Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Epidemiol Infect ; 117(3): 457-62, 1996 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8972669

ABSTRACT

After a nursery school trip to a dairy farm, 20 (53%) of 38 children and 3 (23%) of 13 adult helpers developed gastrointestinal infection. Campylobacter jejuni was isolated from 15 primary cases and from 3 of 9 secondary household cases. A cohort study of the school party found illness to be associated with drinking raw milk (relative risk 5.4, 95% confidence interval 1.4-20.4, P = 0.001). There was a significant dose response relationship between amount of raw milk consumed and risk of illness (chi 2-test for linear trend 12.1, P = 0.0005) but not with incubation period, severity of symptoms or duration of illness. All 18 human campylobacter isolates were C. jejuni resistotype 02 and either biotype I (number 16) or biotype II (number 2). Campylobacter was also isolated from samples of dairy cattle and bird faeces obtained at the farm but these were of different resisto/biotypes. Educational farm visits have become increasingly popular in recent years and this outbreak illustrates the hazard of exposure to raw milk in this setting.


Subject(s)
Campylobacter Infections/epidemiology , Campylobacter jejuni/isolation & purification , Cattle/microbiology , Disease Outbreaks , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Milk/microbiology , Adult , Animals , Campylobacter Infections/physiopathology , Campylobacter jejuni/pathogenicity , Child, Preschool , Epidemiologic Methods , Gastroenteritis/physiopathology , Humans , Wales/epidemiology
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 116(2): 169-75, 1996 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8620908

ABSTRACT

A 9-month trial of a simple typing scheme for ¿thermophilic' enteric campylobacter isolates at a large Public Health Laboratory is described. Resistotyping was performed with six agents in a method modified by Bolton and colleagues from an earlier scheme, and biotyping was performed by a modified Lior scheme involving three tests. Reproducibility was excellent in both schemes, with test variation < 2%. Five household clusters and one larger presumptive milk-borne outbreak were identified in this scheme, and confirmed in pyrolysis mass spectrometry. The 328 isolates from new patients, excluding duplication from these clusters, were divided into 35 resistotypes with the largest group comprising 22% of isolates. In combined bio- and resistotyping, 86 types were found, with the largest group comprising 9.5% of isolates. The results are contrasted with salmonella sero- and phage-typing, where, on the same basis, the 176 isolates in the same period were divided into 40 groups, with the largest comprising 45% of isolates. Resistotyping, with or without additional biotyping, proved to be a convenient, simple, rapid, highly discriminatory, reproducible and inexpensive method well suited to use in local laboratories. It is a strong candidate for first-line national and local surveillance of campylobacter infections, fulfilling a need for monitoring of this important cause of enteric disease.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Typing Techniques , Campylobacter Infections/microbiology , Campylobacter/classification , Adult , Campylobacter/isolation & purification , Campylobacter Infections/epidemiology , Child , Cluster Analysis , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...