An electronic operation note proforma improves the quality of operation notes in burns surgery.

BACKGROUND: An Operation Note should provide a comprehensive account of the details of a surgical procedure performed and document clinically relevant events which occur throughout the procedure. The Royal College of Surgeons of England, in 2014, updated guidelines on specific criteria to be included in operation notes. Standardisation using procedure-specific operation notes has been shown to significantly improve adherence to these guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of operation notes in the Irish National Burns Unit before and after the design and implementation of an electronic patient record and the subsequent introduction of an operation template and a burns surgery specific checklist, within the electronic system. METHODS: A 30-point checklist was designed based on existing sources. Operation notes prior to and following the adoption of a electronic-based operation note were analysed, and then reanalysed following the introduction of a procedure-specific operation note. RESULTS: Ninety-three operation notes were included for analysis. An electronic operation record significantly improved the quality of documentation within our unit. The subsequent procedure specific operation note had a significant improvement across all areas and achieved 100% compliance in many categories. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an electronic patient record to document a patient's procedure has been shown to significantly improve the quality of documentation. One could expect this to result in an improved patient hand-over and subsequent episode of care. We highlight a number of initial pit-falls that others may avoid in their implementation of a digital record.

Breast lipofilling as a treatment for breast hypoplasia in Becker naevus syndrome: a case report.

A Becker's naevus is a rare, pigmented, cutaneous hamartoma, which when associated with other cutaneous or musculoskeletal anomalies is termed Becker naevus syndrome. Female patients commonly seek medical attention for breast hypoplasia. Here, we describe our experience in the surgical management of unilateral breast hypoplasia in a patient with Becker naevus syndrome, using high-volume autologous fat grafting. This is, to our knowledge, the second report in the literature describing the aforementioned management technique in this patient cohort.

Ten-year outcomes following a cohort of ASR XL total hip arthroplasties.

AIMS: To determine the outcome at 10 years of a cohort of ASR XL total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and reasons for revision. METHODS: Between November 2005 and May 2007, 122 ASR XL THAs were implanted. All patients had a routine review at 6 weeks and 1 year, followed by a review in 2009 because of clinical concern and thereafter annual review up to 10 years with MRI. Review also included functional scores, radiographs, pain scores and blood metal ions. RESULTS: 67 (54.9%) ASR XLs had been revised by 11.1 years. Reasons for revision included pain (89.6%), high levels of cobalt and chromium ions (50.7%) and radiographic or MRI changes (80.6%). All 3 factors were present in 23 (34.3%). Pain at 1 year did not predict revision, but pain at the 2009 review did. At 10 years the revised patients had an average Oxford Hip Score (OHS) of 25.38 (12-42) and the non-revised 23.61 (2-21), the difference was not significant (p = 0.48). 3 patients (4.5%) have had a further revision; 2 for a previously unrevised stem and the other for instability. CONCLUSIONS: Our arthroplasty care practitioner service allowed us to identify increased pain and stop using the ASR XL over 3 years before the implant was recalled. The revised patients had similar functional outcome to those unrevised. Poorly performing implants need to be identified earlier.