Video-based valve motion combined with computational fluid dynamics gives stable and accurate simulations of blood flow in the Realheart total artificial heart.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage, biventricular heart failure, and for whom heart transplantation is not an option, may be given a Total Artificial Heart (TAH). The Realheart® is a novel TAH which pumps blood by mimicking the native heart with translation of an atrioventricular plane. The aim of this work was to create a strategy for using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to simulate haemodynamics in the Realheart®, including motion of the atrioventricular plane and valves. METHODS: The accuracies of four different computational methods for simulating fluid-structure interaction of the prosthetic valves were assessed by comparison of chamber pressures and flow rates with experimental measurements. The four strategies were: prescribed motion of valves opening and closing at the atrioventricular plane extrema; simulation of fluid-structure interaction of both valves; prescribed motion of the mitral valve with simulation of fluid-structure interaction of the aortic valve; motion of both valves prescribed from video analysis of experiments. RESULTS: The most accurate strategy (error in ventricular pressure of 6%, error in flow rate of 5%) used video-prescribed motion. With the Realheart operating at 80 bpm, the power consumption was 1.03 W, maximum shear stress was 15 Pa, and washout of the ventricle chamber after 4 cycles was 87%. CONCLUSIONS: This study, the first CFD analysis of this novel TAH, demonstrates that good agreement between computational and experimental data can be achieved. This method will therefore enable future optimisation of the geometry and motion of the Realheart®.

Comparison of the within-reader and inter-vendor agreement of left ventricular circumferential strains and volume indices derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: Volume indices and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are routinely used to assess cardiac function. Ventricular strain values may provide additional diagnostic information, but their reproducibility is unclear. This study therefore compares the repeatability and reproducibility of volumes, volume fraction, and regional ventricular strains, derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, across three software packages and between readers. METHODS: Seven readers analysed 16 short-axis CMR stacks of a porcine heart. Endocardial contours were manually drawn using OsiriX and Simpleware ScanIP and repeated in both softwares. The images were also contoured automatically in Circle CVI42. Endocardial global, apical, mid-ventricular, and basal circumferential strains, as well as end-diastolic and end-systolic volume and LVEF were compared. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis found systematic biases in contour length between software packages. Compared to OsiriX, contour lengths were shorter in both ScanIP (-1.9 cm) and CVI42 (-0.6 cm), causing statistically significant differences in end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, and apical circumferential strain (all p<0.006). No differences were found for mid-ventricular, basal or global strains, or left ventricular ejection fraction (all p<0.007). All CVI42 results lay within the ranges of the OsiriX results. Intra-software differences were found to be lower than inter-software differences. CONCLUSION: OsiriX and CVI42 gave consistent results for all strain and volume metrics, with no statistical differences found between OsiriX and ScanIP for mid-ventricular, global or basal strains, or left ventricular ejection fraction. However, volumes were influenced by the choice of contouring software, suggesting care should be taken when comparing volumes across different software.