A Flipped Classroom Pilot in Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation.

Background: Pediatric residents frequently manage critically ill neonates but have limited systematic training in mechanical ventilation (MV). Competing demands, varying learner levels, and topic complexity contribute to inconsistent education. A blended learning approach may be ideally suited to achieve meaningful learning but has not been described for this topic and learner. Objective: To design, implement, and evaluate a flipped classroom for pediatric residents in neonatal MV. Methods: We used Kern's six-step framework for curricular development to create a flipped classroom curriculum in neonatal MV. Individual prework included interaction with six prerecorded animated whiteboard videos, while in-person learning occurred in small groups at the bedside of a ventilated infant. A mixed-methods evaluation included surveys, quantitative knowledge test scores (before, immediately after, and six months after course completion), and qualitative analysis of participant focus groups. Results: Twenty-six learners participated in the curriculum. Mean knowledge test scores rose and were sustained after course completion (51% baseline, 82% immediate posttest, 90% retention; P < 0.001). Learners identified various design elements, technology affordances, and instructor factors as meaningful, and they identified unexpected impacts of the curriculum beyond knowledge acquisition, including effects on professional identities, interdisciplinary communication skills, and contribution to the culture of safety. Conclusion: This curriculum aligned with resident roles, was meaningful to learners, and led to long-term increases in knowledge scores and access to quality education; flipped classroom design using meaningful learning theory and leveraging animated whiteboard technology may be a useful strategy for other highly complex topics in graduate medical education.

Understanding Team Dynamics and Culture of Safety Using Video Reflexive Ethnography during Real-Time Emergent Intubation.

Rationale: Endotracheal intubation is the third most common bedside procedure in U.S. hospitals. In over 40% of intubations, preventable complications attributable to human factors occur. A better understanding of team dynamics during intubation may improve patient safety. Objectives: To explore team dynamics and safety-related actions during emergent endotracheal intubations in the emergency department and intensive care unit and to engage members of the care team in reflection for process improvement through a novel video-based team debriefing technique. Methods: Video-reflexive ethnography involves in situ video recording and reflexive discussions with practitioners to scrutinize behaviors and to identify opportunities for improvement. In this study, real-time intubations were recorded in the emergency department and intensive care unit at Mayo Clinic Rochester, and facilitated video-reflexive sessions were conducted with the multidisciplinary procedural teams. Themes about team dynamics and safety-related action were identified inductively from transcriptions of recorded sessions. Results: Between December 2022 and January 2023, eight video-reflexive sessions were conducted with a total of 78 participants. Multidisciplinary members included nurses (n = 23), respiratory therapists (n = 16), pharmacists (n = 7), advanced practitioners (n = 5), and physicians (n = 26). In video-reflexive discussions, major safety gaps were identified and several solutions were proposed related to the use of a multidisciplinary intubation checklist, standardized communication and team positioning, developing a culture of safety, and routinely debriefing after the procedure. Conclusions: The findings of this study may inform the development of a team supervision model for emergent endotracheal intubations. This approach could integrate key components such as a multidisciplinary intubation checklist, standardized communication and team positioning, a culture of safety, and debriefing as part of the procedure itself.

Leveraging multisource feedback to address diversity, equity, and inclusivity.

Multisource feedback has long been a recommended tool to assess clinical competencies within graduate medical education. Additionally, incorporating feedback supplied by patients and other members of the healthcare team can provide the framework to bridge perspectives and viewpoints that may be different from their own. This, in effect, can aid in fortifying values in diversity, equity, and inclusivity by developing more knowledgeable, empathetic, and respectful future healthcare providers.

Gender Disparities in Critical Care Procedure Training of Internal Medicine Residents.

