Attitudes of GP trainees towards the training received in urology on the GP training scheme.

INTRODUCTION: The majority of patients with scrotal problems or urinary symptoms will first present to their general practitioner (GP). The importance of the initial examination performed by the GP is often underestimated; however, it frequently determines the course of investigation and ultimately treatment. Unfortunately, medical schools have devoted increasingly less time to teaching urology over the past decade. The impact of this decline in teaching on a GP trainee's assessment of urological complaints remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the self-reported competency of GP trainees in assessing urological presentations. METHODS: A questionnaire was circulated to 101 GP trainees from five separate training programmes. Respondents rated their confidence in evaluating four different urological presentations. They were also invited to give their opinion regarding the teaching of urology on their current scheme and whether they would be in favour of the addition of urology as an optional rotation. RESULTS: Only 18 trainees (19 %) felt urology was adequately covered on their curriculum. A small yet significant number of respondents felt uncomfortable in their assessment of testicular (28 %, 28/101) or prostate (35 %, 35/101) pathology and male (17 %, 17/101) or female (10 %, 10/101) urinary symptoms. Twenty-six trainees (26 %) would choose a rotation in urology if available. Another ten trainees felt that attending urology outpatient clinics would benefit training. CONCLUSION: This study highlights a number of concerns among GP trainees in relation to their training in urology. These issues should be addressed to ensure that the training scheme sufficiently prepares GPs to manage common urological conditions.

Neoadjuvant therapy does not affect lymph node ratio in rectal cancer.

AIMS: Recently, lymph-node ratio (LNR) has emerged as a prognostic tool in staging rectal cancer. Studies to date have demonstrated threshold values above and below which survival is differentially altered. Neoadjuvant therapy significantly reduces the number of lymph node retrieved. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of neoadjuvant therapy on LNR and its prognostic properties. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent curative rectal cancer resections in a single institution from 2007 to 2010 were reviewed. LNR was stratified into five subgroups of 0, 0.01-0.17, 0.18-0.41, 0.42-0.69 and 0.7-1.0 based on a previous study. The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on lymph node retrieval, LNR, locoregional (LR) and systemic recurrence (SR), disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who did (Neoadjuvant) and did not (Surgery Alone) receive neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant and Surgery Alone groups were comparable in gender, age and tumour stage. The number of lymph nodes retrieved were significantly lower in the Neoadjuvant group (p < 0.01). However, LNR remained similar in both groups (p = 0.36). There was no statistical difference in the DFS and OS between the Neoadjuvant and Surgery Alone groups at the various LNR cut off values in patients with AJCC Stage 3 tumours. CONCLUSIONS: LNR ratio remains unaltered despite reduced lymph node retrieval after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. LNR may therefore be a more reliable prognostic indicator in this subgroup of patients.

A prospective audit of emergency urology activity in a university teaching hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Urology cover is commonly available out-of-hours in most teaching hospitals. However, increased pressure to reduce hospital expenditure has forced many institutions to consider removing middle grade cover outside of normal working hours. The aim of this study was to audit the emergency urology activity in our institution over a 12-month period. METHODS: A prospective logbook was maintained for all urology referrals from the emergency department between August 2012 and March 2013. The diagnosis and patient outcome was recorded for each referral. The emergency theatre logbook was retrospectively evaluated for all emergency urology procedures carried out over the same time period. A basic cost analysis was performed to calculate the cost of providing the on-call service. RESULTS: A total of 752 patients were referred to the urology service over a 12-month period. The most common reasons for referral were renal colic and scrotal pain. Approximately 41 % of referrals were discharged directly from the emergency department. There were 167 emergency operations performed in total. The majority of emergency operations and referrals from the emergency department took place outside of normal working hours. A basic cost analysis revealed an associated cost saving of €58,120. CONCLUSION: Emergency urology activity constitutes a large proportion of the workload at our institution. Restricting emergency urology cover would limit essential training opportunities for urology trainees, increases length of stay and delay treatment of urological emergencies. Urology "out of hours" cover is a cost-efficient method of service provision.

Death in neonatal intensive care.

The aim of this study was to review the frequency of decisions to withdraw treatment from neonates who had died in a large neonatal intensive care unit, the reasons for these decisions, and the procedures followed. A 12 month retrospective review of medical and nursing records was undertaken. There were 67 deaths; treatment was withdrawn from 52 infants who were dead or dying, from 9 infants on the basis of a severe congenital abnormality, and from 6 infants with severe acquired brain damage. The decision-making process and the management of treatment withdrawal are reviewed. It is concluded that withdrawal of treatment resulting in death occurs frequently in the neonatal intensive care service of National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand, but is usually a recognition of the inevitable. Truly elective withdrawal of treatment is uncommon in the immature infant, but does occur in the context of multiple abnormalities or severe birth asphyxia, where it follows a formal procedure.