Strategies to guide the successful implementation of deprescribing in community practice: Lessons learned from the front line.

Background: Sustainable implementation of new professional services into clinical practice can be difficult. In 2019, a population-wide initiative called SaferMedsNL was implemented across the province of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), to promote appropriate medication use. Two evidence-based interventions were adapted to the context of NL to promote deprescribing of proton pump inhibitors and sedatives. The objective of this study was to identify and prioritize which actions supported the implementation of deprescribing in community practice for pharmacists, physicians and nurse practitioners across the province. Methods: Community pharmacists, physicians and nurse practitioners were invited to participate in virtual focus groups. Nominal Group Technique was used to elicit responses to the question: "What actions support the implementation of deprescribing into the daily workflow of your practice?" Participants prioritized actions within each group while thematic analysis permitted comparison across groups. Results: Five focus groups were held in fall 2020 involving pharmacists (n = 11), physicians (n = 7) and nurse practitioners (n = 4). Participants worked in rural (n = 10) and urban (n = 12) settings. The different groups agreed on what the top 5 actions were, with the top 5 receiving 68% of the scores: (1) providing patient education, (2) allocating time and resources, (3) building interprofessional collaboration and communication, (4) fostering patient relationships and (5) aligning with public awareness strategies. Conclusion: Pharmacists, physicians and nurse practitioners identified similar actions that supported implementing evidence-based deprescribing into routine clinical practice. Sharing these strategies may help others embed deprescribing into daily practice and assist the uptake of medication appropriateness initiatives by front-line providers. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2024;157:xx-xx.

Target users' acceptance of a pharmacist-led prescribing service for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a highly effective way to reduce virus transmission. There have been increasing calls to improve access to PrEP in Canada. One way to improve access is by having more prescribers available. The objective of this study was to determine target users' acceptance of a PrEP-prescribing service by pharmacists in Nova Scotia. Methods: A triangulation, mixed-methods study was conducted consisting of an online survey and qualitative interviews underpinned by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) constructs (affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity cost, perceived effectiveness and self-efficacy). Participants were those eligible for PrEP in Nova Scotia (men who have sex with men or transgender women, persons who inject drugs and HIV-negative individuals in serodiscordant relationships). Descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression were used to analyze survey data. Interview data were deductively coded according to each TFA construct and then inductively coded to determine themes within each construct. Results: A total of 148 responses were captured by the survey, and 15 participants were interviewed. Participants supported pharmacists' prescribing PrEP across all TFA constructs from both survey and interview data. Identified concerns related to pharmacists' abilities to order and view lab results, pharmacists' knowledge and skills for sexual health and the potential for experiencing stigma within pharmacy settings. Conclusion: A pharmacist-led PrEP-prescribing service is acceptable to eligible populations in Nova Scotia. The feasibility of PrEP prescribing by pharmacists should be pursued as an intervention to increase access to PrEP.

Community pharmacists' acceptance of prescribing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention is highly effective. Pharmacists can increase PrEP accessibility through pharmacist prescribing. This study aimed to determine pharmacists' acceptance of a pharmacist PrEP prescribing service in Nova Scotia. Methods: A triangulation mixed methods study consisting of an online survey and qualitative interviews was conducted with Nova Scotia community pharmacists. The survey questionnaire and qualitative interview guide were underpinned by the 7 constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (affective attitude, burden, ethicality, opportunity costs, intervention coherence, perceived effectiveness and self-efficacy). Survey data were analyzed descriptively and with ordinal logistic regression to determine associations between variables. Interview transcripts were deductively coded according to the same constructs and then inductively coded to identify themes within each construct. Results: A total of 214 community pharmacists completed the survey, and 19 completed the interview. Pharmacists were positive about PrEP prescribing in the constructs of affective attitude (improved access), ethicality (benefits communities), intervention coherence (practice alignment) and self-efficacy (role). Pharmacists expressed concerns about burden (increased workload), opportunity costs (time to provide the service) and perceived effectiveness (education/training, public awareness, laboratory test ordering and reimbursement). Conclusion: A PrEP prescribing service has mixed acceptability to Nova Scotia pharmacists yet represents a model of service delivery to increase PrEP access to underserved populations. Future service development must consider pharmacists' workload, education and training as well as factors relating to laboratory test ordering and reimbursement.

Barriers and enablers to testing for hepatitis C virus infection in people who inject drugs - a scoping review of the qualitative evidence.

