Transfusion Requirement in Burn Care Evaluation (TRIBE): A Multicenter Randomized Prospective Trial of Blood Transfusion in Major Burn Injury.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare outcomes of a restrictive to a liberal red cell transfusion strategy in 20% or more total body surface area (TBSA) burn patients. We hypothesized that the restrictive group would have less blood stream infection (BSI), organ dysfunction, and mortality. BACKGROUND: Patients with major burns have major (>1 blood volume) transfusion requirements. Studies suggest that a restrictive blood transfusion strategy is equivalent to a liberal strategy. However, major burn injury is precluded from these studies. The optimal transfusion strategy in major burn injury is thus needed but remains unknown. METHODS: This prospective randomized multicenter trial block randomized patients to a restrictive (hemoglobin 7-8 g/dL) or liberal (hemoglobin 10-11 g/dL) transfusion strategy throughout hospitalization. Data collected included demographics, infections, transfusions, and outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen burn centers enrolled 345 patients with 20% or more TBSA burn similar in age, TBSA burn, and inhalation injury. A total of 7054 units blood were transfused. The restrictive group received fewer blood transfusions: mean 20.3 ±â€Š32.7 units, median = 8 (interquartile range: 3, 24) versus mean 31.8 ±â€Š44.3 units, median = 16 (interquartile range: 7, 40) in the liberal group (P < 0.0001, Wilcoxon rank sum). BSI incidence, organ dysfunction, ventilator days, and time to wound healing (P > 0.05) were similar. In addition, there was no 30-day mortality difference: 9.5% restrictive versus 8.5% liberal (P = 0.892, χ test). CONCLUSIONS: A restrictive transfusion strategy halved blood product utilization. Although the restrictive strategy did not decrease BSI, mortality, or organ dysfunction in major burn injury, these outcomes were no worse than the liberal strategy (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01079247).

Positive fungal cultures in burn patients: a multicenter review.

Fungal infections are increasingly common in burn patients. We performed this study to determine the incidence and outcomes of fungal cultures in acutely burned patients. Members of the American Burn Association's Multicenter Trials Group were asked to review patients admitted during 2002-2003 who developed one or more cultures positive for fungal organisms. Data on demographics, site(s), species and number of cultures, and presence of risk factors for fungal infections were collected. Patients were categorized as untreated (including prophylactic topical antifungals therapy), nonsystemic treatment (nonprophylactic topical antifungal therapy, surgery, removal of foreign bodies), or systemic treatment (enteral or parenteral therapy). Fifteen institutions reviewed 6918 patients, of whom 435 (6.3%) had positive fungal cultures. These patients had mean age of 33.2 +/- 23.6 years, burn size of 34.8 +/- 22.7%TBSA, and 38% had inhalation injuries. Organisms included Candida species (371 patients; 85%), yeast non-Candida (93 patients, 21%), Aspergillus (60 patients, 14%), other mold (39 patients, 9.0%), and others (6 patients, 1.4%). Systemically treated patients were older, had larger burns, more inhalation injuries, more risk factors, a higher incidence of multiple positive cultures, and significantly increased mortality (21.2%), compared with nonsystemic (mortality 5.0%) or untreated patients (mortality 7.8%). In multivariate analysis, increasing age and burn size, number of culture sites, and cultures positive for Aspergillus or other mold correlated with mortality. Positive fungal cultures occur frequently in patients with large burns. The low mortality for untreated patients suggests that appropriate clinical judgment was used in most treatment decisions. Nonetheless, indications for treatment of fungal isolates in burn patients remain unclear, and should be developed.

