Human B-cell and progenitor stages as determined by probability state modeling of multidimensional cytometry data.

BACKGROUND: Human progenitor and B-cell development is a highly regulated process characterized by the ordered differential expression of numerous cell-surface and intracytoplasmic antigens. This study investigates the underlying coordination of these modulations by examining a series of normal bone marrow samples with the method of probability state modeling or PSM. RESULTS: The study is divided into two sections. The first section examines B-cell stages subsequent to CD19 up-regulation. The second section assesses an earlier differentiation stage before and including CD19 up-regulation. POST-CD19 ANTIGENIC UP-REGULATION: Statistical analyses of cytometry data derived from sixteen normal bone marrow specimens revealed that B cells have at least three distinct coordinated changes, forming four stages labeled as B1, B2, B3, and B4. At the end of B1; CD34 antigen expression down-regulates with TdT while CD45, CD81, and CD20 slightly up-regulate. At the end of B2, CD45 and CD20 up-regulate. At the end of B3 and beginning of B4; CD10, CD38, and CD81 down-regulate while CD22 and CD44 up-regulate. PRE-CD19 ANTIGENIC UP-REGULATION: Statistical analysis of ten normal bone marrows revealed that there are at least two measurable coordinated changes with progenitors, forming three stages labeled as P1, P2, and P3. At the end of P1, CD38 up-regulates. At the end of P2; CD19, CD10, CD81, CD22, and CD9 up-regulate while CD44 down-regulates slightly. CONCLUSIONS: These objective results yield a clearer immunophenotypic picture of the underlying cellular mechanisms that are operating in these important developmental processes. Also, unambiguously determined stages define what is meant by "normal" B-cell development and may serve as a preliminary step for the development of highly sensitive minimum residual disease detection systems. A companion article is simultaneously being published in Cytometry Part A that will explain in further detail the theory behind PSM. Three short relevant videos are available in the online supporting information for both of these papers.

Diagnostic utility of cerebrospinal fluid flow cytometry in patients with and without prior hematologic malignancy.

Flow cytometry (FCM) is an adjunct study to routine analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to investigate for involvement by a hematologic malignancy. However, in our experience, FCM only infrequently detects abnormalities in CSF. To help optimize resources without forfeiting clinically important data, we sought to determine evidence-based indications and criteria for performing FCM on CSF. FCM results of 316 consecutive CSF specimens were retrospectively reviewed and correlated with clinical history, total nucleated cell (TNC) counts, and results of concurrent cytologic review. Of 255 samples adequate for analysis, 54% were from patients with a prior history of hematologic malignancy, of which 12% (17 cases) were abnormal by FCM. Corresponding TNC counts among samples with abnormal FCM ranged from 0-1050 cells/µL, and only 44% showed abnormal morphology on concurrent cytology. Of the remaining 46% of samples from patients with no known history of hematologic malignancy who had CSF sampling for neurological indications, only one (1%) was abnormal by FCM. This specimen had an elevated TNC count (39 cells/µL) but lacked clearly abnormal findings on concurrent cytology. These results support the use of CSF FCM only in patients with a history of hematologic malignancy or, in the absence of such a history, in samples showing pleocytosis. If these criteria were applied to the current cohort using a TNC count cut-off of >5 cells/µL, 23% of samples would have been deferred from testing, resulting in decreased cost, improved efficiency, and reduction in the need for unnecessary testing without a negative impact on clinical care.

Novel use of the BD FACS SPA to automate custom monoclonal antibody panel preparations for immunophenotyping.

BACKGROUND: The effective and accurate diagnosis of hematologic malignancies relies on flow cytometric immunophenotyping. Selected combinations of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) arranged in multicolor panels allow for the accurate definition of normal and abnormal hematologic cell populations. The most time-consuming and crucial step in the staining process involves dispensing combinations of multiple mAbs into their appropriate staining tubes. This step is prone to error, requires concentration and accuracy, and is dependent on technologist experience. The Becton Dickinson BioScience (BD) FACS Sample Prep Assistant (SPA) is touted as a breakthrough in automated in vitro diagnostic sample preparation. The SPA is designed to automate BD MultiTESk and BD TriTest lyse/no-wash assays. However, because most cases in our laboratory require tedious application of unique four-color mAb cocktails for leukemia and lymphoma testing, we wondered whether the SPA would be helpful in accurately dispensing these mixtures. METHODS: The mAb panels were prepared by the SPA in two separate timed runs and on separate days. Eleven specimens (nine from patients and two from normal volunteers) were split and stained with four-color cocktails created by the SPA or manually. The percentage of positive (%P) cells and mean fluorescent intensity for each mAb pair were determined. These values were plotted against each other and correlation values were calculated. To quantitate timesaving in the laboratory, two technologists prepared individually the same mAb panels and were timed. RESULTS: The correlation between the two methods was high; r(2) was 0.988 for 158 %P antigen pairs; no bias between the manual and robotic methods was detected with the Wilcoxon rank test. Bland-Altman analysis indicated no obvious relation between the difference and the mean of %P cells, suggesting that the SPA successfully dispensed antibodies for leukemia/lymphoma panels. The two methods may be interchangeable, although the limited sample size prohibits this conclusion from Bland-Altman statistics alone. In addition, one possible error was detected in the SPA-prepared panels. The SPA averaged 65 min/run, the experienced technologist 12.95 min/run, and the inexperienced technologist 54.9 min/run. CONCLUSIONS: SPA dispensing time was twice the average manual dispensing time; however, SPA use was completely automated and freed the technologist to perform other tasks. SPA use permitted preemptive preparation of mAb panels and thus streamlined processing; however, the cost of the assay and the amount of reagent waste increased. It is certain that software modifications by BD could decrease the SPA reagent dispense time and decrease the cost associated with reagent waste when the SPA is used in this novel fashion.

