Relative potency of macrocyclic lactones in in vitro assays with larvae of susceptible and drug-resistant Australian isolates of Haemonchus contortus and H. placei.

The present study used in vitro assays to determine the relative potency of commercial macrocyclic lactone (ML) anthelmintics against larvae of drug-susceptible and drug-resistant Australian isolates of important parasites of sheep and cattle, Haemonchus contortus and Haemonchus placei, respectively. Cattle pour-on products containing abamectin, ivermectin, eprinomectin, doramectin or moxidectin were diluted in DMSO and used in larval development assays. Abamectin was the most potent chemical (lowest IC50 value) towards the drug-susceptible H. contortus Kirby isolate. The abamectin IC50 was approximately 2-fold lower than those for ivermectin, moxidectin, eprinomectin and doramectin. Moxidectin and abamectin were the most potent chemicals towards the resistant H. contortus Wallangra isolate. This isolate showed resistance ratios up to 70-fold towards eprinomectin. The resistance ratio for this species was lowest with moxidectin (ratio of 4.0-fold). Abamectin was also the most potent chemical towards both drug-susceptible (Bremner) and drug-resistant (Dayboro) H. placei isolates. The larval development assay only showed low levels of resistance for the drug-resistant H. placei, with resistance ratios ranging from 1.7 to 2.0 fold for moxidectin and abamectin, up to 3.3-fold for eprinomectin. This study examined the readily-accessible larval life stages of these parasites in in vitro assays, and, hence, the relationship between our findings and relative drug efficacies in vivo remains to be determined. Despite this, the study accords with some evidence from the use of these anthelmintics in the field in demonstrating the potency of moxidectin and abamectin against ML-resistant H. contortus. The study also highlights the usefulness of eprinomectin as a readily-available compound which is a more sensitive marker for ML resistance in in vitro larval development assays than the other commercial ML compounds examined.

Measurement of phenotypic resilience to gastro-intestinal nematodes in Merino sheep and association with resistance and production variables.

A cross-over experiment was conducted to compare six different phenotypic measures of resilience to gastro-intestinal nematodes (predominantly Haemonchus contortus) in Merino sheep and their association with resistance and production levels. On each of six farms, 120 ewes born in 2006 and 120 older mixed age ewes were selected at shearing in 2007. Of these, 60 in each mob were serially treated with long-acting anthelmintics to suppress worm populations. The other 60 ewes were managed according to management practices employed on the farm (infected, INF). At shearing in 2008, the experimental sheep had their anthelmintic treatments switched. The experiment concluded at shearing in 2009. Measures of resilience were greasy fleece weight (GFW), live weight gain (LWG) and haematocrit (HCT) when infected and the difference in these variables between infected and suppressed. Resistance was determined from multiple faecal worm egg counts (WEC) when infected. Measures of resilience based on GFW, LWG and HCT were moderately correlated with each other (r=0.25-0.50) suggesting that they represent different traits. Correlations between a measure in infected animals, and the difference in the same measurement between infected and uninfected animals were higher (r=-0.37 to -0.82), indicating that measurement during infection is an adequate measure of resilience. WEC was negatively correlated with LWG and HCT during infection but not GFW. Correlations with resilience measures based on difference between infected and uninfected were positive. Surviving infected sheep were found to have higher haematocrit (HCT), and lower WEC in summer and autumn than sheep that died following the measurement. These results show that measurement of performance traits while infected is a reasonable approximation of measurement of resilience based on the difference in performance between infected and non-infected. They also show that resilience to worm infection is not a single trait, but rather a suite of moderately correlated traits.