BACKGROUND: Injection drug use is the primary mode of transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the developed world and guidelines recommend screening individuals with current or history of injection drug use for HCV; however, the majority of those living with HCV in Canada are not aware of their positive status. This low level of HCV status awareness suggests that screening is not effective with current testing strategies. The aim of this review is to determine what barriers and enablers people who inject drugs (PWID) experience surrounding testing for HCV to help inform the development of an engaging testing strategy. METHODS: Comprehensive literature searches were conducted using Medline, Embase and CINAHL in February 2021. Included studies investigated the barriers and enablers to testing for HCV in PWID and the experiences of PWID in testing for HCV. Studies were included if they were qualitative or mixed-methods design, involved people with current injection drug use or those with a history of injecting drugs, and were written in the English language. Studies were compared and common themes were coded and analyzed. RESULTS: The literature search resulted in 1554 citations and ultimately nine studies were included. Common barriers included self-perception of low risk for HCV, fear of diagnosis, stigma associated with IV drug use and HCV, antipathy in relation to mainstream health care services, limited knowledge about HCV, lack of rapport with provider, lack of motivation or competing priority of drug use, and limited awareness of new treatment options. Common enablers to testing included increasing awareness of HCV testing and treatment and providing positive narratives around HCV care, positive rapport with provider, accessible testing options and individualized care. CONCLUSION: While there has been some qualitative research on barriers and enablers to testing for HCV in PWID more research is needed to focus on this research question as a primary objective in order to provide more understanding from the participant's perspective.

Trends in Use of Combination Antiretroviral Therapy and Treatment Response from 2000 to 2016 in the Canadian Observational Cohort (CANOC): A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Background: Advances in treatment have turned HIV from a terminal illness to a more manageable condition. Over the past 20 years, there have been considerable changes to HIV treatment guidelines, including changes in preferred antiretrovirals and timing of initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Objective: To examine real-world trends in cART utilization, viral control, and immune reconstitution among people living with HIV in Canada. Methods: Data were obtained from the Canadian Observational Cohort (CANOC). CANOC participants were eligible if they were antiretroviral therapy-naive at entry and initiated 3 or more antiretrovirals on or after January 1, 2000; if they were at least 18 years of age at treatment initiation; if they were residing in Canada; and if they had at least 1 viral load determination and CD4 count within 1 year of CANOC entry. Baseline and annual mean CD4 counts were categorized as less than 200, 200-350, 351-500, and more than 500 cells/mm3. Annual mean viral loads were reported as suppressed (< 50 copies/mL), low (50-199 copies/mL), or high detectable (≥ 200 copies/mL). The cART regimens were reported yearly. Results: All CANOC participants were included (n = 13 040). Over the study period, the proportion of individuals with an annual mean CD4 count above 500 cells/mm3 increased from 16.3% to 65.8%, while the proportion of individuals with an undetectable mean viral load increased from 10.6% to 83.2%. As of 2007, the most commonly prescribed 2-agent nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone was tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine. In terms of third agents, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors were the most common class in the periods 2000-2003 and 2014-2015, protease inhibitors were most common in the period 2004-2013, and integrase inhibitors were most common in 2016. Conclusions: Concordance with treatment guidelines was demonstrated over time with respect to cART prescribing and immunologic and virologic response.

