ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This studies objective was to evaluate the utility of descending neurogenic-evoked potentials (DNEPs) in the setting of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TCeMEPs) degradation into warning criteria during pediatric spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: An institutional spinal cord monitoring database was queried to identify all primary and revision pediatric spinal deformity cases, < / = 21 years of age performed from 1/2006 to 12/2021, in which TCeMEPs were the primary motor tract assessment modality which degraded into warning criteria, with subsequent initiation of adjunct DNEPs. RESULTS: Fourteen surgical cases (0.42%; 3351 total cases) in fourteen patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 13.2 years (7.5-21.3). DIAGNOSES: syndromic (n = 7), kyphosis (n = 3), congenital (n = 2), and idiopathic (n = 2). Three-column osteotomies (3CO)were done in eight patients. TCeMEPs degraded into warning criteria during screw placement (n = 7), 3CO performance/closure (n = 4), or deformity correction (n = 3). DNEPs were present in all cases of warning-criteria TCeMEPs and one case had degradation of DNEPs. Intraoperative Stagnara wake-up tests were performed in only 2/14 cases, with one transient new neurologic deficit (NND). In this specific scenario, DNEPs sensitivity was 50%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 92% to detect aNND. CONCLUSION: DNEPs were useful in assessing spinal cord function in the setting of TCeMEP data degradation in complex pediatric deformity surgeries. DNEPs demonstrated a higher specificity and positive predictive value in this clinical setting than TCeMEPs when assessing long-term neurologic function after surgery. Based on this small cohort, DNEPs appear to be a useful adjunct modality to TCeMEPs, in this challenging clinical scenario.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The impact of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) on physical function and pain and mental health in pediatric patients as quantified by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), developed by the National Institute of Health, is largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to report the changes of PROMIS scores for upper extremity (UE), pain interference (PI), mobility (MOB), and peer relationships (PR) after PSF in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS), compare postoperative changes in PROMIS PI and Scoliosis Research Society-30 pain scores, and evaluate associations between curve characteristics and PROMIS scores. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 122 patients (<18 years old) who underwent PSF for IS was identified through electronic medical record search. PROMIS scores were obtained preoperatively and 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 years, 2 years, and 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 14.2 ± 1.6 years, and the mean Cobb angle was 62.9 ± 13.8° at surgery. Eighty patients had preoperative PROMIS data. UE and MOB scores were statistically lower at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively and returned to baseline with a longer follow-up. PI scores were significantly lower at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. PR was unchanged up to 2 years postoperatively and then showed significant improvement. There was a statistically significant negative relationships between lowest instrumented vertebra and PROMIS UE and MOB scores at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively, but not at a longer follow-up. There were no significant differences noted in PI and PR PROMIS scores and lowest instrumented vertebra. PROMIS scores were not statistically associated with the Lenke Classification, number of vertebral levels fused, or percentage coronal correction. DISCUSSION: Changes in PROMIS functional domains (UE and MOB) postoperatively normalize at longer follow-ups. Changes in PI and PR demonstrated improvements over preoperative values at 1 to 2 years postoperatively. Preoperative coronal and sagittal measures, and the percentage correction did not correlate with any PROMIS scores.