Differential expression of cell surface antigens on subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of relative antigen density on T cell subsets is a feature of antigen expression that is infrequently characterized. Defining phenotypic differences is a first step in understanding associated differences in function. Additionally, a better understanding of T cell heterogeneity may aid in clinical diagnoses. MATERIAL/METHODS: To further elucidate phenotypic differences of T cell subsets, and begin to determine what information relative antigen density contributes to immunology, we analyzed normal human peripheral blood T cells for a variety of immunophenotypic (CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD45RA, CD45RO, TCR alpha beta) and light scatter characteristics using 6 color flow cytometry. T-cell leukemia specimens were also analyzed. RESULTS: Our data show that statistically significant immunophenotypic differences exist between subsets of human CD4 and CD8 T cells. Normal T cells express different levels of relative antigen density for some antigens compared to malignant T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences are seen in relative antigen density for several cell surface markers between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Neither donor source nor flow cytometric calibration account for these differences. The data are applied to specimens from patients with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia to show how antigen density can be used clinically in aiding to diagnose disease. The data presented here can be used to further investigate these cell populations for functional differences.

Expression of serotherapy target antigens in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia: therapeutic applications and considerations.

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy (serotherapy) has been successfully used in the treatment of many B-cell malignancies, among them lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, an uncommon disorder that includes patients with the clinicopathological diagnosis of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). Rituximab, a mAb directed at CD20, was recently demonstrated by us and others to induce remissions and facilitate hematological recovery in patients with WM. The expression of CD20, along with targets of other mAbs which are commercially available, currently in clinical trials, or in preclinical development, have not been extensively studied or well documented in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. As such, we examined by flow cytometric analysis tumor cells from a large series of patients with the histopathlogical diagnosis of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and the clinicopathological diagnosis of WM for expression of the serotherapy target antigens CD20, CD22, CD40, CD52, IgM, MUC1 core protein, and 1D10. These studies demonstrated antigen expression on >or=50% of bone marrow tumor cells (CD19(+), kappa/lambda light chain-restricted), respectively, from patients as follows: CD20 (98.3%), CD22 (88.3%), CD40 (83.3%), CD52 (77.4%), IgM (83.3%), MUC1 core protein (57.8%), and 1D10 (50%). Both interpatient and intrapatient tumor clone antigen expression was heterogeneous. Combined mAb therapy might be a useful approach to cope with this variation, and could be tailored to target all members of the tumor clone for an individual patient.

CD20-directed serotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma: biologic considerations and therapeutic applications.

Clonotypic B cells circulating in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) express CD20, and it has been suggested that these cells may be clonogenic. Furthermore, 20% of patients with MM express CD20 on their bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs). Therefore, the authors began a phase II clinical study to determine the activity of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in MM patients. Nineteen previously treated MM patients received 375 mg/m2 rituximab per week for 4 weeks. Three months after initiation of treatment, patients were assessed for response and received a second course of therapy if their disease was stable (SD) or they achieved a partial response (PR). Six of 19 (32%) patients had either a PR (n = 1) or SD (n = 5), with a median time to treatment failure of 5.5 months (mean, 10.3 months; range, 3-27+ months). All six patients who had a PR or SD had CD20+ BMPC. Overall, rituximab therapy was well tolerated. Because most patients with MM poorly express CD20 on their BMPCs, the authors evaluated agents for their ability to induce CD20 expression and thereby facilitate rituximab binding on MM cells. These studies show that interferon-gamma (IFN-y) induced CD20 expression on MM BMPCs, MM B cells, and healthy donor BMPCs. In contrast, CD20 expression on chronic lymphocytic leukemia, follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, healthy donor B cells, and progenitor cells was unaffected by IFN-y. Rituximab binding to the BMPCs of MM patients was also increased after culture with pharmacologically attainable levels of IFN-gamma (1-100 U/mL). In conclusion, these studies suggest that MM patients with CD20+ BMPCs may benefit from rituximab therapy. Furthermore, IFN-gamma induces CD20 expression on MM BMPCs and B cells and facilitates rituximab binding to MM BMPCs, providing the rationale for clinical trials to examine its use with CD20-directed serotherapies in MM.