepatotoxicity. We recommend that in vitro drug-drug interaction panels include inhibition and induction studies with transporters and drug metabolizing enzymes, to more completely assess potential in vivo interactions or toxicity.