Effect of blood transfusion on outcome after major burn injury: a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: To delineate blood transfusion practices and outcomes in patients with major burn injury. CONTEXT: Patients with major burn injury frequently require multiple blood transfusions; however, the effect of blood transfusion after major burn injury has had limited study. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Regional burn centers throughout the United States and Canada. PATIENT POPULATION: Patients admitted to a participating burn center from January 1 through December 31, 2002, with acute burn injuries of >or=20% total body surface area. OUTCOMES MEASURED: Outcome measurements included mortality, number of infections, length of stay, units of blood transfused in and out of the operating room, number of operations, and anticoagulant use. RESULTS: A total of 21 burn centers contributed data on 666 patients; 79% of patients survived and received a mean of 14 units of packed red blood cells during their hospitalization. Mortality was related to patient age, total body surface area burn, inhalation injury, number of units of blood transfused outside the operating room, and total number of transfusions. The number of infections per patient increased with each unit of blood transfused (odds ratio, 1.13; p<.001). Patients on anticoagulation during hospitalization received more blood than patients not on anticoagulation (16.3+/-1.5 vs. 12.3+/-1.5, p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of transfusions received was associated with mortality and infectious episodes in patients with major burns even after factoring for indices of burn severity. The utilization of blood products in the treatment of major burn injury should be reserved for patients with a demonstrated physiologic need.

Effects of oxandrolone on outcome measures in the severely burned: a multicenter prospective randomized double-blind trial.

Severe burns induce pathophysiologic problems, among them catabolism of lean mass, leading to protracted hospitalization and prolonged recovery. Oxandrolone is an anabolic agent shown to decrease lean mass catabolism and improve wound healing in the severely burned patients. We enrolled 81 adult subjects with burns 20% to 60% TBSA in a multicenter trial testing the effects of oxandrolone on length of hospital stay. Subjects were randomized between oxandrolone 10 mg every 12 hours or placebo. The study was stopped halfway through projected enrollment because of a significant difference between groups found on planned interim analysis. We found that length of stay was shorter in the oxandrolone group (31.6 +/- 3.1 days) than placebo (43.3 +/- 5.3 days; P < .05). This difference strengthened when deaths were excluded and hospital stay was indexed to burn size (1.24 +/- 0.15 days/% TBSA burned vs 0.87 +/- 0.05 days/% TBSA burned, P < .05). We conclude that treatment using oxandrolone should be considered for use in the severely burned while hepatic transaminases are monitored.

Tracheostomy in thermally injured patients: does diagnosis-related group 483 adequately estimate resource use and hospital costs?

BACKGROUND: This study compares burn and nonburn patients undergoing tracheostomy, all of whom were assigned to diagnosis-related group 483 to determine hospital reimbursement. METHODS: We reviewed the records of all inpatients admitted to our hospital from January 2000 through December 2001 who underwent tracheostomy and who were assigned to diagnosis-related group 483. In addition, we compared our burn patient data with that from three other burn centers and the National Burn Repository. RESULTS: We identified 357 inpatients who had tracheostomies during their hospitalization, only 12 of whom (3.4%) had acute burn injuries. The mean extent of burn in these patients was 43.4% total body surface area. The most frequent primary diagnoses for nonburn patients were injury and poisoning, and circulatory and respiratory disorders. Patients with burn injuries had 39.6 ventilator days, 40.7 intensive care unit days, and 49.2 hospital days compared with 19.8, 17.4, and 29.5 days, respectively, for nonburn patients (p <0.0001). Demographic, resource, and financial data for burn patients treated at the three other burn centers and those reported to the National Burn Repository were not significantly different from burn patients treated at our hospital. Total costs and charges for the care of burn patients were $186,830 and $343,904, respectively, compared with $82,176 and $160,498 for the nonburn patients (p <0.0005). CONCLUSION: Burn patients requiring tracheostomies during their acute hospitalization consume significantly more resources than patients without burn injuries. More appropriate resource-based reimbursement for the care of these patients appears warranted.

Treatment of the exposed Achilles tendon using negative pressure wound therapy: a case report.

Exposed tendons after burn injury create a surgical challenge for the treating physician. This is particularly true with regard to the exposed Achilles tendon. This case report reviews the nature of this challenge and traditional solutions, and describes the use of negative pressure wound therapy to facilitate coverage of the Achilles tendon. This therapy may provide a more appropriate therapeutic option for dealing with tendon exposure after severe burns.