Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(8): 956-7, 2016 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27346800

ABSTRACT

Electronic monitoring of hand hygiene compliance using the World Health Organization's My 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene is a new innovation that has not yet been shown to reduce hospital infections. We analyzed existing data from 23 inpatient units over a 33-month period and found a significant correlation between unit-specific improvements in electronic monitoring compliance and reductions in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection rates (r = -0.37, P < .001).


Subject(s)
Behavior Observation Techniques/methods , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Electronics, Medical , Hand Hygiene/methods , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/microbiology , Health Facilities , Health Services Research , Humans , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
4.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(6): 602-7, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24837110

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We previously published a formula to estimate the number of hand hygiene opportunities (HHOs) per patient-day using the World Health Organization's "Five Moments for Hand Hygiene" methodology (HOW2 Benchmark Study). HHOs can be used as a denominator for calculating hand hygiene compliance rates when product utilization data are available. This study validates the previously derived HHO estimate using 24-hour video surveillance of health care worker hand hygiene activity. METHODS: The validation study utilized 24-hour video surveillance recordings of 26 patients' hospital stays to measure the actual number of HHOs per patient-day on a medicine ward in a large teaching hospital. Statistical methods were used to compare these results to those obtained by episodic observation of patient activity in the original derivation study. RESULTS: Total hours of data collection were 81.3 and 1,510.8, resulting in 1,740 and 4,522 HHOs in the derivation and validation studies, respectively. Comparisons of the mean and median HHOs per 24-hour period did not differ significantly. HHOs were 71.6 (95% confidence interval: 64.9-78.3) and 73.9 (95% confidence interval: 69.1-84.1), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study validates the HOW2 Benchmark Study and confirms that expected numbers of HHOs can be estimated from the unit's patient census and patient-to-nurse ratio. These data can be used as denominators in calculations of hand hygiene compliance rates from electronic monitoring using the "Five Moments for Hand Hygiene" methodology.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Hand Hygiene/statistics & numerical data , Hand Hygiene/standards , Age Factors , Aged , Bed Occupancy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Guideline Adherence , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing/organization & administration , Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Patients' Rooms , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Time Factors , Video Recording
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 41(12): 1195-9, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23768437

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care-associated infections are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality in US hospitals. Recent changes have broadened the scope of health care-associated infections surveillance data to use in public reporting and of administrative data for determining Medicare reimbursement adjustments for hospital-acquired conditions. METHODS: Infection surveillance results for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), and ventilator-associated pneumonia were compared with infections identified by hospital administrative data. The sensitivity and specificity of administrative data were calculated, with surveillance data considered the gold standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity of administrative data diagnosis codes for CAUTI, CLABSI, and ventilator-associated pneumonia were 0%, 21%, and 25%, respectively. The incorporation of additional diagnosis codes in definitions increased the sensitivity of administrative data somewhat with little decrease in specificity. Positive predictive values for definitions corresponding to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services-defined hospital-acquired conditions were 0% for CAUTI and 41% for CLABSI. CONCLUSIONS: Although infection surveillance methods and administrative data are widely used as tools to identify health care-associated infections, in our study administrative data failed to identify the same infections that were detected by surveillance. Hospitals, already incentivized by the use of performance measures to improve the quality of patient care, should also recognize the need for ongoing scrutiny of appropriate quality measures.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/diagnosis , Epidemiologic Methods , Equipment and Supplies , Cohort Studies , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , United States
6.
Am J Infect Control ; 39(1): 19-26, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21281883

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Measurement and monitoring of health care workers' hand hygiene compliance (i.e., actions/opportunities) is a key component of strategies to eliminate hospital-acquired infections. Little data exist on the expected number of hand hygiene opportunities (HHOs) in various hospital settings, however. The purpose of this study was to estimate HHOs in 2 types of hospitals--large teaching and small community--and 3 different clinical areas-medical-surgical intensive care units, general medical wards, and emergency departments. METHODS: HHO data were collected through direct observations using the World Health Organization's monitoring methodology. Estimates of HHOs were developed for 12-hour AM/PM shifts and 24-hour time frames. RESULTS: During 436.7 hours of observation, 6,640 HHOs were identified. Estimates of HHOs ranged from 30 to 179 per patient-day on inpatient wards and from 1.84 to 5.03 per bed-hour in emergency departments. Significant differences in HHOs were found between the 2 hospital types and among the 3 clinical areas. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to use the World Health Organization's data collection methodology to estimate HHOs in general medical wards and emergency departments. These data can be used as denominator estimates to calculate hand hygiene compliance rates when product utilization data are available.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hand Disinfection/methods , Health Personnel , Health Services Research/methods , Infection Control/methods , Hospitals , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...