Contexte: Les progrès effectués dans le domaine des traitements ont transformé le VIH. Celui-ci est passé d'une maladie en phase terminale à une maladie plus gérable. Au cours des 20 dernières années, des changements considérables ont eu lieu dans les directives de traitement du VIH, y compris des changements dans les antirétroviraux privilégiés et le moment de l'initiation de la thérapie antirétrovirale combinée (TARc). Objectif: Examiner les tendances réelles de l'utilisation de la TARc, du contrôle viral et de la reconstitution immunitaire chez les personnes vivant avec le VIH au Canada. Méthodes: Les données ont été obtenues auprès de la Canadian Observational Cohort (CANOC). Les participants à la CANOC étaient admissibles s'ils n'avaient jamais reçu de traitement antirétroviral à l'entrée et avaient commencé la prise de 3 antirétroviraux ou plus le 1er janvier 2000 ou après cette date; s'ils avaient au moins 18 ans au moment du début du traitement; s'ils résidaient au Canada; et s'ils avaient au moins 1 charge virale et un nombre de CD4 dans l'année suivant l'entrée à la CANOC. Les numérations initiales et annuelles moyennes de CD4 ont été classées comme inférieures à 200, 200 à 350, 351 à 500, et supérieures à 500 cellules/mm3. Les charges virales moyennes annuelles ont été signalées comme supprimées (< 50 copies/mL), faibles (50 à 199 copies/mL) ou élevées détectables (≥ 200 copies/mL). Les régimes de la TARc ont été rapportés chaque année. Résultats: Tous les participants à la CANOC ont été inclus (n = 13040). Au cours de la période d'étude, la proportion de personnes ayant une numération CD4 moyenne annuelle supérieure à 500 cellules/mm3 est passée de 16,3 % à 65,8 %, tandis que la part de personnes ayant une charge virale moyenne indétectable est passée de 10,6 % à 83,2 %. En 2007, la bithérapie de base d'inhibiteurs nucléosidiques de la transcriptase inverse la plus couramment prescrite était le fumarate de ténofovir disoproxil et l'emtricitabine. En matière de troisièmes agents, la classe la plus courante dans les périodes 2000­2003 et 2014­2015 était les inhibiteurs non nucléosidiques de la transcriptase inverse; les plus courants dans la période 2004­2013 étaient les inhibiteurs de protéase; et les inhibiteurs de l'intégrase étaient les plus courants en 2016. Conclusions: La concordance avec les directives de traitement a été démontrée au fil du temps en ce qui concerne la prescription de la cART et la réponse immunologique et virologique.

Beliefs and attitudes of residents, family members and healthcare professionals regarding deprescribing in long-term care: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is prevalent among long-term care (LTC) residents and can cause significant morbidity. In 2018, we concluded a deprescribing pilot study that reduced potentially inappropriate medication use among LTC residents. AIM: We sought to understand the experience and views of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, LTC residents and family members who participated in the pilot study. METHOD: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with residents and families, a physician, pharmacist and pharmacy student, and licensed-practical nurses. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Interviews with 13 participants yielded themes in 3 categories: (1) views about medication use in LTC and willingness to engage in deprescribing, (2) perceived barriers and enablers for deprescribing, and (3) impact of participating in deprescribing study. Participants were willing to engage in deprescribing; residents were motivated by physician suggestions, and family members prioritized quality of life in decision-making and wanted to be part of the decision-making process. Solutions to overcome barriers included assigning responsibility to identify deprescribing opportunities to pharmacists, scheduling rounds to enable face-to-face team discussions, and consulting families to provide missing medical history to inform deprescribing decisions. Participating in a deprescribing intervention resulted in improved healthcare professional (HCP) confidence and interprofessional collaboration, and caused continued practice change after the study. CONCLUSION: Residents, families, and HCPs are concerned about problems associated with polypharmacy in LTC and are willing to consider deprescribing. Barriers to deprescribing in LTC exist but are not insurmountable. Results provide valuable insight into strategies to optimize deprescribing interventions within LTC.

Expanding access to HIV testing through Canadian community pharmacies: findings from the APPROACH study.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for acceptable and feasible HIV testing options to ensure people living with HIV know their status so they can access care. Pharmacist-provided HIV point-of-care testing (POCT) may overcome testing barriers, including privacy concerns, testing wait times, and improve accessibility. In the APPROACH study, we aimed to develop and assess an HIV POCT program in community pharmacies for future scale up and evaluation. This paper describes the program uptake, participant and pharmacist experiences, and implementation factors. METHODS: A pharmacist-provided HIV POCT program was offered in 4 pharmacies in two Canadian provinces. A mixed methods design incorporated self-report questionnaire data, participant telephone interviews, pharmacist focus groups, workload analysis, and situational analysis to assess the uptake, acceptability and feasibility of the HIV POCT program. RESULTS: Over the 6-month pilot, 123 HIV tests were performed. One new case of HIV was identified; this participant was linked with confirmatory testing and HIV care. Participants were predominantly male (76%), with a mean age of 35 years. This was the first HIV test for 27% participants, and 75% were at moderate to very high risk of undiagnosed HIV infection, by Denver HIV Risk Score. Questionnaires and telephone interviews showed participants were very satisfied with the program; 99% agreed HIV POCT should be routinely offered in pharmacies and 78% were willing to pay for the service. Participants felt the pharmacy was convenient, discreet, and that the pharmacist was supportive and provided education about how to reduce their future risk. Pharmacists felt prepared, confident, and expressed professional satisfaction with offering HIV POCT. Community and public health supports, clear linkage to care plans to refer participants with positive HIV POCT results, and provision of counselling tools were important enabling factors for the program. Pharmacist remuneration, integration with existing healthcare systems, and support for ongoing promotion of HIV POCT availability in pharmacies were identified as needs for future scale-up and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: A successful model of pharmacy-based POCT, including linkage to care, was developed. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this approach in finding new diagnoses and linking them with care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03210701) on July 6, 2017.