Background: Procedural training is a required competency in internal medicine (IM) residency, yet limited data exist on residents' experience of procedural training. Objectives: We sought to understand how gender impacts access to procedural training among IM residents. Methods: A mixed-methods, explanatory sequential study was performed. Procedure volume for IM residents between 2016 and 2020 was assessed at two large academic residencies (Program A and Program B: 399 residents and 4,020 procedures). Procedural rates and actual versus expected procedure volume by gender were compared, with separate analyses by clinical environment (intensive care unit [ICU] or structured procedural service). Semistructured gender-congruent focus groups were conducted. Topics included identity formation as a proceduralist and the resident procedural learning experience, including perceived gender bias in procedure allocation. Results: Compared with men, women residents performed disproportionately fewer ICU procedures per month at Program A (1.4 vs. 2.7; P < 0.05) but not at Program B (0.36 vs. 0.54; P = 0.23). At Program A, women performed only 47% of ICU procedures, significantly fewer than the 54% they were expected to perform on the basis of their time on ICU rotations (P < 0.001). For equal gender distribution of procedural volume at Program A, 11% of the procedures performed by men would have needed to have been performed by women instead. Gender was not associated with differences in the Program A structured procedural service (53% observed vs. 52% expected; P = 0.935), Program B structured procedural service (40% observed vs. 43% expected; P = 0.174), or in Program B ICUs (33% observed vs. 34% expected; P = 0.656). Focus group analysis identified that women from both residencies perceived that assertiveness was required for procedural training in unstructured learning environments. Residents felt that gender influenced access to procedural opportunities, ability to self-advocate for procedural experience, identity formation as a proceduralist, and confidence in acquiring procedural skills. Conclusion: Gender disparities in access to procedural training during ICU rotations were seen at one institution but not another. There were ubiquitous perceptions that assertiveness was important to access procedural opportunities. We hypothesize that structured allocation of procedures would mitigate disparities by allowing all residents to access procedural training regardless of self-advocacy. Residency programs should adopt structured procedural training programs to counteract inequities.

Build It and They Shall Come: Medical Education Communities of Practice.

Background: Producing scholarship in education is essential to the career development of a clinician-educator. Challenges to scholarly production include a lack of resources, time, expertise, and collaborators. Objective: To develop communities of practice for education scholarship through an international society to increase community and academic productivity. Methods: We developed multi-institutional scholarship pods within the American Thoracic Society through the creation of a working group (2017-2019). Pods met virtually, and meetings were goal focused to advance education scholarship within their area of interest. To understand the impact of these scholarship pods, we surveyed pod leaders and members in 2021 and analyzed the academic productivity of each pod via a survey of pod leaders and a review of the PubMed index. Results: Nine pods were created, each with an assigned educational topic. The survey had a response rate of 76.6%. The perceived benefits were the opportunity to meet colleagues with similar interests at other institutions, production of scholarly work, and engagement in new experiences. The main challenges were difficulty finding times to meet because of competing clinical demands and aligning times among pod members. Regarding academic productivity, eight publications, four conference presentations, and one webinar/podcast were produced by six of the nine pods. Conclusion: The development of communities of practice resulted in increased multi-site collaboration, with boosted academic productivity as well as an enhanced sense of belonging. Multiple challenges remain but can likely be overcome with accountability, early discussion of roles and expectations, and clear delegation of tasks and authorship.

The Resident Learning Journey in the Medical Intensive Care Unit.

Background: The medical intensive care unit (MICU) offers rich resident learning opportunities, but traditional teaching strategies can be difficult to employ in this fast-paced, high-acuity environment. Resident perspectives of learning within this environment may improve our understanding of the common challenges residents face and inform novel approaches to transform the MICU educational experience. Objective: We conducted a qualitative study of internal medicine residents to better understand their approach to learning the critical care activities that they are entrusted to perform in the MICU. Methods: Using a thematic analysis approach, we conducted six focus group interviews with 15 internal medicine residents, separated by postgraduate year. A trained investigator led each interview, which was audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for analysis. Our diverse research team, representing different career stages across the continuum of learning to minimize interpretive bias, identified codes and subsequent themes inductively. We refined these themes through group discussion and sensitizing social learning theory concepts using Wenger's community of practice and organized them to create learner archetypes and a conceptual framework of resident learning in the MICU. Results: We identified three thematic resident learning categories: learning goals and motivation, clinical engagement, and interprofessional collaboration. We distinguished three learner archetypes, the novice, experiential learner, and practicing member, to describe progressive resident development within the interprofessional MICU team, the challenges they frequently encounter, and potential teaching strategies to facilitate learning. Conclusion: We developed a conceptual framework that describes the resident's journey to becoming a trusted, collaborating member of the interprofessional MICU team. We identified common developmental challenges residents face and offer educational strategies that may support their progress. These findings should inform future efforts to develop novel teaching strategies to promote resident learning in the MICU.

Development and usability testing of a patient digital twin for critical care education: a mixed methods study.

Background: Digital twins are computerized patient replicas that allow clinical interventions testing in silico to minimize preventable patient harm. Our group has developed a novel application software utilizing a digital twin patient model based on electronic health record (EHR) variables to simulate clinical trajectories during the initial 6 h of critical illness. This study aimed to assess the usability, workload, and acceptance of the digital twin application as an educational tool in critical care. Methods: A mixed methods study was conducted during seven user testing sessions of the digital twin application with thirty-five first-year internal medicine residents. Qualitative data were collected using a think-aloud and semi-structured interview format, while quantitative measurements included the System Usability Scale (SUS), NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), and a short survey. Results: Median SUS scores and NASA-TLX were 70 (IQR 62.5-82.5) and 29.2 (IQR 22.5-34.2), consistent with good software usability and low to moderate workload, respectively. Residents expressed interest in using the digital twin application for ICU rotations and identified five themes for software improvement: clinical fidelity, interface organization, learning experience, serious gaming, and implementation strategies. Conclusion: A digital twin application based on EHR clinical variables showed good usability and high acceptance for critical care education.

