Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Immunol ; 184(1): 26-9, 2010 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19949081

ABSTRACT

Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most important APC. It was recently reported that there is a dichotomy for Ag presentation by DC subsets; exogenous Ags reach the MHC class I pathway, but not the MHC class II pathway, in CD8(+) DCs, whereas CD8(-) DCs only process Ags for the MHC class II pathway. In this study, we used virus-like particles (VLPs) to show that CD8(+) and CD8(-) DCs efficiently capture and process VLPs for presentation in association with MHC class II in vivo. In contrast, CD8(+) DCs, but not CD8(-) DCs, cross presented VLP-derived peptides. This pattern was changed in an FcgammaR-dependent fashion in the presence of VLP-specific Abs, because under those conditions both DC subsets failed to efficiently cross present. Thus, the presentation of viral particles to CD4(+) T cells is not restricted to distinct DC subsets, whereas the presentation of viral particles to CD8(+) T cells is limited to CD8(+) DCs.


Subject(s)
Antigen Presentation/immunology , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/immunology , Virion/immunology , Animals , Antigens, Viral/immunology , CD8 Antigens/immunology , Cross-Priming/immunology , Flow Cytometry , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL
2.
Eur J Immunol ; 40(1): 103-12, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19877013

ABSTRACT

Innate stimuli, such as TLR ligands, are known to greatly facilitate cross-priming. Currently it is unclear whether innate stimuli enhance cross-priming at the level of cross-presentation or at the level of T-cell priming. In this study, we addressed this question by measuring cross-presentation as well as cross-priming by virus-like particles (VLP) displaying peptide p33 derived of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. Innate stimuli were varied by either packaging different TLR ligands into virus-like particles or using mice deficient in two key molecules of TLR-signaling, namely the adaptor molecule MyD88 as well as IFN-alpha/beta receptor. While efficient cross-presentation occurred despite strongly reduced activation of DC in the absence of TLR ligand-mediated signals, T-cell priming was abolished. Thus, innate stimuli regulate cross-priming at the level of DC licensing for T-cell activation and not antigen presentation.


Subject(s)
Cross-Priming , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Immunity, Innate , Signal Transduction , Animals , Antigen Presentation , Dendritic Cells/metabolism , Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus/immunology , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Microscopy, Electron , Toll-Like Receptors/immunology , Toll-Like Receptors/metabolism , Viral Proteins/immunology , Virion/immunology , Virion/ultrastructure
3.
Nature ; 460(7251): 108-12, 2009 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19543266

ABSTRACT

Memory CD8 T cells are a critical component of protective immunity, and inducing effective memory T-cell responses is a major goal of vaccines against chronic infections and tumours. Considerable effort has gone into designing vaccine regimens that will increase the magnitude of the memory response, but there has been minimal emphasis on developing strategies to improve the functional qualities of memory T cells. Here we show that mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin, also known as FRAP1) is a major regulator of memory CD8 T-cell differentiation, and in contrast to what we expected, the immunosuppressive drug rapamycin has immunostimulatory effects on the generation of memory CD8 T cells. Treatment of mice with rapamycin following acute lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection enhanced not only the quantity but also the quality of virus-specific CD8 T cells. Similar effects were seen after immunization of mice with a vaccine based on non-replicating virus-like particles. In addition, rapamycin treatment also enhanced memory T-cell responses in non-human primates following vaccination with modified vaccinia virus Ankara. Rapamycin was effective during both the expansion and contraction phases of the T-cell response; during the expansion phase it increased the number of memory precursors, and during the contraction phase (effector to memory transition) it accelerated the memory T-cell differentiation program. Experiments using RNA interference to inhibit expression of mTOR, raptor (also known as 4932417H02Rik) or FKBP12 (also known as FKBP1A) in antigen-specific CD8 T cells showed that mTOR acts intrinsically through the mTORC1 (mTOR complex 1) pathway to regulate memory T-cell differentiation. Thus these studies identify a molecular pathway regulating memory formation and provide an effective strategy for improving the functional qualities of vaccine- or infection-induced memory T cells.


Subject(s)
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/cytology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Cell Differentiation , Immunologic Memory/immunology , Protein Kinases/metabolism , Animals , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Cells, Cultured , Immunologic Memory/drug effects , Lymphocyte Count , Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus/immunology , Macaca mulatta/immunology , Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Multiprotein Complexes , Proteins , Sirolimus/pharmacology , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases , Transcription Factors/metabolism
4.
J Immunol ; 182(10): 6261-6, 2009 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19414779

ABSTRACT

Viruses and virus-like particles (VLPs) are known to be potent inducers of B cell as well as Th cell and CTL responses. It is well established that professional APCs such as dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages efficiently process viral particles for both MHC class I- and MHC class II-associated presentation, which is essential for induction of CTL and Th cell responses, respectively. Less is known, however, about the ability of B cells to present epitopes derived from viral particles to T cells. Using two different VLPs, in this study we show in vitro as well as in vivo that DCs present VLP-derived peptides in association with MHC class I as well as class II. In contrast, although B cells were able to capture VLPs similarly as DCs and although they efficiently processed VLPs for presentation in association with MHC class II, they failed to process exogenous VLPs for presentation in association with MHC class I. Thus, in contrast to DCs, B cells are not involved in the process of cross-priming. This finding is of physiological importance because B cells with the ability to cross-present Ag to specific CD8(+) T cells may be killed by these cells, preventing the generation of neutralizing Ab responses.


Subject(s)
Antigen Presentation/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Cross-Priming/immunology , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/immunology , Virion/immunology , Animals , Cytotoxicity, Immunologic/immunology , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte/immunology , Flow Cytometry , Lymphocyte Activation/immunology , Lymphoid Tissue/cytology , Lymphoid Tissue/immunology , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Transgenic , T-Lymphocytes/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...