Adaptation of POCT for pharmacies to reduce risk and optimize access to care in HIV, the APPROACH study protocol: examining acceptability and feasibility.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 1 in 5 Canadians with HIV are unaware of their status. In many provinces and especially rural communities, barriers to HIV testing include lack of access, privacy concerns, and stigma. The availability of HIV point-of-care testing (POCT) is limited across Canada. Pharmacists are well positioned to address barriers by offering rapid HIV POCT and facilitating linkage to care. METHODS: We will use a type-2 hybrid implementation-effectiveness design to assess a pilot HIV POCT model in one urban and one rural pharmacy in each of two Canadian provinces over 6 months. In this feasibility trial the research aims include developing and assisting pharmacies in implementing the model, evaluating processes/determinants of program implementation, evaluating the model's effects on client outcomes, preferences, and testing satisfaction. Using a community-based research approach, the research team will engage community stakeholders in each province including individuals with lived experience to inform the development of the pharmacy-based HIV testing model and support the research team throughout the study. A multipronged promotion campaign will be used to promote the study and facilitate recruitment. The pharmacy-based testing model will include pre/post-test counseling and linkage to care plans in addition to pharmacist-administered HIV POCT. Pharmacists will complete a comprehensive training program prior to implementing the testing model. Client demographics and satisfaction will be assessed by surveys and interviews. Pharmacists will document time required for testing and participate in a post-study focus group to discuss barriers/enablers. Implementation will be assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. The process of developing and implementing the model will be described using qualitative data and a logic model. Acceptability and barriers/enablers will be examined qualitatively based on survey responses. A preliminary costing assessment will consider the client, pharmacy, and government perspectives. DISCUSSION: The results of this pilot will inform modifications to the HIV POCT model to optimize effectiveness and increase scalability. The study has national importance, providing valuable information on improving access to HIV testing. Future applications of this research may expand the role of pharmacists in offering POCT for other sexually transmitted/bloodborne infections as tests become available in Canada. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03210701.

Patient satisfaction with chronic HIV care provided through an innovative pharmacist/nurse-managed clinic and a multidisciplinary clinic.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacist/nurse-led clinics are an established model for many chronic diseases but not yet for HIV. At our centre, patients with HIV are seen by a multidisciplinary team (physician, nurse, pharmacist, social worker) at least yearly. Some attend an HIV-specialist pharmacist/nurse clinic (or "nonphysician clinic," NPC) for alternate biannual visits. Our objective was to assess patient satisfaction with care received through both clinics. METHODS: The Patient Satisfaction Survey for HIV Ambulatory Care (assesses satisfaction with access to care, clinic visits and quality of care) was administered by telephone to adults who attended either clinic between January and July 2014. Descriptive statistics described patient characteristics and satisfaction scores. Fisher's exact test compared satisfaction scores between the NPC and multidisciplinary clinic (MDC). Multivariate logistic regression examined associations between overall satisfaction with care and clinic type and patient characteristics (e.g., age, disease duration). RESULTS: Respondents were very satisfied with the overall quality of HIV care in both the NPC and MDC (89% vs 93%, respectively, p = 0.6). Patients from both clinics expressed satisfaction with access to care, treatment plan input, their provider's knowledge of the newest developments in HIV care and explanation of medication side effects, with no significant differences noted. Significantly more MDC patients reported being asked about housing/finances, alcohol/drug use and whether they needed help disclosing their status. Patient characteristics were not significantly associated with satisfaction with overall quality of care. CONCLUSION: Patients are satisfied with both clinics, supporting NPC as an innovative model for chronic HIV care. Comparison of outcomes between clinics is needed to ensure high-quality care.

Postexposure management of infectious diseases.