Assessment of Gender Parity: Leadership Representation in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.

Background: Academic centers' and professional societies' top leadership representation and professional societies' award recipients remain disparate by gender in many fields. Little is known regarding leadership representation and recognition within pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine (PCCM), which has ∼22% women physicians. We sought to understand the landscape of female PCCM leaders. Methods: We abstracted gender of fellowship program directors (PDs), Department of Medicine (DOM) Chairs and Division Chiefs from academic medical centers with PCCM fellowship programs from 2018 and for comparison 2008. We abstracted leadership and recognition award recipients within four PCCM professional societies from 2013 to 2018 (American Thoracic Society [ATS], American Academy of Sleep Medicine [AASM], American College of Chest Physicians [CHEST], and Society of Critical Care Medicine [SCCM]). Results: In 2018, 29% of PCCM PD, 15% of PCCM Division Chiefs, and 15% of DOM Chairs were women. There were significantly more female PDs in 2018 (29%) compared with 2008 (16%, p = 0.04). On average, 25% of society presidents were women, with 28% of PCCM societal awards going to women, with significant difference between societies (p = 0.04). Each society differed in average distribution of female board members over the 6-year period: ATS 38%, AASM 35%, CHEST 18%, and SCCM 44% (p < 0.001). Conclusion: PCCM leadership and societal recognition are disparate by gender with few women holding top leadership roles and receiving societal recognition. Fortunately, the distribution notably is starting to reflect the specialty's demographics. Understanding why these inequalities exist will be essential to achieving gender parity in PCCM.

Virtual Procedural Supervision During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Novel Pilot for Supervising Invasive Bedside Procedures in the ICU.

The ability to perform invasive bedside procedures (IBPs) safely and efficiently is a core skill set within critical care medicine. Fellowship training provides a pivotal time for learners to attain baseline proficiency in such procedures to decrease patient complications. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has posed distinct challenges to the traditional model of teaching and supervising IBPs in the intensive care unit, including stewardship of personal protective equipment and limiting health care worker exposure to persons with coronavirus disease 2019. To address these challenges, we piloted a novel method of IBP supervision and teaching using a virtual monitoring system. In this virtual procedural supervision model, the supervising teacher is located outside the patient room, limiting personal protective equipment use and health care worker exposure. An audiovisual monitoring system allowed communication between the teacher and the learner as well as supervisor visualization of the procedural encounter. Virtual supervision was used for central line placement and bronchoscopy in the medical intensive care unit with no complications or instances of the supervisor needing to enter the patient room. Success was felt to depend on camera positioning and preprocedure planning and to be best for advanced learners who would not require tactile feedback. Upper level learners appreciated autonomy granted by this process. Virtual IBP supervision is felt to be a useful tool in specific situations. As with any tool, there are notable strengths and limitations. Success is felt to be optimized when attention is paid to procedural teaching best practices, learner selection, and technological logistics.

Examining Burnout in Interprofessional Intensive Care Unit Clinicians Using Qualitative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Health care professionals working in intensive care units report a high degree of burnout, but this topic has not been extensively studied from an interdisciplinary perspective. OBJECTIVE: To characterize experiences of burnout among members of interprofessional intensive care unit teams and identify possible contributing factors. METHODS: This qualitative study involved interviews of registered nurses, respiratory therapists, physicians, pharmacists, and a personal care assistant working in multiple intensive care units of a single academic medical center to assess work stressors. RESULTS: Team composition was a factor in burnout, particularly when nonphysician team members felt that their opinions were not valued despite the institution's emphasis on a multidisciplinary team-based model of care. This was especially true when roles were not well defined at the outset of a code situation. Members of nearly all disciplines stated that there was not enough time in a day to complete all the required tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors contribute to work-related stress and burnout across different professions in the intensive care unit. Improved communication and increased receptivity to diverse opinions among members of the multidisciplinary team may help reduce stress.