Anyone exposed to an infectious disease--whether a healthcare provider, patient, or contact of a patient--should be evaluated promptly and the source of the infection identified. A systematic response entails postexposure prophylactic therapy if available and indicated, infection control measures to prevent further transmission, counseling and educating those involved, and assessing those who may require work restriction or modification.

Patient attitudes regarding the role of the pharmacist and interest in expanded pharmacist services.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists are consistently ranked among the most trusted professionals, and research shows high levels of satisfaction with pharmacist services. Studies have also shown that the public is generally unaware of the full range of roles and responsibilities of a pharmacist. The purpose of this study was to explore the public's knowledge and attitudes regarding the role of the community pharmacist and to determine their likelihood of using expanded pharmacist services. METHODS: Adults across Newfoundland and Labrador were surveyed by telephone. Survey questions addressed how frequently participants visited the pharmacy, understanding of duties undertaken by pharmacists, perceptions and attitudes regarding pharmacists as health care professionals, likelihood of using expanded pharmacist services and participant demographics. Comparisons were made between responses from urban and rural participants and frequent versus nonfrequent pharmacy users, to determine if there were any differences. RESULTS: The majority of participants were generally aware of what pharmacists do when filling prescriptions; those who visited the pharmacy more frequently appeared to be more informed. Participants indicated they would take advantage of the expanded services suggested, with greatest interest in receiving advice for minor ailment management and prescription refills from pharmacists. Results support the prevailing view that pharmacists are trusted health professionals who should have access to patients' health information to provide best care. CONCLUSION: The public is aware of aspects of the pharmacist's role, but opportunities exist to better educate the public on the knowledge, skills and unique professional abilities of pharmacists to support uptake of expanded pharmacist services.

Pharmacist and physician views on collaborative practice: Findings from the community pharmaceutical care project.

BACKGROUND: Strong working relationships between pharmacists and physicians are needed to optimize patient care. Understanding attitudes and barriers to collaboration between pharmacists and physicians may help with delivery of primary health care services. The objective of this study was to capture the opinions of family physicians and community pharmacists in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) regarding collaborative practice. METHODS: Two parallel surveys were offered to all community pharmacists and family physicians in NL. Surveys assessed the following: attitudes and experience with collaborative practice, preferred communication methods, perceived role of pharmacists, areas for more collaboration and barriers to collaborative practice. Results for both groups were analyzed separately, with comparisons between groups to compare responses with similar questions. RESULTS: Survey response rates were 78.6% and 7.1% for pharmacists and physicians, respectively. Both groups overwhelmingly agreed that collaborative practice could result in improved patient outcomes and agreed that major barriers were lack of time and compensation and the need to deal with multiple pharmacists/physicians. Physicians indicated they would like more collaboration for insurance approvals and patient counselling, while pharmacists want to assist with identifying and managing patients' drug-related problems. Both groups want more collaboration to improve patient adherence. CONCLUSION: Both groups agree that collaborative practice can positively affect patient outcomes and would like more collaboration opportunities. However, physicians and pharmacists disagree about the areas where they would like to collaborate to deliver care. Changes to reimbursement models and infrastructure are needed to facilitate enhanced collaboration between pharmacists and physicians in the community setting.

Diagnosis and management of common chronic metabolic complications in HIV-infected patients.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has become a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and patient self-management education to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Metabolic complications such as dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and fat distribution abnormalities are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease is now a leading cause of death among HIV-infected patients. Lipid abnormalities, now often characteristically seen with HIV infection, include elevated triglycerides and low elevated total cholesterol (TC), and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels of total and HDL cholesterol. Many antiretroviral drugs are associated with lipid abnormalities, which commonly include hypertriglyceridemia and increased total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The management of dyslipidemia includes lifestyle modifications, lipid-lowering therapy, and switching antiretroviral therapy (ART). The increased prevalence of insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, and diabetes is multifactorial in etiology. Management and goals of diabetes should follow the same practice guidelines in non-HIV-infected patients. Drug interactions and switching ART are additional management measures in diabetic HIV-infected patients. Since the treatment of lipodystrophy is a challenge, its prevention by selecting appropriate ART is the key.

Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction: an update.

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical features, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of abacavir hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE (1950-October 2007) and EMBASE (1980-October 2007) search using key words abacavir, HIV, human immunodeficiency virus, hypersensitivity reaction, HLA-B(*)5701, and patch tests was conducted. Conference abstracts and article bibliographies were reviewed to identify relevant studies. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies that investigated the clinical and immunogenetic risk factors for abacavir hypersensitivity and the benefit of genetic screening, as well as articles that focused on the clinical presentation, assessment, and management of abacavir HSR, were considered for this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Abacavir hypersensitivity is an immune-mediated reaction that typically occurs within the first 6 weeks of therapy. Signs and symptoms of abacavir HSR are nonspecific, which makes the diagnosis challenging, particularly in medically complex patients. Patch testing may improve the diagnosis and confirmation of abacavir HSR, but it remains experimental. Clinical management is aimed at supportive therapy and discontinuation of abacavir. Rechallenge with abacavir is contraindicated due to the risk of precipitating a life-threatening reaction. Appropriate patient education and a clear communication plan are essential for the safe use of this medication. Identification of patients at risk of developing abacavir hypersensitivity through routine genetic screening for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) HLA-B(*)5701 represents a significant advance in the field of pharmacogenomics, with an apparent 100% negative predictive value when used to screen for abacavir HSR. Preliminary data suggest that pharmacogenetic testing for HLA-B(*)5701 is cost effective. However, until routine testing is available, pharmacovigilance is necessary for the safe and effective use of abacavir. CONCLUSIONS: Serious adverse events associated with the use of abacavir can be avoided by appropriate recognition and management of the HSR. Screening patients for HLA-B(*)5701 prior to initiation of abacavir represents a tool to further decrease the risk of HSRs as well as unnecessary discontinuation of this drug.

Evaluation of HIV drug interaction web sites.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians frequently consult HIV drug interaction Web sites of unknown quality. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and identify HIV drug interaction Web sites of high quality and usefulness for healthcare professionals. METHODS: Relevant Web sites were identified through a structured search on commonly used search engines. An assessment tool containing 4 domains (content, reliability, access restrictions, ease of navigation) was developed. English and French Web sites were selected for review if they included HIV drug interaction information directed to healthcare professionals. Web sites were excluded if antiretroviral interaction data were not available or were out of date. Commercial online databases and sites that required payment were not included. Seventeen HIV pharmacists from across Canada participated in the review. The Web sites were ranked with total mean scores. Mean scores for each domain were then analyzed. Interrater agreement and ANOVA using the rater as a covariate were determined. RESULTS: Nine Web sites met the criteria for review. Web sites from Toronto General Hospital (Canada), HIVinSite (beta version) (US), and the University of Liverpool (UK) ranked highest for total mean scores and for content. Other Web sites were found to be reliable, accessible, and easy to navigate; however, they did not consistently include unpublished data or data on herbal preparations, recreational drugs, or multiple interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Three HIV interaction Web sites of high quality were identified that can be valuable tools for HIV and non-HIV health-care professionals. Regular reviews are necessary in order to keep pace with the growing body of HIV interaction data and the constant evolution of Web sites.

Extrapyramidal symptoms with ritonavir/indinavir plus risperidone.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of suspected extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in a patient initiated on ritonavir and indinavir while taking risperidone for a tic disorder. CASE SUMMARY: A 35-year-old white man with AIDS received risperidone 2 mg twice daily for treatment of a Tourette's-like tic disorder. Ritonavir and indinavir were initiated, and 1 week later, he experienced significantly impaired swallowing, speaking, and breathing, and worsening of his existing tremors. Ritonavir and indinavir were discontinued. On the same day, the patient increased the risperidone dosage to 3 mg twice daily. Symptoms continued to worsen over the next 3 days. All investigations and laboratory parameters were unremarkable, and vital signs were stable. Risperidone was discontinued and clonazepam initiated. Three days later, the patient's symptoms were significantly improved. DISCUSSION: The symptoms described herein are consistent with neuroleptic-induced acute dystonia and potentially neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism. We believe this adverse effect occurred as a result of a drug interaction between ritonavir/indinavir and risperidone. Based on the pharmacokinetics of these medications, we hypothesize that inhibition of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 by ritonavir and indinavir may have resulted in an accumulation of the active moiety of risperidone, which may explain the occurrence of EPS in this patient. CONCLUSIONS: This is the second published case report describing a suspected drug interaction with ritonavir, indinavir, and risperidone. Caution is warranted when risperidone is prescribed with ritonavir/indinavir, and possibly with other antiretrovirals that inhibit the same pathways.