Pulmonary Critical Care Fellows' Use of and Self-reported Barriers to Learning Bedside Ultrasound During Training: Results of a National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Competence in ultrasonography is essential for pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) fellows, but little is known about fellow-reported barriers to acquiring this crucial skill during fellowship training. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do PCCM fellows acquire experience performing and interpreting ultrasonography during their training, what is their perspective on barriers to acquiring ultrasound expertise during fellowship, and what is their comfort with a range of ultrasound examinations? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 20-item survey including questions about procedural training and acquisition of ultrasound skills during PCCM fellowship was developed. The survey instrument was sent to PCCM fellowship program directors to distribute to their fellows at program directors' discretion. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-five responses were received. The most common method of learning ultrasonography was performing it independently at the bedside. Fellows reported that the greatest barrier to acquiring ultrasound skills was the lack of trained faculty experts, followed by lack of a formal curriculum. Fellow comfort was greatest with thoracic ultrasound and least with advanced cardiac ultrasound. INTERPRETATION: Significant barriers to ultrasound training during PCCM fellowship exist, and future educational efforts should address these barriers at both program and institutional levels.

Feasibility and Utility of an Eye-Tracking Device for Assessing Teachers of Invasive Bedside Procedures.

Patient-related complications from invasive bedside procedures (IBPs) are attributed to the experience and proficiency of the operator. Furthermore, IBP complications by trainees may be due to practice variability and competency among IBP teachers. The use of gaze metrics technology to better understand the behaviors of IBP teachers may aid in the creation of faculty development checklists and, ultimately, reduce procedural complications. Prior research on gaze patterns has focused on the individual performing the procedure, but the goal of this pilot study was to assess gaze behaviors of supervising teachers of IBPs, which is a paradigm shift within procedural education. In this study, pulmonary and critical care medicine fellows placed a central venous catheter on a simulated task trainer as pulmonary and critical care medicine faculty supervised while wearing an eye-tracking device. Both quantitative and qualitative data were obtained. Gaze analysis was divided into 2 areas of interest (ultrasonography and procedure site) and 3 procedural tasks (venous puncture, dilation, and flushing the line). Study findings included the following: (1) calibration was easy and took seconds to complete, (2) the device is relatively comfortable and did not interfere with tasks, (3) a trend toward a higher fixation frequency and dwell time on the ultrasound images during the puncture segment, and (4) variations in fixation frequency on the ultrasound images among supervising IBP teachers. This study documents the feasibility of the eye-tracking device for assessing behaviors of supervisory IBP teachers. There may be a signal suggesting differences in gaze patterns among supervisory teachers, which warrants further study.

Characteristics of Effective Teachers of Invasive Bedside Procedures: A Multi-institutional Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Faculty supervision of invasive bedside procedures (IBPs) in the ICU may enhance procedural education and ensure patient safety. However, there is limited research on teaching effectiveness in the ICU, and there are no best teaching practices regarding the supervision of IBPs. RESEARCH QUESTION: We conducted a multi-institutional qualitative study of pulmonary and critical care medicine faculty and fellows to better understand characteristics of effective IBP teachers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Separate focus groups (FGs) were conducted with fellows and faculty at four large academic institutions that were geographically distributed across the United States. FGs were facilitated by a trained investigator, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim for analysis. Themes were identified inductively and compared with constructs from social and situated learning theories. Data were analyzed between and across professional groups. Qualitative research software (NVivo; QSR International) was used to facilitate data organization and create an audit trail of the analysis. A multidisciplinary research team was engaged to minimize interpretive bias. RESULTS: Thirty-three faculty and 30 fellows participated. Inductive analysis revealed three categories of themes among successful IBP teachers: traits, behaviors, and context. Traits included calm demeanor, trust, procedural competence, and effective communication. Behaviors included leading preprocedure huddles to assess learners' experiences and define expectations; debriefing to provide feedback; and allowing appropriate autonomy. Context included learning climate, levels of distraction, patient acuity, and institutional culture. INTERPRETATION: We identified specific traits and behaviors of effective IBP teachers that intersect with the practice environment, which highlights the challenge of teaching IBPs. Notably, FG participants emphasized interpersonal, more than technical, aspects of successful IBP teachers. These findings should inform future curricula on teaching IBPs in the ICU, standardize IBP teaching for pulmonary and critical care medicine fellows, and reduce patient injury from procedural complications.

Twelve tips for conducting successful interprofessional teaching rounds.

Inpatient bedside teaching rounds provide an opportunity to foster effective interprofessional collaboration between members of the healthcare team. Although effective interprofessional practice has been shown to improve patient satisfaction, patient outcomes, and job satisfaction, there is limited literature for successful implementation of interprofessional teaching rounds. To address this gap, we have compiled 12 tips for conducting effective interprofessional bedside teaching rounds. These tips offer strategies for creating a structured rounding system, with clear delineation of expectations, defined opportunities for learning across disciplines, and active engagement of and respect for all team members. By adopting and promoting this model of interprofessional collaborative practice, the quality and effectiveness of bedside teaching rounds can be improved for the benefit of patients, trainees, and the team as a whole.